Euro specialized indy-mechanics all seem to use LiquiMoly?

Did somebody say Liquimoly?
ike_where_this_thread_is_going-vi.webp
 
My cars are still under warranty so I usually take them to a Porsche or Euro specialized Indy who reports service to Carfax and documents the change. One thing I noticed is that whenever I ask them what oil they use, it’s always LiquiMoly.

Kind of curious but does LiquiMoly just dominate the market with much cheaper pricing for independent mechanics or something?

(Yes, I know I can document my DIY oil change but it’s a pain when reselling the car or when proving service for warranty purposes).
My MB/BMW indy shop switched to LM because it was quite a bit cheaper than Mobil 1 that he used for years. It's cheaper and has 229.5 on it.
 
I would argue it also has an exclusivity component as well. Anyone can get an off the shelf oil but not everyone knows to order from an online euro shop like ECS or FCP euro. Same thing can be said for Amsoil indys, makes you feel like the shop has something "special".
 
Be advised that LiquiMoly uses a type 3 base stock. Sooo, on its US website it can claim that it's a synthetic oil. However, it can't make that claim on its German website. Why? While the US courts ruled that like Mobil 1, LiquiMoly is "synthetic." The German courts have ruled that the base stock must be either type 4 or 5 for an oil to be advertised as being "synthetic."
 
Be advised that LiquiMoly uses a type 3 base stock. Sooo, on its US website it can claim that it's a synthetic oil. However, it can't make that claim on its German website. Why? While the US courts ruled that like Mobil 1, LiquiMoly is "synthetic." The German courts have ruled that the base stock must be either type 4 or 5 for an oil to be advertised as being "synthetic."
 
Be advised that LiquiMoly uses a type 3 base stock. Sooo, on its US website it can claim that it's a synthetic oil. However, it can't make that claim on its German website. Why? While the US courts ruled that like Mobil 1, LiquiMoly is "synthetic." The German courts have ruled that the base stock must be either type 4 or 5 for an oil to be advertised as being "synthetic."
Most, yes. Their Synthoil line is "vollsynthetisch," i.e. not hydrocracked, but has no manufacturer approvals and doesn't appear to be any better than their HC products based on their data sheets.
 
Oddly the two Indy's I use here are Motul disciples. LM is inexpensive, and I hear their distis are easy to deal with and offer a 'one stop shop'. I never used LM as back in the day I remember them selling friction modifier, and other snake oil type additives which was enough to turn me offf....I could be wrong but there are probably better choices for your money.
 
Oddly the two Indy's I use here are Motul disciples. LM is inexpensive, and I hear their distis are easy to deal with and offer a 'one stop shop'. I never used LM as back in the day I remember them selling friction modifier, and other snake oil type additives which was enough to turn me offf....I could be wrong but there are probably better choices for your money.
I wonder if Motul 8100 excess 2nd gen is full synthetic- their advertising suggests it is
 
But please remember: On BITOG, one have to allways blame LM for wrong advertising and allways praise Motul for being "Fully Synthetic with Ester". ;)
Motul, unlike LM, does offer ester based products.
LM also offers unique oils, I mean if you look at amount of heavy paraffinic base oils.
 
Back
Top Bottom