You clearly already have that with the SUPER Beetle!Those are the only two cars I like from them. That really sucks. I have to say I’d love to have a Challenger but it’s just too loaded for me haha. I need a simple sports car with a real key.
You clearly already have that with the SUPER Beetle!Those are the only two cars I like from them. That really sucks. I have to say I’d love to have a Challenger but it’s just too loaded for me haha. I need a simple sports car with a real key.
Yes there is a cool sound. Here's a 0-60 I filmed of it.
Not too surprising for a line of cars focused on straight-line speed.
They tried a Challenger Demon with race gas, one seat, largely gutted interior, drag radials, a trans brake (and more) on a prepped surface, and it still can’t beat an EV family sedan.
Like it or not, ICE is clearly dead in the performance car segment.
And if the original price of the 2021 Model S Long Range is any guide, they know they can build a car faster than their Charger SRT Hellcat, for less money, with fewer employees, with more range and with better handling.
Better to sound fast than be fast?
Such as?LOL at the hyperbole.
Which performance car segment? The one requiring multiple laps? I think not.
Yet for auto workers, that future could be perilous. Factories will need fewer workers, mainly because electric vehicles contain 30% to 40% fewer moving parts than petroleum-run vehicles. In addition, many union jobs could shift to lower pay as automakers buy EV parts from supply companies or form separate ventures to build components.
They can put speakers on an EV and broadcast big engine sounds. They already do farts.Hard to beat the sound of a Hemi. So what if an EV is faster.
Such as?
Can’t be price. The Tesla started at $69,420 vs. $73,225 for a Charger SRT Widebody.
Can’t be range. 405 miles vs 278 miles. The Tesla is literally EIGHT times as energy efficient as a Charger SRT Widebody.
Can’t be acceleration. Dodge tried a thousand times in perfect conditions and only managed a 10.96 1/4 mile. 10.8 is pretty easy in a Model S LR.
And then comes the main reason manufacturers are switching to EVs - MONEY. It’s clear as day now that EVs can be built faster than ICE cars, with around 30% fewer employees. That means they’ll be more profitable for the manufacturers
Sources:
https://insideevs.com/news/449073/us-tesla-model-s-now-starts-69420/
Dodge.com
View attachment 78977
Fueleconomy.gov
View attachment 78978
https://www.moparmagazine.com/2019/12/2020-dodge-charger-srt-hellcat-widebody/
https://www.autoblog.com/amp/2021/02/13/uaw-uncertain-future-evs/
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rofit-potential-after-years-of-discouragement
Such as?
Can’t be price. The Tesla started at $69,420 vs. $73,225 for a Charger SRT Widebody. It only went up because demand is through roof (the waiting list is a 11 months currently).
Can’t be range. 405 miles vs 278 miles. The Tesla is literally EIGHT times as energy efficient as a Charger SRT Widebody.
Can’t be acceleration. Dodge tried a thousand times in perfect conditions and only managed a 10.96 1/4 mile. 10.8 is pretty easy in a Model S LR.
Absolutely. Less complex, fewer parts. Which is one of the reasons Tesla's half-assed approach to the luxury level of their interiors bugs me.And then comes the main reason manufacturers are switching to EVs - MONEY. It’s clear as day now that EVs can be built faster than ICE cars, with around 30% fewer employees. That means they’ll be more profitable for the manufacturers
That range will not be accurate (no Tesla comes even remotely close to their EPA figures). That's not to say the SRT mileage isn't abysmal, but the Charger will get better mileage on the highway, while the Tesla won't, it goes the other way.
Highway range for the Charger is 388 miles, while C&D got 320 miles from the Model S Long Range Plus:
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a36302930/tesla-model-s-long-range-plus-highway-range-testing/
According to Car and Driver, the Model S Performance will do a 10.6 (with Cheetah mode):
View attachment 78981
And was $108,000 as tested. Article on that car here:
https://www.caranddriver.com/review...el-s-performance-cheetah-mode-by-the-numbers/
The non-Performance version runs ~11.9 IIRC, unless they've significantly increased its performance with the "Plus" version?
This is a 2020 Model S Long Range, it ran an 11.9 @ 113Mph:
The Red Eye ran 11.5 at the same Mph as the Model S Performance, obviously traction limited being 2WD:
View attachment 78982
Absolutely. Less complex, fewer parts. Which is one of the reasons Tesla's half-assed approach to the luxury level of their interiors bugs me.
But you’re looking at the wrong cars. The Model S Performance and Long Range Plus you reference are old, obsolete models.
I’m talking about the 2021 Long Range that came out with the Plaid - they both share most parts and updates, even the same battery pack. You could buy it for $69,420 and will do 10.8.
Sorry Gents,
No EV will ever replace this sound for me. They may be fast and of the future, but the ICE sounds are irreplaceable.
Definitely. Tesla is a bit of a mess you could say.See my follow-up post, that car doesn't exist anymore, and I saw that video, that looks like a Model S Performance, and runs the same 1/4 mile. I've yet to see a video of the current Model S, it looks like things might have gotten a bit weird in 2021 with model transitions, but the Performance, that ran a mid 10 had a 0-60 of 2.4 seconds, the current offering has a 0-60 of 3.1 seconds, unless there's massive sandbagging between 0 and 60 in the current model, that $100,000 USD car isn't running a mid 10.
Weird. I asked how many laps and you responded with straight line speed. EV performance is a party trick. Go watch a Formula E race.
That Tesla is energy efficient, but not energy dense.
Beyond that, the “performance car” segment is so much more than straight line speed. Might EV’s get there? Sure, it’s likely we’ll be mandated that direction. Have EV’s eclipsed ICE because of a short term straight line advantage? No, and likely won’t until ICE is made illegal. Stop light racers have adopted Tesla’s, cool, I’ll pay attention when an EV finishes Le Mans or Monaco.
overkill addressed your claims far better than I can (on my phone with two thumbs).This thread was never about “laps”. You’re the only one talking laps times.
We’re talking Challenger and Charger. Possibly the two most drag strip/straight line oriented nameplates in history.
But I’ll give you that I really meant “Muscle Car” or Sports Sedan segment when I said Performance car.
Weird. I asked how many laps and you responded with straight line speed. EV performance is a party trick. Go watch a Formula E race.
That Tesla is energy efficient, but not energy dense.
Beyond that, the “performance car” segment is so much more than straight line speed. Might EV’s get there? Sure, it’s likely we’ll be mandated that direction. Have EV’s eclipsed ICE because of a short term straight line advantage? No, and likely won’t until ICE is made illegal. Stop light racers have adopted Tesla’s, cool, I’ll pay attention when an EV finishes Le Mans or Monaco.
Oh, absolutely. There are going to be "SRT" EV's in the very near future I suspect, and with AWD, will be able to put that power to the ground.Definitely. Tesla is a bit of a mess you could say..
What I’m getting at ultimately is that car was the biggest bargain Tesla ever sold, if you ordered one right away and got the intro pricing. A slightly slower Plaid with more range for under $70,000. If Tesla determined they could do it at a profit, Dodge probably thinks they can too with an EV Charger.
And to confuse things more. Regarding the screen shot you posted with 375 mile range, if you scroll
way down on that page and select the 19” wheels the range estimate goes back over 400 miles. Dumb on Tesla’s part not to default that page to the highest range/cheapest price configuration.
This thing is selling for 1700.00 dollars and is advertised as untouched. My Dad bought me a 53 Chevy. They were hard to peddle and they bobbed side to side.Here's a Chrysler!
If only it looked like a Mustang.Now if only Ford had an electric Mustang.......wait a minute.
And they are typically charged by fossil fuel plants. Between that and mining there is a big environmental impact.Just as an addendum to the above, it looks like they dropped the "Performance" and "Long Range Plus" versions of the S and the 0-60 time is now somewhere in between those versions (2.5 seconds for Performance, 3.7 seconds for Long Range Plus) at 3.1. Range has also gone down.
View attachment 78986
The price has also gone up to $99,940 (the above includes a discount):
View attachment 78987