Kinda; perhaps reread post #1. I took it to speak to VW's decisions moving forward to address their current business issues.Post is about VRs...not EVs.
I wish them well.
Kinda; perhaps reread post #1. I took it to speak to VW's decisions moving forward to address their current business issues.Post is about VRs...not EVs.
Look at the mess those 2 CEO's got VW into, does anyone really care what they have to say? The both of them are stone cold losers with a yellow streak a mile long (JMHO). What really needs to happen is for EV cars need to be left as alternative only not a replacement. Ev's don't provide any benefit over ICE vehicles, ICE cars have been very clean for a long time, the reduction of pollution is from having industry destroyed by lunatic green regulation and production gone primarily to China.You're kidding, right?
Mandates are another issue; they little to do with the high EV customer satisfaction.
Regardless, the lack of a competitive EV is one of VW's problems, according to CEO Blume. Before him, CEO Deiss said the same thing.
Perhaps VW would be in a better position had they pulled their heads outta the sand. That's the business case not a popularity case.
Normal people don't know what "VR6" means and that's the crowd VW chose to lean into.Notice too, VW puts "V6" on the back, not "VR6". I wonder why?
Perhaps you might consider CEO Winterkorn's mess of epic porportions? VW has made significant progress, but perhaps has never fully recovered from Dieslegate. It has certainly been costly.Look at the mess those 2 CEO's got VW into, does anyone really care what they have to say? The both of them are stone cold losers with a yellow streak a mile long (JMHO). What really needs to happen is for EV cars need to be left as alternative only not a replacement. Ev's don't provide any benefit over ICE vehicles, ICE cars have been very clean for a long time, the reduction of pollution is from having industry destroyed by lunatic green regulation and production gone primarily to China.
If you want to own an EV, no problem buy one but leave others the same option, I would bet you given the choice most people would say no thanks I pass.
The reason they badged these "V" and not "VR" is simply b/c folks didn't understand it and V6 is easier to grasp for most folks/easier to compare to other brands. They haven't badged them VR since MK4 days/early 2000s. In the end, it's a V6 with a single head b/c it's a narrow angle.EVs were mentioned earlier by some others. But you are correct, my bad!
Another picture of our VR6 Passat. Best thing about it is that VR6 coupled to the DSG.
Notice too, VW puts "V6" on the back, not "VR6". I wonder why?
Scott
View attachment 255268View attachment 255269
Even with being used to driving the modern turbo 4 VWs, my son's '98 GTI w/VR is very pleasing to drive...nice power band and sounds great.I test drove a VW Golf VR6 ages ago, and it was a blast. It felt a bit nose-heavy, but the power and agility definitely caught my attention. It wasn’t the most practical choice for me back then, but I still kind of wish I’d gone for it. Oh well, maybe I dodged a few speeding tickets—who knows?![]()
The Chinese market also contains a lot of very small and cheap EV'sI'm not surprised EVs are 40% of total car sales in China. But that's China. Don't most Chinese EV drivers live in densely populated/modern/urban environments with modern and and established electrical/charging infrastructure? Where are all these cars being driven?
Do the Chinese make long road trips in their country like Americans do in their country? My wife and I can drive thousands of miles in any direction and are able to get gasoline virtually anywhere, there are hundreds of hotel options, even more restaurant choices - and of course the National Parks System - all connected by modern interstate highways.
Do the Chinese have the freedom, desire, infrastructure, etc., to drive anywhere they want inside their own borders like Americans routinely do?
For whatever reason I think not, hence the popularity of EVs there.
Scott
Where did you get that? PM me if you cannot reply here.I badged my Atlas correctly haha...MK4 era font but whatever...removed the "V6" badge like any self-respecting VW fantatic would do!
View attachment 255277
Thanks for the question. Sorry My article didn’t download. It basically talked about the problematic nature of a one-head 6 cylinder engine. And after doing more research it seems the VR6 is a durable engine. I’ve owned 5 VW’s. However, my last one was a 1988 GTI that I put 18k miles on. It used oil (1qt/700 miles) and had piston slap at 3300-3800 rpm. My last VW. Although I still own a 1998 4 door e36 BMW M3 which has been remarkably reliable.WHat makes sense? How many VW's you owned and what issues you had?
No secrets....just google "VR6 badge" - got mine from ECS Tuning if I recall.Where did you get that? PM me if you cannot reply here.
Scott
I prefer the MK3 style myselfNo secrets....just google "VR6 badge" - got mine from ECS Tuning if I recall.
I disagree. It's still a V6 in the end (for me).The VR6 is much closer to an inline 6 than a V6.
Now I can pick you out of the crowd of soccer momsI badged my Atlas correctly haha...MK4 era font but whatever...removed the "V6" badge like any self-respecting VW fantatic would do!
View attachment 255277
Isn't the firing order the same as an I6?I disagree. It's still a V6 in the end (for me).
Me too. But nice non-the-less.I prefer the MK3 style myself