Volkswagen kills the VR6

The problem was and still is "dieselgate." It cost VW $42bln, and that money had to come from somewhere. They became too scared and started to make short-term decisions that now have serious financial effects.
1. They stopped investing in ICE. They were under the impression that EVs are coming super fast and that ICE is pretty much dead. EVs are on the decline in Europe and elsewhere (not China), and while the future is definitely EV, it will be some time. Trends and "coolnes" won't win the day. It needs to be a generational change. BMW 5 years ago said that their plan was to keep ICE until 2050, and that was at the time when everyone thought EVs would rule the roads in 2025. EU policy will change. There is too much economic instability created by Euro norms, and if the union wants to survive, they will have to start making compromises. WHile Europeans are more aware of climate change than here, going EV too fast will kill jobs super fast while not allowing other industries to absorb that workforce. Between climate change and paycheck, people will choose paycheck. It is really not that difficult choice.
2. They are the victim of dumb German energy policy. Clean at home, dirty beyond borders. Cheap Russian gas and belief that they can change Russia (because of arrogance, ego, hubris).
3. They panicked and started to make dumb decisions. Cheapened products (they ruined Audi). They have hybrid products in EU but they did not bring them to the US. The biggest mistake with Atlas was not that they put VR6, but that they did not put EA390 2.5 VR6 turbo DDPK and DDKA engine in American Atlas. 2.5 VR6 was tuned for 299hp and 369lb-ft of torque. We got an EA390 3.6ltr VR6 that was the thirsty engine in 2007, let alone in 2018. I drove that engine numerous times, checking it when I was on the market for Atlas, and I found that the 2.0T was far better suited here at altitude. If they went with a 2.5 VR6, they would have something unique, something for VW enthusiasts that want a bit more, because Atlas as a vehicle is, IMO the best family SUV when it comes to practicality. However, I think the issue I had with it (windshield cracking) is a consequence of this panic and creating a product too fast to fill the void in the market.
VW will survive, but the question is what is that going to look like? Oh and by the way, they just cut 35,000 jobs.
The rental Atlas I had(3.6) used more fuel than my truck...I wish I was kidding. I just couldn't understand how.
 
The problem was and still is "dieselgate." It cost VW $42bln, and that money had to come from somewhere. They became too scared and started to make short-term decisions that now have serious financial effects.
1. They stopped investing in ICE. They were under the impression that EVs are coming super fast and that ICE is pretty much dead. EVs are on the decline in Europe and elsewhere (not China), and while the future is definitely EV, it will be some time. Trends and "coolnes" won't win the day. It needs to be a generational change. BMW 5 years ago said that their plan was to keep ICE until 2050, and that was at the time when everyone thought EVs would rule the roads in 2025. EU policy will change. There is too much economic instability created by Euro norms, and if the union wants to survive, they will have to start making compromises. WHile Europeans are more aware of climate change than here, going EV too fast will kill jobs super fast while not allowing other industries to absorb that workforce. Between climate change and paycheck, people will choose paycheck. It is really not that difficult choice.
2. They are the victim of dumb German energy policy. Clean at home, dirty beyond borders. Cheap Russian gas and belief that they can change Russia (because of arrogance, ego, hubris).
3. They panicked and started to make dumb decisions. Cheapened products (they ruined Audi). They have hybrid products in EU but they did not bring them to the US. The biggest mistake with Atlas was not that they put VR6, but that they did not put EA390 2.5 VR6 turbo DDPK and DDKA engine in American Atlas. 2.5 VR6 was tuned for 299hp and 369lb-ft of torque. We got an EA390 3.6ltr VR6 that was the thirsty engine in 2007, let alone in 2018. I drove that engine numerous times, checking it when I was on the market for Atlas, and I found that the 2.0T was far better suited here at altitude. If they went with a 2.5 VR6, they would have something unique, something for VW enthusiasts that want a bit more, because Atlas as a vehicle is, IMO the best family SUV when it comes to practicality. However, I think the issue I had with it (windshield cracking) is a consequence of this panic and creating a product too fast to fill the void in the market.
VW will survive, but the question is what is that going to look like? Oh and by the way, they just cut 35,000 jobs.
^^^ One of the best posts ever. (y)
 
The rental Atlas I had(3.6) used more fuel than my truck...I wish I was kidding. I just couldn't understand how.
It is an old engine. It is an FSI generation engine (2003 generation). But even then, it was known to be thirstier than competition. Couple that with Atlas's size and stricter emission standards than 20 years ago, and you have a gas guzzler.
VW today has ICE engines that are generation old. They are trying to upgrade them constantly (like EA888). But the reality is that they were supposed to have new architecture some 3-4 years ago.
ANother thing that I forgot to mention in longer post is Audi in US.
VW and Audi are each other's worst enemies. If VW goes full throttle in the US market, the first victim is Audi. Why bother getting, let's say, Q7 when you can have Atlas? I think that was a dilemma and why Atlas ended up with 3.6VR6 and not 2.5VR6 or even 2.5 R5 from Audi. The same goes for Golf R, Golf GTI, etc. If VW offers the Uber Golf R, all it can be, the Audi S3 and RS3 are done.
 
We have the 3.6VR in out Atlas. Yes it's thirsty 🤣. City mpgs are ~16. Highway isn't bad..24 can be had but yes...not far off of a full-sized pickup. 5K lb towing is possible which is a plus of that engine over the 4s.
 
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a63247890/volkswagen-vr6-engine-production-end/

In a post on LinkedIn, Volkswagen communications manager Andreas Schleith announced the sad news that every water-cooled VW fan had been dreading: the VR6 engine is dead. Volkswagen built its final engine in this six-cylinder configuration on December 12, 2024, completing a total production run just shy of 1.87 million units.

*SNIP*

After exiting the U.S. market in 2023, the engine soldiered on in a few crossover applications in China, but these have now switched to four-cylinder powertrains. Building fewer standardized powertrains in its products is better for VW's bottom line, especially with the transition to EVs. With the company's current financial woes, the move to axe the VR6 permanently comes as little surprise.



Yet another sign of the times with a household name going to the dustbin in favour of tiny 4 cylinders and the anticipated transition to EV's.

I've never personally owned a VW (my sister has a VW SUV), but I understand that this engine had a bit of a following, so I'm sure it will be missed.
It had a very unique burble if you will. A couple of people locally had a 3.2 golf r32 and I could always tell when I heard it.
 
From a business standpoint, VW's problems include:
High production costs (labor + energy) resulting in poor margins. This makes them susceptible to market fluctuation (declining demand). "Cash is King" and VW has cash flow problems.
Management changes creating fostering lack of direction.

Oh yeah, and they are getting killed in the China market, which they are very dependent on. They need a competitive EV.

Everything changes.
When are you EV guys going to get the memo, the vast majority of people do not want these things for a multitude of reasons.
In Germany they killed off their most viable means of generating the enormous amounts of cheap electricity they had and now rely on outside sources for gas and other stupidity to generate the electric production. EV's are not the answer there and not for where I live either and will not be for many decades.

This has nothing to do with performance, we all know and have known for decades the electric motor is the best form of "engine" for power, low noise, etc but the problem is unlike fast 200 mph trains that get their power directly from the grid a car has to carry its own electricity and that is a huge problem in many places globally. Honestly I need an EV like I need a hole in my head from a #2 phillips.
 
The 2.5 turbo VRs that are/were used in China for the Terramont (Atlas) are sweet. Wish we would have gotten that here in the Atlas vs. the 3.6. A tuning company in Canada (HPA) has developed the gear to swap them in MK7 Golf Rs. Check out their YT for 2.5 VR swap content. I know a guy that is having one put in his Alltrack!

 
When are you EV guys going to get the memo, the vast majority of people do not want these things for a multitude of reasons.
In Germany they killed off their most viable means of generating the enormous amounts of cheap electricity they had and now rely on outside sources for gas and other stupidity to generate the electric production. EV's are not the answer there and not for where I live either and will not be for many decades.

This has nothing to do with performance, we all know and have known for decades the electric motor is the best form of "engine" for power, low noise, etc but the problem is unlike fast 200 mph trains that get their power directly from the grid a car has to carry its own electricity and that is a huge problem in many places globally. Honestly I need an EV like I need a hole in my head from a #2 phillips.
My post was based on VW's business issues, not a popularity contest.
Lack of a competitive EV is only one of VW's problems. According to CEO Blume, “Weak market demand in Europe and significantly reduced earnings from China reveal decades-long structural problems at Volkswagen.”

This is why I cited these issues. Regarding EVs, you may not want an EV, and that's fine, but VW's China demand problem shows others do. Blume has stated the company is facing significant challenges in its electric vehicle market. I wish CEO Blume luck.
 
I was in awe of it in a MKIV Jetta from an engineering standpoint in my youth. A luxury compact sedan with power to boot.
Loved mine, but for reasons most here would hate. PD100 and a wagon to boot. Not sure I want it back now, but it sure hit a sweet spot for me.
 
Have one.

1000027085.webp
 
My post was based on VW's business issues, not a popularity contest.
Lack of a competitive EV is only one of VW's problems. According to CEO Blume, “Weak market demand in Europe and significantly reduced earnings from China reveal decades-long structural problems at Volkswagen.”

This is why I cited these issues. Regarding EVs, you may not want an EV, and that's fine, but VW's China demand problem shows others do. Blume has stated the company is facing significant challenges in its electric vehicle market. I wish CEO Blume luck.
No they don't, they are having them shoved down their throat like it not. That is the only way to force these things on people, CA is doing the same thing.

https://news.mit.edu/2021/chinas-transition-electric-vehicles-0429
 
Our Cayenne w/VR6 is a nice drive. I don't complain about the fuel mileage, but it's not lifted or running larger than stock tires. They seem to have sticky piston rings like other VW engines. Ours is got to 1qt/1k mi or more all of a sudden, but HPL seems to be steadily reversing it. Luckily it wasn't the PCV...yet. Those are a standard pain point, and unnecessarily difficult to fix in the Cayenne. Here's fuel data, mostly 93. With a 26gal tank we've gone 630mi once on a tank.
1000006498.webp
 
No they don't, they are having them shoved down their throat like it not. That is the only way to force these things on people, CA is doing the same thing.

https://news.mit.edu/2021/chinas-transition-electric-vehicles-0429
China's only option to be competitive in the automotive industry are EVs. It is a hairdryer on four wheels. Wouldn’t be surprised if ConAir gets into business. Far less complicated product that doesn’t require institutional know-how in building engines and transmissions.
EVs are possible in China, where the majority of the population lives in a relatively small area with very good public transportation.
In the US, it is far from viable at this point. The problem is that the EV crowd is convinced that they know better and that there are no environmental drawbacks to EVs (absolutely not correct). I had this conversation over drinks a few weeks ago with one German until 5am (among other world problems we tried to resolve), and he is convinced we gonna all die in horrible death if we don't stop drilling for oil and that we really should only have 10% of today's world population. Of course, he is an avid Tesla fan (car, solar, house batteries). He does not see anything bad in people losing jobs because they can find another one (talking about being detached from reality) and banning ICE, etc. I heard that a lot in the EU, mostly rich EU countries. The problem is, of course, that that kind of thinking will eventually lead to political options that promise reversal of these standards, but those political options usually come with other baggage. The rise of AfD in Germany is not surprising and is directly correlated with EU mandates around emissions and everything else that led to the declining economy. The fact that in 2007, the EU had a 100 billion larger economy than the US and that it is now $10 trillion smaller is proof that they are in a downward spiral. VW is a victim of those policies, but they could do much more to save themselves.
I think their biggest flop is the US, not the Chinese market. The decline in the Chinese market could be absorbed to a certain extent in the US (BMW is an example). The fact that VW had a hybrid Tiguan in Europe 6 years ago, and not any hybrid, but a PHEV, and that they did not bring it to the US is a crime against all VW workers, shareholders, etc. Since Dieselgate, they don't have vision or courage and are victims of bureaucracy whose primary interest is always to bow to EU regulations and just muddle through. The Scholz government made the same mistakes as Merkel's. Instead of Russia, now they prop dictators and wannabe dictators in Europe in order to get to lithium while hoping the war in UKR will stop soon so they can again have cheap gas. I just cannot see how Germany, with this attitude, gets out of this mess they are in.
 
No they don't, they are having them shoved down their throat like it not. That is the only way to force these things on people, CA is doing the same thing.

https://news.mit.edu/2021/chinas-transition-electric-vehicles-0429
You're kidding, right?
Mandates are another issue; they little to do with the high EV customer satisfaction.

Regardless, the lack of a competitive EV is one of VW's problems, according to CEO Blume. Before him, CEO Deiss said the same thing.
Perhaps VW would be in a better position had they pulled their heads outta the sand. That's the business case not a popularity case.
 
it is what it is BUT if the manufacturers want a well built 4 banger with forced induction can make big power + torque safely if properly tuned!! todays DI has its issued but it allows more boost aka power + torque everywhere IF manufactures build a quality stout engine. go to the go APR tuning site to see the big gains that can be had with a more aggressive tune for not a lot of $$$
 
I'm not surprised EVs are 40% of total car sales in China. But that's China. Don't most Chinese EV drivers live in densely populated/modern/urban environments with modern and and established electrical/charging infrastructure? Where are all these cars being driven?

Do the Chinese make long road trips in their country like Americans do in their country? My wife and I can drive thousands of miles in any direction and are able to get gasoline virtually anywhere, there are hundreds of hotel options, even more restaurant choices - and of course the National Parks System - all connected by modern interstate highways.

Do the Chinese have the freedom, desire, infrastructure, etc., to drive anywhere they want inside their own borders like Americans routinely do?

For whatever reason I think not, hence the popularity of EVs there.

Scott
 
Back
Top