Dodge Durango 3.6L - HPL CK-4 5w-20 - 28,000 miles on oil - 168,000 miles total

wwillson

Staff member
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
6,835
Location
Colorado
This sample was pulled from my 2014 Dodge Durango with a total of 168,000 miles and 28,000 miles on the oil. The oil is HPL's 5w-20 CK-4 based formula and has been run since Feb 9, 2022, about 21 months. The lab is Wearcheck. The usage on this 9,300 mile run was >75% high speed driving down the interstate. There was 2/3 quart of makeup oil. The PCV valve was changed and oil consumption returned to zero until the oil filter/cooler started to leak again (this is not my happy face). All of the fuel used for this 9,300 mile run between samples was E-85. The oil filter had been in use for 4,500 miles and it won't be changed until the oil gets changed. Fe wear rate for this 9,300 miles was 0.65ppm/1k miles. The TBN is still at 6 so plenty of alkalinity left. Viscosity has increased to 12.6, which is barely into the SAE 40 range (12.5-16.29). Corrected Si is only about 8ppm, because there is some Si in this virgin oil. I see no need to change the oil now, so I'll probably run it a few thousand more miles. The oxidation number is way off, so Wearcheck is going to run the sample again, I will update the table when I get new data.

[edit-Nov 7, 2023] Wearcheck ran the oxidation again and found a value of 64.1 (was 17.9), which makes much more sense. The table below has been updated.

We saw the cleaning power of this oil in this bore scope thread.

Previous OUA thread:

PCV valve thread:


Sample Information
Sample DateFeb 2020Dec 2020March 2021August 2021October 2021February 2022March 1, 2022September 5, 2022April 19, 2023June 13, 2023October 28, 2023
Machine Age miles116,000122,200127,420132,679137,615140,000141,500147,000152,000158,700168,000
Oil Age miles5,00011,20015,82021,07926,0152,5001,5007,00012,00018,70028,000
Filter Age miles5,00011,20015,82021,0794,9362,5001,5002,0005,0006,7005,000
Oil Changednonononoyesyesyesnononono
Filter Changednononoyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
BrandHPLHPLHPLHPLHPLHPLHPLHPLHPLHPLHPL
Viscosity5w-20 HDEO5w-20 HDEO5w-20 HDEO5w-20 HDEO5w-20 HDEO5w-20 HDEO5w-20 HDEO5w-20 HDEO5w-20 HDEO5w-20 HDEO5w-20 HDEO
new formulanew formula
Wear Metals
Iron5132142621969151723
ChromiumTD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]2
2TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]1
Nickel000TD]
[TD]0
0TD]
[TD]0
0TD]
[TD]TD]
TitaniumTD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]2
TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]0
TD]
[TD]TD]
SilverTD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]0
TD]
[TD]0
00
Aluminum33155424158
Lead00TD]
[TD]1
TD]
[TD]1
10003
Copper310163966643165726964
Tin0TD]
[TD]0
TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]0
00TD]
Antimony00TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]-
------
VanandiumTD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]0
TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]0
TD]
[TD]0
TD]
[TD]TD]
Cadmium000TD]
[TD]not reported
000000
Additives
Boron181814243232022001
Barium30102000041
Molybdenum523521500518545535492548600590494
ManganeseTD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]2
31TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
Magnesium4624464304674611078109198111581059998
Calcium34223237320333793562281224312458276726452340
Phosphorus78877776075480211371094102410951041855
Zinc948924884949988132611761271141112711129
Contaminants
Silicon1111152533171213181720
Sodium445884035416
Potassium1TD]
[TD]2
34102234
Fuel %TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
[TD]TD]
GlycolNEGNEGNEGNEGNEGNEGNEGNEGNEGNEGNEG
Soot%0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10
Fluid Condition
TBN12.37.35.053.9852.851216.810.89.288.116
Viscosity8.89.19.49.5610.69.29.41010.411.612.6
Oxidation515.322.524.13145.30 (39.7)12(51.7)14.3(54.0)21(60.7)24.4(64.1)
[TD]
[TD]
[TD]
[TD]
[TD]
[TD]
 
Last edited:
So far, nothing to worry about. The wear rates are very good. The uptick in Al and Pb may just be incidental; best to just stay the course and see where they fall next time.

The correlation between oxidation (pending verification) and vis increase may or may not be of interest, depending upon the results of the updated ox value.

You had been doing UOAs about every 6k"ish" miles, and then went 9k miles this time. Was that just a fluke or planned? As the OCI matures, I would recommend keeping an eye on it; perhaps every 5-6k miles.

This is exactly the kind of performance I'd expect out of HPL!


At some point, I'd think considering BP filtration would be an excellent move.
 
You had been doing UOAs about every 6k"ish" miles, and then went 9k miles this time. Was that just a fluke or planned?
I just didn't get around to sending a sample in.

At some point, I'd think considering BP filtration would be an excellent move.
Someone would really have to twist my arm to get me to install a by-pass setup.
 
Hola My friend,

I got some good friends in Naperville. I'll be incline to change just like the comment from Overfill. If we get one those cold winters, I wonder what the oil will be at -10 below.
 
Lead at 3 ppm seems like a statistically significant increase considering it's been 0-1 for the previous ten UOAs. I'm not sure if that should be concerning, but it'll be interesting to see if it's increased further at the next UOA.
 
Interesting how wear materials measurements trend up and down on the same oil over time. I'd imagine how much measured deviation we would get as more of the same oil gets sampled overtime. Would it make a nice statistical study and shows there is noise going on?
 
Interesting how wear materials measurements trend up and down on the same oil over time. I'd imagine how much measured deviation we would get as more of the same oil gets sampled overtime. Would it make a nice statistical study and shows there is noise going on?

Perhaps read this ...

 
Interesting how wear materials measurements trend up and down on the same oil over time. I'd imagine how much measured deviation we would get as more of the same oil gets sampled overtime. Would it make a nice statistical study and shows there is noise going on?
Keep in mind that there are three drains in this table. Each is highlighted in a unique color. The short middle drain was a very short drain to get the old CJ-4 formula out.

1699321804548.jpg
 
Interesting that copper has sort of plateau'd.

Since it has gone up two grades, I'd be inclined to change it personally, just based on that fact (the oxidative thickening) but I understand your reluctance to, based on the health of the lubricant and remaining TBN.

“TBN doesn’t matter anymore these days, nobody cares about it, blah blah yada yada”

But now all the sudden, “oh lookie at all that remaining TBN 😍🤪


🤨😑 😤






(hashtag) TBN Numbers Matter 🤭🤓🥳
 
Back
Top