508 is ONLY 0W20. I don't think any 2022 VW calls for 502...all would be 504 or 508.Thats odd, I havent read the manual or looked at the sticker on it calling for 502.00 oil. Im pretty sure 508.00 is mostly 0w20.
508 is ONLY 0W20. I don't think any 2022 VW calls for 502...all would be 504 or 508.Thats odd, I havent read the manual or looked at the sticker on it calling for 502.00 oil. Im pretty sure 508.00 is mostly 0w20.
Can you post a picture of the sticker under the hood listing the required approval?2022!
If you haven’t done that when why did you even post here? That’s the bare minimum starting point.Thats odd, I havent read the manual or looked at the sticker on it calling for 502.00 oil. Im pretty sure 508.00 is mostly 0w20.
I hope you joking around and being humorous.This is why I don't care one iota about certs and approvals.
I think you missed the point and info in his post - buying oil from a company like HPL should alleviate the concerns w/r to approvals.I hope you joking around and being humorous.
I don't have a problem with blender who states that the oil meets or is recommended for certain spec. if oil meets the limits of physical and chemical requirements of given spec. If I am out of warranty I wouldn't mind but I still prefer to use approved oil.HPL isn't worried about customers who worry about approvals - like many other higher end manufacturers...Redline, Amsoil, etc. Even Liquimoly does the "recommended for" thing with their Molygen line. The only trick here is that some here on BITOG have to be careful with their rhetoric w/r to HPL and not have folks go back and find where they were giving advice to stick with approvals or were bad-mouthing oils that were only "recommended for" but now it's ok.....
Edit. Approvals are good. Approvals give the consumer confidence that the oil meets the manufacturer's requirements. For most folks, this is the way.
Here's the specific language HPL uses for their Euro 5W40:I don't have a problem with blender who states that the oil meets or is recommended for certain spec. if oil meets the limits of physical and chemical requirements of given spec. If I am out of warranty I wouldn't mind but I still prefer to use approved oil.
What I have a problem with when they say it exceeds the performance spec. How am I suppose to interpret that? Is such oil superior to actual spec? Or the oil go beyond the limits of given spec for physical and chemical requirements and therefore performs better than oil specified in owners manual?
Earlier in this thread I mentioned I was looking at HPL Euro 5W-40 (4/1Gallon jugs) and I was ok with cost.Here's the specific language HPL uses for their Euro 5W40:
View attachment 115807
Liqui Moly and HPL are two different things.HPL isn't worried about customers who worry about approvals - like many other higher end manufacturers...Redline, Amsoil, etc. Even Liquimoly does the "recommended for" thing with their Molygen line. The only trick here is that some here on BITOG have to be careful with their rhetoric w/r to HPL and not have folks go back and find where they were giving advice to stick with approvals or were bad-mouthing oils that were only "recommended for" but now it's ok.....
Edit. Approvals are good. Approvals give the consumer confidence that the oil meets the manufacturer's requirements. For most folks, this is the way.
Why’d you buy a 5w40 then?Thats odd, I havent read the manual or looked at the sticker on it calling for 502.00 oil. Im pretty sure 508.00 is mostly 0w20.
His general "distrust" towards lighter oils.Why’d you buy a 5w40 then?
Which to me is less of a concern than what the other parameters are of the required approval.His general "distrust" towards lighter oils.
Seems like 508.00 has more stringent wear protection requirements than 502.00.Which to me is less of a concern than what the other parameters are of the required approval.
I hope you joking around and being humorous.
If I knew the point you were trying to make, I'd give you a "Like" because it's a good line.Some people major on the minor and miss the importance of the important.
You are comparing two different grades. Not applicable as HTHS in 0W20 cannot provide the same protection.Seems like 508.00 has more stringent wear protection requirements than 502.00.
View attachment 115819
From that standpoint, yes. But is it possible that the engine wear tests were performed under the same environment for both specs?You are comparing two different grades. Not applicable as HTHS in 0W20 cannot provide the same protection.