Ford Explorer cargo space behind second row is 47.9 cu.ft. That’s less than GM’s offerings.
Ok, adequate power, thanks to the torque of electric motor.There is no good power in new Sienna.
Two thumbs up for the CX-90!The Mazda CX-90 is just now becoming available.
Power is in the eye of beholder.Ok, adequate power, thanks to the torque of electric motor.
I daily drive a nugget with double-digit horsepower at the wheels, so excuse me for considering the Sienna powerful when compared to my Hyundai nugget.
The Mazda is an example of packaging inefficiency. It’s the size of the larger midsize SUV with the interior space of the smaller Highlander.I would not let the fact that a model is brand new deter you from your decision. If the Grand Highlander fits the bill I would consider it.
The Mazda CX-90 is just now becoming available.
I think the Trailsport AT looking tires might take some away from the ride too compared to the other trimsWondering if they skimmed on insulation and rubber bushings connecting the driveline to the chassis.
I wish you would join the Mazda cult...I mean family!
Oops! I forgot. The first rule about Mazda cult is you don't talk about Mazda cult.There is no cult here. The Mazda was a suggestion but as the discussion has gone it’s apparent that the OP needs a bigger vehicle.
Trailsport comes with Continental Terraincontact which are considered most civilized in that “on road, sometimes light off road” segment.I think the Trailsport AT looking tires might take some away from the ride too compared to the other trims
Which engine is proven and reliable? The v6 or turbo 4?Atlas, a good solid and proven reliable engine and drive train, rust is not an issue with VW even in the salt belt.
Already joined in 18 with my Mazda 6. I think Mazda is about the best value and still a great car, but their SUVs are too small for our family car.I wish you would join the Mazda cult...I mean family!
Both.Which engine is proven and reliable? The v6 or turbo 4?
Are they easily maintained at home?
The VR6 and the 2.0 are both very reliable, for ease of maintenance the 4 is a little easier but neither are very difficult. The VR6 AFAIK will no longer be offered in 24 models.Which engine is proven and reliable? The v6 or turbo 4?
Are they easily maintained at home?
You’re right, they’re getting rid of the 6.The VR6 and the 2.0 are both very reliable, for ease of maintenance the 4 is a little easier but neither are very difficult. The VR6 AFAIK will no longer be offered in 24 models.
The 4 cylinder is a timing chain engine?The VR6 and the 2.0 are both very reliable, for ease of maintenance the 4 is a little easier but neither are very difficult. The VR6 AFAIK will no longer be offered in 24 models.
Plus one.I was never a VW fan until we bought our Atlas.
The ours has the 2.0T and it is huge, comfy, and quiet. 20k miles so far.
My whole hearted recommendation.