Originally Posted By: sayjac
Quote:
... I saw on a youtube video a guy showing the failure on a Purolator Synthetic. He ran it for 6300 miles, and the oil looked pretty good still, despite a small seperation at one end of the pleats.......
I've watched that same yt several times and other than the yt maker says 'uh ohh looks like we have a separation' I was unable to discern any specific separation nor did he further point to or identify the alleged specific separation area. As far as I could tell there was no separation or anything that would affect function. And later he says no leaks.
If we are talking about the same video on youtube then you pause the video at 1:55 seconds and you can see the seperation of pleats - minor, but its there. Given the oil pressure, i can not imagine all the oil passing through that small hole. But then, youtube also has videos of FRAM filters having holes. So, it comes down to issues being reported in BITOG. Something that i found strange in the BITOG Purolator Tear excel data is the fact that out of 61 reported cases as of todate, 59 have been reported in 2014. The manufacturing dates on 90% of these filters is 2011 or newer. So, it is odd that no reports are there from year 2012 or 2013. So, I suspect this has been a cumulative effect.... few people report problem with the Purolator/Bosch and soon we have a flood of people all testing their Purolator/Bosch filters - which obviously have a manufacturing issue. In my opinion, even 0.1% failure rate is unacceptable in an oil filter manufacturing process. One in 1000 is too many, given the number of cars on the streets. I wonder if Purolator will stand up and release their QA numbers and failure rates, in the face of this PR disaster. Would be especially useful on an important forum such as this, where oil pros congregate. Is there a Purolator rep in this forum ?
Quote:
... I saw on a youtube video a guy showing the failure on a Purolator Synthetic. He ran it for 6300 miles, and the oil looked pretty good still, despite a small seperation at one end of the pleats.......
I've watched that same yt several times and other than the yt maker says 'uh ohh looks like we have a separation' I was unable to discern any specific separation nor did he further point to or identify the alleged specific separation area. As far as I could tell there was no separation or anything that would affect function. And later he says no leaks.
If we are talking about the same video on youtube then you pause the video at 1:55 seconds and you can see the seperation of pleats - minor, but its there. Given the oil pressure, i can not imagine all the oil passing through that small hole. But then, youtube also has videos of FRAM filters having holes. So, it comes down to issues being reported in BITOG. Something that i found strange in the BITOG Purolator Tear excel data is the fact that out of 61 reported cases as of todate, 59 have been reported in 2014. The manufacturing dates on 90% of these filters is 2011 or newer. So, it is odd that no reports are there from year 2012 or 2013. So, I suspect this has been a cumulative effect.... few people report problem with the Purolator/Bosch and soon we have a flood of people all testing their Purolator/Bosch filters - which obviously have a manufacturing issue. In my opinion, even 0.1% failure rate is unacceptable in an oil filter manufacturing process. One in 1000 is too many, given the number of cars on the streets. I wonder if Purolator will stand up and release their QA numbers and failure rates, in the face of this PR disaster. Would be especially useful on an important forum such as this, where oil pros congregate. Is there a Purolator rep in this forum ?
Last edited: