Quote:
Guess at least some of the major auto manufacturers seem to think so. Heck, they could fill a Porsche a lot cheaper if they used non-synthetic. And think of how much Mercedes could save, and Saab, and even GM could save by putting junk oil into the Corvettes. Oh well, they must all be deluded.
****,
Nice try...
We all know why GM puts Syn in their Corvette, because its driven harder than a normal car and they did not want to put a oil cooler on the car.
The trucks get the close to the same engine without syn.. I guess my truck will die next week since I'm not running syn??
As far as Mercedes some of their engines DONT come from the factory with Syn and their Manual says NOTHING about syn...
Wonder why if Syn is soooooo much better?
I don't sell oil. I have NOT one iron in this fire. Just stating facts as I have seen in my life.
I don't have to justify spending $$ for oil that I don't need to run...
I drive more than the average person. I've run quite a few engines down the road with not a single problem in hundreds of thousands of miles. Other than a few ocis with Syn to PROVE (
see I have a open mind since I pay the extra $$ to run the syn and then even more to do a UOA ) what I'm doing (other than having many engines last) is correct.
I'm finding it so interesting that the Syn folks will not do a UOA with their syn then
try some conventional and do a UOA and see that their syn is worth the 2-3 times the cost.
If your running syn for long OCIs, excellent!
But go over to the UOAs and see how many are really running 10k-15k OCIs.. Not too many.
I've always said if your manual states to run Syn, DO it. (turbos, expensive cars and such)
But if you think that running syn for the oci that your manual states is going to get you longer life out of your engine, sorry... Not going to happen.
Go call your insurance agent and ask him if your car at 200k gets hit and totalled, since you've been running Syn you will get more $$ for it when they write the check.. correct?
Again, I'm not in the business to sell anyone a thing..
I post eveything I've done so nothing is a guess. If I'm getting long life out of engines that ran yesterdays cheap oils and fram fitlers, just think with todays excellent SL/SM conventional oils and better filters can do!
And I live where it gets cold (4700 ft valley floor) and have never had a problem starting with 10w-30 and now 5w-30 conventional oils.
In fact, my BEST uoa with my toyota came durning the coldest part of the year (and my car sits outside for 10-12 hours before getting started so its cold both times per day per start).
If conventional oil is so bad during the winter, would not the wear metals go WAY up for winter UOAs?
No, it does not get 40 below zero here.. But it does go in the minus and single digits alot.
As far as running clean, my Taurus was a Hertz rent a car for its first 21k of life. You know that it's oil was changed every 3k...
At 61k and 108k it was spotless. (no sludge, no varnish, nothing)
If conventional is so dirty how does that happen?
My truck gets too many short trips well under 2 miles and it's spotless.
The Jetta with 295k is super clean. Hopefully my sister in law will be coming up this Christmas and I'm going to go buy a valve cover gasket and take off the cover.. And take photos (am I sick or what?) and I'll post those!
But bottom line is for me, why spend $4-7 a quart of oil and I'll never run it out to the point where the cost meets the performance.
If I can run on sale oil for 4-5k ocis and have engines last as long as they have I'll continue doing that.
Take care all, bill