demarpaint
Thread starter
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Just beware of Internet amplification. Do you have a real count on the actual number of affected engines?
My sources are telling me it is from a specific batch that were not cleaned properly at casting and the problem was quickly rectified.
Then there's going to be the stealerships lousy repairs talked about afterwards!
I don't have any statistics, but it seems to be quite a few on the Wrangler boards. The improper cleaning was another totally different issue which impacted about 500 engines. It was caused by poor cleaning technique because the block has no freeze out plugs. They resolved that almost instantly and made it known. This problem is a defect in the head, or head design according to my sources. They also said quite honestly Chrysler isn't sure if the new head is going to fix it. Reading the boards confirmed that because there are a few people complaining after the head replacement. In this case time will tell. Hopefully is was only a bad run of a few heads.
Just beware of Internet amplification. Do you have a real count on the actual number of affected engines?
My sources are telling me it is from a specific batch that were not cleaned properly at casting and the problem was quickly rectified.
Then there's going to be the stealerships lousy repairs talked about afterwards!
I don't have any statistics, but it seems to be quite a few on the Wrangler boards. The improper cleaning was another totally different issue which impacted about 500 engines. It was caused by poor cleaning technique because the block has no freeze out plugs. They resolved that almost instantly and made it known. This problem is a defect in the head, or head design according to my sources. They also said quite honestly Chrysler isn't sure if the new head is going to fix it. Reading the boards confirmed that because there are a few people complaining after the head replacement. In this case time will tell. Hopefully is was only a bad run of a few heads.