Figured I would add qsud to it just for a comparison I got these figures from here hopefully it's the newest one let me know if Its not
http://www.epc.shell.com/Docs/GPCDOC_X_cbe_24855_key_140003587110_201007020123.pdf
Originally Posted By: randomhero439
Originally Posted By: Pablo
Originally Posted By: randomhero439
...... but PP beats out OE and XL anyday.
How are you so certain of these things? Please post the data. Not specifications, not thoughts, not certifications, not feelings. Real data.
All i have to work with is Spec Sheets. And from my view, PP looks better on paper. Man if everyone was asked to provide real data when making a claim, we would just run ourselves in circles. Most of us look at Spec Sheets, which i guess doesnt count as "real" published data. Your the Amsoil rep, how about you post some real data?
Note in my original post, i was refering to base-stock quality, nothing to do with additive packages.
............................(Amsoil OE) (Amsoil SS) (Pennzoil Platinum). Qsud
Viscosity index:_____166________170_________164. 175
Pour Point__________-48C_______-53C________-54C. -48
Flash Point_________224C________232C_______224C. 224c
CCS Viscosity:____5402cP______4979cP_____5720cP. 4840
Volatility_________12.6%________9.3%_______8.9% 14%
HTHS_______________2.7cP_______2.8cP______2.6cP. 2.6
Looks as though OE and SS have the advantage in CCS and HTHS. However the volatility is clearly superior with PP. To me, i would say OE