You didn’t answer to any of the points I addressed pertaining to your comments.Same obviously goes for you.I'm not as "biased" as you think, but because of your obvious Harley biased, you think anyone who says anything negative about them must be anti-Harly biased, lol. I've ridden a friends Harley, and didn't like it at all - heavy, under powered, ill handling, vibrated way too much ... that's reality from my perspective. Not my cup 'o tea as they say. Those who like 'em ... good for them, but I'd never buy one for what you get.
You mentioned performance, yet you can’t explain why there are no Gold Wings in police service or competing in police rodeo competitions?
You mentioned HD getting more technically advanced because they had to, yet failed to address my question of which motorcycle company hasn’t had to get more technically advanced? How is having to adjust valves in this day and age like you have to on a Gold Wing justified?
Do you want to address any of these issues that YOU brought up and implied that HD was falling short on?
Why does HD sell more heavyweight motorcycles than any other manufacturer? Maybe because they build a superior product that people want? That will last way longer than the disposable motorcycles made by the competition?
Try to twist sales figures all you want but people vote with their wallets. There’s a reason Toyota sells a lot of cars and Fiat doesn’t. Same applies here. Sorry your in the minority, but I’m guessing you don’t own a Fiat for a reason

I’m not biased. I’m simply correcting your disinformation and wow you are spewing a whole lot of it

One last thing. Pray tell us all what is your current ride? I’d like to get an idea on where your perspectives are coming from

Last edited: