Now had you written "with NO additional engine wear" I would tend to disagree with you.I've towed across the country on 5W20 conventional, with a max load, at 80 MPH, up the Ike Gauntlet, with NO engine damage.
Now had you written "with NO additional engine wear" I would tend to disagree with you.I've towed across the country on 5W20 conventional, with a max load, at 80 MPH, up the Ike Gauntlet, with NO engine damage.
Is this quantifiable? (no damage part) or based on UAO?
Also, another question, i know for Blackstone at least, their UOA "is it good or is it bad" is basically based on their past results, the history and averages of previous oil tests - my thoughts there being, is it possible that if everyone running (for arguments sake) 5w20 on an engine that specifies it, the UOA's will all show "OK" because everyone's wear averages will be similar.
You're doing UOAs. You have a large sump. You run an oil cooler.UOAs showed no issues.
In reality it’s a different word than “novice”. Same nonsense, same belligerent behavior (for no reason since the technical knowledge is lacking), just a different day and user name.Yeah OK. Novice.
You're on the right track.Also, another question, i know for Blackstone at least, their UOA "is it good or is it bad" is basically based on their past results, the history and averages of previous oil tests - my thoughts there being, is it possible that if everyone running (for arguments sake) 5w20 on an engine that specifies it, the UOA's will all show "OK" because everyone's wear averages will be similar.
I believe the cooler maintains the oil temperature well and thus I've never worried about using 5W20 lubricants.
"survive on 0W oils" is a bit off since that's the cold rating, so it depends more on the hot viscosity.
Yes, that is a cold rating, but that's what Valvoline calls it. It used to be called EXP140.
My friends old man would use it in his Olds powered Rail.
https://www.valvoline.com/our-products/pro-v-racing/sae-0w-oil
Didn't know you were referring to a race only oil used in non-street cars when referring to "0W" ... the context wasn't there either.
The engineering explainer shouldn't have ended that soon. Ended as if the grades would tell as much as we want to know. LS and Blackwing may require 0W-40 per instructions, at the same time these are boiling down into thickening 20s and 30s territory.
https://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/2017-corvette-mobil-1-esp-0w40-7-1k-miles.324876/
He could have shown Alfa and Amsoil for GM and Mobil 1 to go on explaining:
Permanent viscosity loss should be half as interesting as temporary viscosity loss, but a bit of indication for the latter as well. And questioning any need for so much fight over this explaining guy's embottled grades at he same time. There's no longer enough to be had from simplistic grades, with modern freedom of recipes and engines making 20s from 40s within an OCI, right?
Just an example responding to Ed's comments.
Of course not. It's a high performance engine. No manufacturer that produces high performance engines recommend 0W20 in their engines.
Who's to say the ECM is not programmed differently or they use a that different VCT (cam phaser) calibrated to that weight of oil?All 2015+ Mustangs with the Coyote sold in Australia specify 5W-30.
Who's to say the ECM is not programmed differently or they use a that different VCT (cam phaser) calibrated to that weight of oil?
What's that have to do with parts sliding past each other and wearing with a thin film of oil between them to keep them separated? Nada.
Yes there are engines in the US that are overseas and is spec'd differently in other countries but who's to say the ECM is not programmed differently or they use a different VCT (cam phaser) calibrated to that viscosityof oil?All 2015+ Mustangs with the Coyote sold in Australia specify 5W-30.