Why or why not Mercedes-Benz?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: andrewg
Boxster is out of my price range. Yes, very nice car. 255hp minimum. But a new base model starts at $48k and very quickly goes up from there. Even if I leased one I'd be looking at over $800 a month. A used one? I really don't want used. But even then, unless you go back to about 2008 and get a basic model they still go for about $37k. Too much for used and I wouldn't want an older car.

I did a quick scan on Autotrader. You can get a low mileage 2009 certified (by Porsche) Boxster for under $40K (asking price) with 3 years of Porsche warranty still remaining. I guess it really depends on what you're looking for. If driving dynamics is important to you, you should really take the Boxster for a spin, just to get a better understanding of how it stacks up, if nothing else. The SLK will sacrifice driving dynamics for luxury/comfort. Again, not bad, just depending on what your priorities are.
 
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: andrewg
Boxster is out of my price range. Yes, very nice car. 255hp minimum. But a new base model starts at $48k and very quickly goes up from there. Even if I leased one I'd be looking at over $800 a month. A used one? I really don't want used. But even then, unless you go back to about 2008 and get a basic model they still go for about $37k. Too much for used and I wouldn't want an older car.

I did a quick scan on Autotrader. You can get a low mileage 2009 certified (by Porsche) Boxster for under $40K (asking price) with 3 years of Porsche warranty still remaining. I guess it really depends on what you're looking for. If driving dynamics is important to you, you should really take the Boxster for a spin, just to get a better understanding of how it stacks up, if nothing else. The SLK will sacrifice driving dynamics for luxury/comfort. Again, not bad, just depending on what your priorities are.

Thank you. I will take a second look. It won't hurt to compare a truly superior roadster to the rest of the crowd. Maybe when I am ready to buy a Boxster with a great price will be available. If not, at least I will be able to use the car test drive as something to be compared with.
 
IMO a Boxter or Cayman offer a FAR better set of vehicle dynamics than a Merc.

Almost not comparable in my world. But you really should drive one, as they offer one of the best trade offs between ride and handling out there.

You just have to learn to like the packaging.
 
Not really a big fan of the SLK, I'd hunt for a used SL, since the new ***** one is out $40k should get you a nice SL that's at a really comfy point on the depreciation curve.

SLK's are not really anything special, unless you get the AMG version than they are OK I guess.

What about a slightly used E class cab? Those look like pretty decent cars.

Different car manufactures do better in certain areas. Mercedes makes its best cars in the E class and up range, mostly up. BMW does its best work in the 5 series and down range. The C's and SLK's are just entry level cars, nothing really special to write home about, IMHO BMW covers this range with better cars.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Astro14
I've owned a couple of MBs - nothing newer than the '92 in my sig. I've driven several newer ones, including a few 2012 models (thank you Hertz!)

They are wonderfully engineered cars, better design, materials and execution than almost anything on the road. The cost of purchase is high, but it's a myth that the cost of parts is high, that really depends on the part. As an example, I bought a head gasket kit, which included seals, intake & exhaust manifold gaskets, and all of the several other gaskets needed for the job. I got it over the counter at the local MB dealer for about $100. That's not out of line with any other make.

But MB parts are where the company really shows how different it is: you can get parts for any MB ever made. Ever. Unlike every other car manufacturer out there, they will always have parts for your car.

So, if you're going to keep it forever (like some owners do), then MB is what you want...


This was a big shock for me when I started to switch over to GM. After a few years the GM dealer doesn't want to sell you parts and a little plastic part costs a fortune.

With MB you can buy any part for any car they have ever made, and they don't jack up the prices like GM does.

I was used to being able to walk into a dealer and get an oddball trim part in a day or two for a few bucks for a 30 year old car, can't do that with GM.
 
Originally Posted By: andrewg
Originally Posted By: Astro14
I've owned a couple of MBs - nothing newer than the '92 in my sig. I've driven several newer ones, including a few 2012 models (thank you Hertz!)

They are wonderfully engineered cars, better design, materials and execution than almost anything on the road. The cost of purchase is high, but it's a myth that the cost of parts is high, that really depends on the part. As an example, I bought a head gasket kit, which included seals, intake & exhaust manifold gaskets, and all of the several other gaskets needed for the job. I got it over the counter at the local MB dealer for about $100. That's not out of line with any other make.

But MB parts are where the company really shows how different it is: you can get parts for any MB ever made. Ever. Unlike every other car manufacturer out there, they will always have parts for your car.

So, if you're going to keep it forever (like some owners do), then MB is what you want...

So by saying this: "They are wonderfully engineered cars, better design, materials and execution than almost anything on the road". Can you elaborate further? What do you feel makes this statement valid. Not trying to be a pain here....but I am interested in a bit more detail and explanation. I've certainly heard what you are saying about MB....but being ignorant of the details can you tell me a bit more?


High quality castings in the engine. Bushings that last 200K. Interior materials that look good after decades (MB-tex). Quality steel that resists rust. Fine thread bolts where strength is needed. Here's one: changing the headlight (sealed beam) on a W-123 requires loosening 3 screws, but they're not the 3 crummy little rusty sheetmetal screws that fall on the ground, or strip out when you try to loosen them...oh, no...they're long, threaded screws that are solidly mounted in threads mounted at an angle to the bezel, so they can be easily loosened, releasing the bezel while they stay attached and secure, making the task easy...the engineer who designed this thought about the future owner...and used a clever design, solid construction and good materials that will last...
 
Originally Posted By: andrewg
In about two years I am planning on getting a new convertible roadster. My desire is to get Mercedes-Benz SLK250. I'd get the 350(6 cyl.), but the cost is out of my budget. In the past I've owned a 2006 Mazda Miata MX5 and VERY much loved the car. An all new model is actually due out late next year. My reasons for wanting the Mercedes over the MX5 are multiple. One, I like the prestige (sounds corny....but I've never owned a car that had any and at my age I'd like to feel that I've at least achieved some level of success). Secondly, and the question I am asking those reading my post, is about Mercedes-Benz quality. Are Mercedes really quality cars? If so....in what way specifically? Are they built in any special way or use any special materials over other cars? I hear that they are 'better'....but I honestly want to know WHY they are....or why they may not be. I know about the reliabilty being perhaps not as good as some asian makes...but that's not my question. And I know why a Rolls-Royce is quality....or Ferrari....but what makes a Mercedes-Benz any better?
Thank you in advance for any help.....and PLEASE...I don't want snide, rude, or insulting remarks to have any part of my thread.


We just bought a 2000 SL500 (R129).

We looked at an MX-5, and had a great price on one. We looked at Audis, BMWs, Volvos, Porsches, and Mustang convertibles (I have trouble fitting into some Vette ragtops). We wanted an R129 for over 20 years. The SL won out. We found one that was as low mileage as one could ever find, and jumped on it.

No comparison between R129 and MX-5. The Miata is fun and carves corners like my grandfather carved a turkey. But the SL is like driving a bank vault on wheels -- a [censored] fast one at that. Under 40mph, it's like a one-car parade. And over 70mph, it becomes something entirely different. It jumps between the two in a couple eye winks. The Miata seems more like a go-kart next to it. And I would NOT want to be in one in a serious accident. I feel we will get out of the SL alive. I would not want to be in a Miata for a cross-country trip. We can't wait to take one in our SL.

The R129 was the last of the "Mercedes" big SLs, before DC started cutting corners in a more serious way starting in 2003. Overbuilt and over-engineered. It has a bit of a cult following at this point, and a community of owners that has figured out most of its flaws and issues. It tends to be more reliable than its successor. Prices could not be better from a buyer's standpoint. We bought our 14k '00 for right around $20k. I think a new Kia goes for that. It was a $95k car new.

But to own one is not an exercise in thrift. Be prepared to pay well just for basic maintenance (a set of plugs is over $100), to pay more dearly if someone else does it, and pay painfully if something serious breaks. I'm happy to say that the major drivetrain items are fairly bulletproof on them. It's the things like top hydraulics and some electrical items that will murder your wallet if they go. We've already poured a couple k$ into ours, mostly for discretionary items (better tires, unscheduled fluid flushes, re-covered steering wheel, etc.). It takes 8.5 quarts of good oil and a $20 filter. And over 20 gallons of $4 premium to fill (once the $130 sender was replaced), for which it has great thirst.

All that aside, a perfect R129 is pure joy in motion to be behind the wheel. I can think of few other conveyances for me and my wife on a perfect spring or fall afternoon. To us, it's all worth it when that nifty top comes down (which is a little show in itself).

I'm sure the SLK250 is all of that, on a slightly smaller scale.

If you can afford one, and not just to buy one, I say GO FOR IT.
 
Originally Posted By: andrewg
Originally Posted By: Astro14
I've owned a couple of MBs - nothing newer than the '92 in my sig. I've driven several newer ones, including a few 2012 models (thank you Hertz!)

They are wonderfully engineered cars, better design, materials and execution than almost anything on the road. The cost of purchase is high, but it's a myth that the cost of parts is high, that really depends on the part. As an example, I bought a head gasket kit, which included seals, intake & exhaust manifold gaskets, and all of the several other gaskets needed for the job. I got it over the counter at the local MB dealer for about $100. That's not out of line with any other make.

But MB parts are where the company really shows how different it is: you can get parts for any MB ever made. Ever. Unlike every other car manufacturer out there, they will always have parts for your car.

So, if you're going to keep it forever (like some owners do), then MB is what you want...

So by saying this: "They are wonderfully engineered cars, better design, materials and execution than almost anything on the road". Can you elaborate further? What do you feel makes this statement valid. Not trying to be a pain here....but I am interested in a bit more detail and explanation. I've certainly heard what you are saying about MB....but being ignorant of the details can you tell me a bit more?


Quite a few differences:

1. Once you get used to German cars and sorry I'm not counting VW/Audi, they are a joy to work on. MB, BMW, and Porsche all have their own way of doing things but once you figure it out, its a breeze. I just helped my friend pull a starter on a W140 S600 which looked challenging until I figured out how the engineer who built it wanted you to take it out. He left just enough room for me to get a socket extension past the transmission bell housing. Its hard at first but once you get into that German mindset you can figure out most jobs, it always seems like some engineer moved something just a bit so you can swing a wrench.

Or pull a door panel off the wiring is brilliant, on my Silverado its hacked in and a rats nest, everything rubs, on a MB its a proper loom like you see in a good boat, like a Cabo. All the interior panels on my W126's were not plastic, but aluminum wrapped in vinyl. All the wood on the inside is an aluminum core veneer to save weight and increase safety in a crash.

These days they make some good stuff, but the older MB's are so far beyond what everyone else was doing at the time. A good example is look at some of the POS weld joints you see in American cars in the 60's and 70's, they are horrible. In a MB they are laser straight and perfect. You can tell the guys at the factory wanted everything right even if no one would ever see it.

Or on my friends G wagon which is still a hand built truck in Austria. Close the door and it sounds like closing a safe.

It adds up overtime; after 280k miles when I sold my last S class the engine still didn't burn a drop of oil, the transmission was original and shifted fine, and it didn't have one rattle inside, solid as the day it was made. It would still run at 100+ without much effort.

I appreciate them after all these years because even with all their annoying issues and they do have a few, they were and I think to a large extent still are so far beyond what a normal car has to offer in all areas. They are like aircraft if you keep up on them they will run forever, especially the older ones were designed to be rebuilt.

Or to put it another way my buddy has both MB's and Ferrari's. He drives the MB's because as he says the F cars are fragile attention whores who break every 5 minutes. But his tuned MB's are faster than most of the F cars, and they run to mileages that F cars can't without a rebuild...or two...
 
Last edited:
Talking about closing doors, I drove three or four 2010 E350 4Matics recently. Sadly, that door closing sound was not present or at least it seemed just like all the other cars that I was shopping.
 
Originally Posted By: hattaresguy


1. Once you get used to German cars and sorry I'm not counting VW/Audi, they are a joy to work on. MB, BMW, and Porsche all have their own way of doing things but once you figure it out, its a breeze....Or pull a door panel off the wiring is brilliant,...


Meh....
21.gif


It's a mixed bag. Sometimes you go, "Oh! wow...that makes sense." Sometimes it just looks like servicing that part was not really thought about beforehand.

Germans do tend to use blind fasteners and multiple sizes and styles of fasteners on one panel...but like you said, VW/Audi are by far the worst offenders

But I do like being able to run 1/0 AWG amplifier power wire through the firewall on a Mercedes Benz without any drilling and grommeting. Just lift up the fuse box and pull out the mini Hefty garbage bag full of sponges.

2012-03-09_12-14-38_234.jpg


But back on the SLK. My brother in law had a 2009 SLK350...allegedly the first '09 East of the Mississippi River. Anyway, I didn't get to drive it 10/10ths. It wasn't my car. But I didn't get a Miata-esque impression from it. More like a 350Z Roadster with automatic and slightly less understandable dash controls and shift selector. He complained about the power retractable hardtop squeaking on occasion (that he could never duplicate for the dealer to isolate) and mostly that it was undriveable in snow (put some snow tires on it and let Lake Erie bring it's worst for crying out loud!) I liked the car. I liked it's arrow styling and even the big pie-plate size star in the grill. I thought it drove well. Fun....a lot of fun for an automatic roadster.
 
Originally Posted By: Vikas
Talking about closing doors, I drove three or four 2010 E350 4Matics recently. Sadly, that door closing sound was not present or at least it seemed just like all the other cars that I was shopping.


If you really want the classic MB experience, you either need to find an older one, or stick with the S class models.

The current Cs and many Es just don't cut the mustard, from my recent visits to several dealers. They've come down to market on those, IMO.

To my recollection, the last "moderate-priced" Merc that still had the high build quality was the late '80s 190.
 
There was a fabulous 2007 S-class in the showroom. The asking price was $45K. Something about the interior, especially brushed aluminum switchgear looked out of place. It was like a blend from 50s and 00s i.e. more bling than the class.
 
Originally Posted By: Volvohead
Originally Posted By: Vikas
Talking about closing doors, I drove three or four 2010 E350 4Matics recently. Sadly, that door closing sound was not present or at least it seemed just like all the other cars that I was shopping.


If you really want the classic MB experience, you either need to find an older one, or stick with the S class models.

The current Cs and many Es just don't cut the mustard, from my recent visits to several dealers. They've come down to market on those, IMO.

To my recollection, the last "moderate-priced" Merc that still had the high build quality was the late '80s 190.


While the W124 wasn't "moderate-priced" at the time, it was a very well built car and I wouldn't hesitate to recommend one. Lots of examples out there, look for one with good maintenance history and condition, many have led abused lives...the "thunk" of the doors, the solid nature of the body in my step-son's 300E are part of the MB experience. It's a nice riding, nice driving, car...I am casually shopping for a V-8 example of the W124...
 
Originally Posted By: Vikas
There was a fabulous 2007 S-class in the showroom. The asking price was $45K. Something about the interior, especially brushed aluminum switchgear looked out of place. It was like a blend from 50s and 00s i.e. more bling than the class.


You can change that, its a personal color choice, like carbon fiber trim vs wood, etc.

Oh and as to the doors, go find a G wagon and report back. They import less than 500 a year so most dealers don't carry them.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: andrewg
.... My reasons for wanting the Mercedes over the MX5 are multiple. One, I like the prestige (sounds corny....but I've never owned a car that had any and at my age I'd like to feel that I've at least achieved some level of success). Secondly, and the question I am asking those reading my post, is about Mercedes-Benz quality. Are Mercedes really quality cars? ...


For a number of reasons, I don't think comparing a Mazda to a Merc has any validity.

Prestige is a dubious reason to buy a car. Personally, I would buy on the basis of some other quality or qualities that you really like about the car. In five or six years, no matter how expensive the car, it's just another used car and totally devoid of prestige. So you really want some other reason to have it around, imo.

My sister had one of the 190 series Merc's that suffered hard part internal engine failures, not once, but twice, which to me is simply unheard of in a modern car and totally unacceptable. German cars for the most part really don't interest me at all, so that's about all I know about them.
 
Originally Posted By: Astro14
While the W124 wasn't "moderate-priced" at the time, it was a very well built car and I wouldn't hesitate to recommend one.


I won't disagree with you. The W124 is a great chassis . . . the R129 is based off it.

All the best in your hunt for that 500E.
 
Originally Posted By: Win
Originally Posted By: andrewg
.... My reasons for wanting the Mercedes over the MX5 are multiple. One, I like the prestige (sounds corny....but I've never owned a car that had any and at my age I'd like to feel that I've at least achieved some level of success). Secondly, and the question I am asking those reading my post, is about Mercedes-Benz quality. Are Mercedes really quality cars? ...


For a number of reasons, I don't think comparing a Mazda to a Merc has any validity.

Prestige is a dubious reason to buy a car. Personally, I would buy on the basis of some other quality or qualities that you really like about the car. In five or six years, no matter how expensive the car, it's just another used car and totally devoid of prestige. So you really want some other reason to have it around, imo.

My sister had one of the 190 series Merc's that suffered hard part internal engine failures, not once, but twice, which to me is simply unheard of in a modern car and totally unacceptable. German cars for the most part really don't interest me at all, so that's about all I know about them.


I think my comparison is valid. They are both roadsters....two seats....convertible....reasonably 'sporty'....plus similar and transmission and number of cylinders. But you can certainly have that opinion. I do realize they are different cars...including weight and some handling characteristics. But certainly not an invalid thing to compare the two.
Your statement that I have a 'dubious' reason to choose a car is just another opinion. Many of use choose cars for many reasons. I would not pick a Mercedes-Benz if after test driving it I found it to feel cheap or common. That's why I have asked the quality questions here. I have heard that they ARE quality....I wanted to know why. I would like to drive a vehicle that is also at a level perhaps ABOVE the common vehicle. I don't find that reason 'dubious'.
To each his own I suppose.
 
Last edited:
I work for a billionaire. We are trending away from Mercedes cars and SUV's. The main problem is poor reliability. I work in the flight department, but I am on a first name basis with the service rep at the merc dealership. It's that bad. Little things you may. It have thought of.

European cars contain recyclable content (by law) . Our SUV was blowing black foam out of the AC vents. The foam was deteriorated and turned to goo. It was impossible to clean it off surfaces and clothing. Same goes for the plastics used on the dash and glove box. Deteriorating. Actually, the term used by the dealership is "reverting". As in reverting back to its native state. It's a real problem in South Florida, with year round heat.

Same goes for rubber hoses and lines. The power steering hose blew on me after 2 years. It was rotten! The windshield squirters "reverted" too. It's been a real battle. To the tune of about $2000 per month at times.

Quality? Nope.
 
Originally Posted By: andrewg
I think my comparison is valid. They are both roadsters....two seats....convertible....reasonably 'sporty'....plus similar and transmission and number of cylinders. But you can certainly have that opinion. I do realize they are different cars...including weight and some handling characteristics. But certainly not an invalid thing to compare the two.
Your statement that I have a 'dubious' reason to choose a car is just another opinion. Many of use choose cars for many reasons. I would not pick a Mercedes-Benz if after test driving it I found it to feel cheap or common. That's why I have asked the quality questions here. I have heard that they ARE quality....I wanted to know why. I would like to drive a vehicle that is also at a level perhaps ABOVE the common vehicle. I don't find that reason 'dubious'.
To each his own I suppose.

Drive both, its not really a good comparison, they are in different worlds.

You need to test drive a good Mercedes convertible though, like an SL, or SLS. They SLK isn't really an expensive car so they can only do so much and still sell them at a price point. An SLK55 AMG might be Ok.

Stomp your foot on a V12 SL, or an SLS AMG and I guarantee the MX5 will be forgotten about.
 
I realize a MB SLK of any kind compared to a Mazda MX5 is not a GOOD comparison. But it is valid in terms of what I want from a roadster. There is no need for me to test drive a higher end Mercedes than a base model SLK however as I would never be able to afford an SL or an AMG. I would be wasting my time AND the sales persons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom