Or maybe it's because chains are superior...Conservative design that pushed no limits?
Or maybe it's because chains are superior...Conservative design that pushed no limits?
Wouldn’t a good question be ONE that there isn’t a general answer to? One that can be discussed, debated and answered in the best terms available to people experiences?Don't agree on that. Not a good question since there's no general answer to it.
Some cars (and chains) are happy with 10,000 mile OCI under certain (not too
hard) conditions while some cars (chains) require 5,000 mile OCIs under certain
(harder) conditions. Does it help anyone? Probably not. We need to debate the
issue individually each time. I don't even mentioned sort of oil and filter or the
question how long you want to own the car.
.
Wouldn’t a good question be ONE that there isn’t a general answer to? One that can be discussed, debated and answered in the best terms available to people experiences?
A well maintained car. Congrats.All this talk about guides and buffers wearing out. How is it my Corolla is still on the original timing chain, and all of its associated parts, with 423K miles and never needing any repairs?
Vehicles with TBs can be maintained just as well, but will still require TB replacements...A well maintained car. Congrats.
and other work too.Vehicles with TBs can be maintained just as well, but will still require TB replacements...
Nah.Or maybe it's because chains are superior...
On some V8 Audi cars it is about 32+ hrs labor to remove the engine and replace the chains if no broken, rotten bolts are encountered on an old car, that does not include any additional items like oil, filter, coolant, belts, hoses, seals etc. the chain and guides are over 5 grand at the dealer. This is a 10K+ job, nothing for the shade tree, it is a job for an A mechanic with the equipment and tools.Chains are not maintenance free in many cars.
They can require regular replacement and some are extraordinarily expensive to replace when the time comes. Modern Audis, for example. Timing chain on some Audis is several thousand dollars.
Some classic Mercedes V-8s require engine removal in order to replace the chain, and it's good for about 100,000 miles. Engine removal to do a chain is a whole lot more than that Honda mechanic was going to charge you for a belt!
My 1970 Ford had a 302 V-8 that jumped time due to timing chain wear. Small block V-8. Jumped a tooth (took a while to figure out my no start condition, that's another story). A stout chain, made of steel, running on steel gears, but with nylon buffers to quiet it down. Nylon wore out and it failed at about 120,000 miles.
The "Good ole' days of timing chains" weren't all that good when you look closely.
On some V8 Audi cars it is about 32+ hrs labor to remove the engine and replace the chains if no broken, rotten bolts are encountered on an old car, that does not include any additional items like oil, filter, coolant, belts, hoses, seals etc. the chain and guides are over 5 grand at the dealer. This is a 10K+ job, nothing for the shade tree, it is a job for an A mechanic with the equipment and tools.
Complete Timing Chain Kit - ultimate
Everything need to get the job done including the upgraded RS4 metal guide rail!www.ecstuning.com
I'll take my chances with chains. I've never needed to replace one, or any of their associated parts...
Only if they're badly designed, or ingest a foreign object.Gears go bang too.
That was a common failure mode of circa 1960s Big 3 V8s at around that same mileage, even if well maintained. A friend had that happen on both a 289 Ford and a 318 Dodge. Many Pontiacs did it, too....My 1970 Ford had a 302 V-8 that jumped time due to timing chain wear. Small block V-8. Jumped a tooth (took a while to figure out my no start condition, that's another story). A stout chain, made of steel, running on steel gears, but with nylon buffers to quiet it down. Nylon wore out and it failed at about 120,000 miles.
The "Good ole' days of timing chains" weren't all that good when you look closely.
My 1970 Ford had a 302 V-8 that jumped time due to timing chain wear. Small block V-8. Jumped a tooth (took a while to figure out my no start condition, that's another story). A stout chain, made of steel, running on steel gears, but with nylon buffers to quiet it down. Nylon wore out and it failed at about 120,000 miles.
The "Good ole' days of timing chains" weren't all that good when you look closely.
My comment was only in regard to most modern engines being interference engines which in itself carries a certain amount of risk. As I said in my other post in this thread I don't have a preference for belt or chain. They each have advantages and disadvantages.Huh?
Where are the trashed cars all over with cracked pistons, due to tb failing?
Statistically it’s low because belts are designed for the long term, kept clean and out of the elements, and don’t fail even when abused for tens of thousands of additional miles over the maintenance interval (like OP’s condition).
The aggregate risk of an interference engine and a failed belt is low as far as I can tell.
Guide‘s cracking, chains stretching due to wear, sprocket wear, chain tensioner failure, oil leaks from covers, increased cost of repair.Because in the vast majority of cases chains never need to be replaced. Belts always do. It's not rocket science...