Not necessarily.....BUT.in some states , a car jacking is grounds for the use of deadly force.
you guys have Baltimore and having a duty-to-retreat-if-safe applies outside the home.If I shot someone here in Maryland for pretty much anything nefarious, my life would probably be permanently ruined.
Yes I know. And fortunately I am out of Baltimore by a good bit. I will not go there.you guys have Baltimore and having a duty-to-retreat-if-safe applies outside the home.
I think it is pretty safe to say, if one is ever in a situation to shoot anyone, their life will probably change for the worse for at least some time afterward, even if it was totally justifiable.If I shot someone here in Maryland for pretty much anything nefarious, my life would probably be permanently ruined.
Just an observation. You're looking at the situation with 20/20 hindsight. In the moment, at that time, do you think you could have made the decision that the lunatic wasn't trying to run someone over?The situation would have been even more lunatic with some helpful gunman firing very low-percentage shots at the guy in the moving car with all those bystanders around. Bystanders who inexplicably keep moving toward the car. There's no suggestion that the driver was trying to run over people on purpose, and indeed no people were hit.
CUJ,I tend to want to avoid such situations. The farther away I am, the better.
Someone that sees an easy target that won't fight back or do anything to stop them.Watching the video, if I saw it correctly, the victim was a elderly person wuth significant physical issues, very easy for all to see. Who in the world would target a person like that?