Valvoline and any other big oil maker knows what the Noack is because they will measure it in their lab.I’m not sure it’s published. I think it’s estimated based off others’ Noack.
Valvoline and any other big oil maker knows what the Noack is because they will measure it in their lab.I’m not sure it’s published. I think it’s estimated based off others’ Noack.
I didn’t state it in the following thread, but at 2 hours, my Noack estimate for it and M1 5W-30 is around 8.7%. That was before the SDS stated GTL base oils, so it may be less now.Do we know what the VRP 5W30 NOACK is ?
Hopefully it’s less than 10% .
I am curious why NOACK, or evaporation loss, is an issue in this application. What am I missing?Stating the Noack as <15% doesn't mean much as it could be 8% and still be "<15%". The API requirement for Noack is <15%, so they are just listing that and saying it meets the "<15%" Noack requirement. If you call Valvoline they may give the actual Noack number.
No, not at all. I’m saying it’s totally normal. Look at the post I responded to and the chain of replies. Someone is arguing that it wasn’t Valvoline that came up with this cleaning agent but another lab. And I’m just saying that’s normal. How it works. Valvoline probably funded the lab or contracted them to do work for them.You say this like it is a bad thing for Valvoline. Or I am misunderstanding your point?
Who said it was an issue?I am curious why NOACK, or evaporation loss, is an issue in this application. What am I missing?
I tried to get more detailed information from Valvoline on their EP oils,they said only what was published, and also Mobil and they too were tight lipped on info. other more less common brands will give or more likely give out better detailed information on their products it seems.Stating the Noack as <15% doesn't mean much as it could be 8% and still be "<15%". The API requirement for Noack is <15%, so they are just listing that and saying it meets the "<15%" Noack requirement. If you call Valvoline they may give the actual Noack number.
Exactly. It isn't isn't that Valvoline developed the additive. They paid for it.It’s very easy to pay a lab and own the intellectual property of what they develop. This is very common in medical research. Drug companies fund research all the time in labs in universities. Anything they develop is owned by the drug company because they paid for the research.
It’s very easy to pay a lab and own the intellectual property of what they develop. This is very common in medical research. Drug companies fund research all the time in labs in universities. Anything they develop is owned by the drug company because they paid for the research.
Sounded like it was a lab that routinely does work for Valvoline, and most likely R&P uses proprietary ingredients. So doubt other oil companies can pay and get the same additives from the same developer. Valvoline has it locked down.Exactly. It isn't isn't that Valvoline developed the additive. They paid for it.
Right, but there seems to be an idea on the forum from some members that Valvoline themselves, in Lexington Kentucky, is creating the additive(s). They are not.Sounded like it was a lab that does work for Valvoline, and most likely R&P uses proprietary ingredients. So doubt other oil companies can pay and get the same additives from the same developer. Valvoline has it locked down.
Regardless of what lab worked with Valvoline to developed the additives, or where the development work was done, they are still proprietary additives only known by and used by Valvoline.Right, but there seems to be an idea on the forum from some members that Valvoline themselves, in Lexington Kentucky, is creating the additive(s). They are not.
Yeah, that's not the "argument".Regardless of what lab worked with Valvoline to developed the additives, or where the development work was done, they are still proprietary additives only known by and used by Valvoline.
Agreed ! I’m doing the opposite coming from my current fill of 0W30 ESP to 5W30 VRP (on deck next) .As for me, I plan on living vicariously through Glenda W.
Anxiously awaiting the results of G.W's test moving from VRP to ESP 0w-30.
If the results are as I expect, I will follow suit. Been on VRP for 3 OCI's. Likely switch to ESP. Waiting for the resulsfrom Glenda W.
I believe Valvoline was working with an Indian lab when the magic RP cleaning ingredient was discovered .Exactly. It isn't isn't that Valvoline developed the additive. They paid for it.
Update: Checked on these while grabbing some Gumout for the Toyota. No visible change. I’ll use this black one that’s been soaking during the next change with VRP to see what happens while in service.Here you go oil nerds! Due to request here is the Toyota OEM drain plug gasket soaked in VRP challenge. Ordered some more oil from WM online and put two new gaskets (black & blue type) in clean sample bottles with fresh oil. Bottles will be stored in non-climate controlled garage. Let’s see what happens.
View attachment 277634
View attachment 277635
View attachment 277636
View attachment 277637
View attachment 277638
I do wonder if being able to experience engine temperatures would make the results more conclusive.Update: Checked on these while grabbing some Gumout for the Toyota. No visible change. I’ll use this black one that’s been soaking during the next change with VRP to see what happens while in service.
View attachment 290717
View attachment 290718
It’s possible. There is a blue one on there right now. I’ll take pics of it when I do the next change here soon which will be at approx 3 months (May to Aug) and 5000 miles. I’ll install this soaked black one next so we can see what happens to it. It’s a typical hot summer here in the Texas so it’ll see some heat cycles.I do wonder if being able to experience engine temperatures would make the results more conclusive.
The blue one on the Tacoma came apart when I changed the oil this last time. The blue part that came off was in one piece at the bottom of my drain pan. This was the first run of VRP in the Tacoma, 3,000 miles and just shy of 5 months on that OCI. New on left, used on the right. These are supposed to be genuine OEM Toyota crush washers, but they came from Amazon so it’s possible that they are not. I’ve used about 5 of them so far and haven’t had any leaks, but I much prefer the old black fiber type crush washers that you used to be able to get.Update: Checked on these while grabbing some Gumout for the Toyota. No visible change. I’ll use this black one that’s been soaking during the next change with VRP to see what happens while in service.
View attachment 290717
View attachment 290718
I don’t think so. I think it’s more of a concern about leaving old gasket material behind and potentially causing a leak around the plug. No problem.@ATex7239 Is there speculation that this might be an issue with seals etc? I can't recall the original discussion. Thank you for doing this BTW, very interesting.