Valvoline Restore & Protect

I'm using R&P in my F250 with 35k miles (its a ten years old truck that takes short trips) and was shocked to observe a few things right out of the gate:
- It idles smoother in gear
- It seems to have more off-the line power
- It starts quieter. This is pronounced as I have a remote start that I use and usually hear it from within my house. I started it a few time while standing about 10ft away, and it is drastically quieter. No idea if that means anything, but its a nice side benefit.

I'm not trying to clean up the engine, as I don't think its very dirty, but prevent sludge from the short trips. Especially on days like today (-3 degrees F).
I need to agree the engine does sound better overall and i'm using 0W-20 which is what BMW now recommends for N20 engine in my climate during winter and summer. It used to be 5W-20. I need to try both with the recommend OCI to get a better report. Both my cars have turbo engines with a scoop --> airbox within the front grate of the car. The air temp of -13C/8.6F into my intake during my daily drive to work when usually at this time last year it is at least -20C/-4F. I am hitting 6-7K RPM in sport mode getting on the highway with then a highway drive each day 15KM there and back and the engine sound is very smooth and quiet. The N20 is prone to engine "clatter" which sounds almost like a diesel even when new. I posted a long video of my oil filter teardown so far and will update the thread when I get to about 4000KM. The only reason I changed my filter and did OCI @ 600KM was I was worried it would clog and block per Youtube, FB and BITOG threads. Here is an interesting video that relates:



My baseline for oil burning is 1 Quart per 1200KM/745 miles. Lets see if VRP it can fix it.
 
Last edited:
Just wanted to share some pictures. Went ahead and broke off the valve cover while I had time today. This is 3500 miles into my 4th oci with VRP. Absolutely no varnish from what I can see. The slight gold hue is from residual oil film.

IMG_1718.webp


IMG_1719.webp


IMG_1720.webp


IMG_1721.webp


IMG_1722.webp


IMG_1723.webp


IMG_1724.webp


IMG_1725.webp


IMG_1726.webp


IMG_1727.webp
 
Just wanted to share some pictures. Went ahead and broke off the valve cover while I had time today. This is 3500 miles into my 4th oci with VRP. Absolutely no varnish from what I can see. The slight gold hue is from residual oil film.

View attachment 260629

View attachment 260630

View attachment 260631

View attachment 260632

View attachment 260633

View attachment 260634

View attachment 260635

View attachment 260636

View attachment 260637

View attachment 260638
Very nice. What oci and oil have you been using before R&P?

This is what the old Tri Syn M1 formula use to look like at 300k.
 
As you said if the claims are true, which I see no reason they're not, then it's quite an impressive oil. I'm curious if this tech makes it into other oils.

I was trying to figure out what this additive might be. I looked into the patents filed by Aramco, the research they did at KAUST (a university in Saudi Arabia), then I looked at patents filed by Afton. I picked Aramco and Afton because I figured it wouldn't use an additive sold or controlled by Shell or Exxon, and I figured since VRP came out after the Aramco acquisition of Valvoline (2023), that Aramco might start using a patented process in its own oils vs letting someone else use it on a licensing basis.

Searching for terms like deposits, piston rings, cleaning, additives, oil consumption, IIIH test parameters -- I looked at the last 15 years of patents. There are hundreds, if not thousands. I don't have the technical background to parse this in detail or really much at all, so I can only offer the most low level summary of what I think might be possible candidates for this cleaning agent.

There were several patents specifically dealing with nanoparticle additives, physical abrasives in other words, and some patents regarding dispersants specifically to disperse carbon particles. The nanoparticle patents discussed uniquely shaped atomic arrangements to manufacture gentle abrasives for removing engine deposits that would remove engine deposits over time. Several patents looked at the friction reducing properties of them, but a few patents looked specifically at chemical additives that were specific to reducing deposits.

So it makes me wonder if the "gentle cleaning" and "up to 4 oil changes" thing discussed in the marketing isn't using something like a uniquely formed abrasive compound that doesn't increase friction and wear on relatively smooth metal surfaces, but in the right combinations of heat and pressure, when in contact with relatively rough surfaces (like carbon deposits) forms a scrubbing action. This, paired with some sort of dispersant specific for microscopic carbon particles, allows these sooty bits to remain in suspension. The nanoparticle size is extremely small, so it won't get caught by the filter, but if it can break off pieces of carbon and gunk, that will get captured by the filter if it cannot remain suspended in the oil. The fact that the VRP cleaner works best on piston ring deposits, and there was no mention or reports of much varnish removal, might hint at this being a novel abrasive that needs high temp / pressure. Areas of engine varnish people see under valve covers and cams are not high pressure, high temp areas like piston rings. And I am guessing the layer of varnish on engine parts is much smoother, at the microscopic level, than piston ring deposits. Hence why varnish removal doesn't happen as well as piston ring deposits.

All of this stuff, these additives, work in concert with the overall additive package of the oil. Because this isn't a Dexos approved oil, which would require submission of the full ingredient list, suggests there's some key synergy between the total additive package beyond just throwing some nanoparticles into the oil. Hence why I think Valvoline / Aramco hasn't requested Dexos certification. They don't want the secret to get out.
 
Last edited:
I was trying to figure out what this additive might be. I looked into the patents filed by Aramco, the research they did at KAUST (a university in Saudi Arabia), then I looked at patents filed by Afton. I picked Aramco and Afton because I figured it wouldn't use an additive sold or controlled by Shell or Exxon, and I figured since VRP came out after the Aramco acquisition of Valvoline (2023), that Aramco might start using a patented process in its own oils vs letting someone else use it on a licensing basis.

Searching for terms like deposits, piston rings, cleaning, additives, oil consumption, IIIH test parameters -- I looked at the last 15 years of patents. There are hundreds, if not thousands. I don't have the technical background to parse this in detail or really much at all, so I can only offer the most low level summary of what I think might be possible candidates for this cleaning agent.

There were several patents specifically dealing with nanoparticle additives, physical abrasives in other words, and some patents regarding dispersants specifically to disperse carbon particles. The nanoparticle patents discussed uniquely shaped atomic arrangements to manufacture gentle abrasives for removing engine deposits that would remove engine deposits over time. Several patents looked at the friction reducing properties of them, but a few patents looked specifically at chemical additives that were specific to reducing deposits.

So it makes me wonder if the "gentle cleaning" and "up to 4 oil changes" thing discussed in the marketing isn't using something like a uniquely formed abrasive compound that doesn't increase friction and wear on relatively smooth metal surfaces, but in the right combinations of heat and pressure, when in contact with relatively rough surfaces (like carbon deposits) forms a scrubbing action. This, paired with some sort of dispersant specific for microscopic carbon particles, allows these sooty bits to remain in suspension. The nanoparticle size is extremely small, so it won't get caught by the filter, but if it can break off pieces of carbon and gunk, that will get captured by the filter if it cannot remain suspended in the oil.

All of this stuff, these additives, work in concert with the overall additive package of the oil. Because this isn't a Dexos approved oil, which would require submission of the full ingredient list, suggests there's some key synergy between the total additive package beyond just throwing some nanoparticles into the oil. Hence why I think Valvoline / Aramco hasn't requested Dexos certification. They don't want the secret to get out.
Thanks for sharing, very interesting. (y)
 
Here are sideview pictures of lower part of cylinder 1 piston in a 2007 Subaru Forester EJ253 as viewed through the wrist pin access hole. Vehicle has 122,000 miles and is on its second interval of VRP. Vehicle was purchased used by current owners and was bought from elderly owners who only drove short trips. Oil consumption for current owners started out at 4 quarts per 5,000 miles. Current consumption 2 quarts in 5,000 miles. Will monitor for improvements after interval 3 and 4. Can see segment of oil ring and the carbon deposits within it. I also attached a piston from a different similar ej253 to help with the limited view from the wrist pin access hole. If/when I have this viewpoint again I will update thread with comparison photos.

I welcome anyone to do this to an EJ subaru through wrist pin access hole cylinder 1 for comparison pictures before and after VRP.

20250129_125643.webp


20250129_124702.webp


20250129_123556.webp
 
Here are sideview pictures of lower part of cylinder 1 piston in a 2007 Subaru Forester EJ253 as viewed through the wrist pin access hole. Vehicle has 122,000 miles and is on its second interval of VRP. Vehicle was purchased used by current owners and was bought from elderly owners who only drove short trips. Oil consumption for current owners started out at 4 quarts per 5,000 miles. Current consumption 2 quarts in 5,000 miles. Will monitor for improvements after interval 3 and 4. Can see segment of oil ring and the carbon deposits within it. I also attached a piston from a different similar ej253 to help with the limited view from the wrist pin access hole. If/when I have this viewpoint again I will update thread with comparison photos.

I welcome anyone to do this to an EJ subaru through wrist pin access hole cylinder 1 for comparison pictures before and after VRP.

Looking forward to those updates!
 
Back
Top Bottom