Originally Posted By: TooManyWheels
Originally Posted By: Johnny
My wife has a masters in secondary education and I have a two year associates degree in business. She taught for 37-years, I worked for Pennzoil/Shell for 21 years.
That is because people like the ones quoted above think all the worthwhile part of learning is done by the learner, and then only in math and science...
Was it Ben Franklin who said "Some people don't know what they don't know, and that is a whole new level of ignorance"?
No, Johnny's post reiterated my point (and the article's). His two-year associate's degree paid far more than the significantly more expensive secondary eduation degree. So going back to ROI, which had the better ROI, Johnny, who didnt actually even have a Bachelor's degree or his wife? Just proves the point that many full-up college degrees are NOT worth it in the big picture. There is a lot more to it than just having a slip of paper, and we are doing ourselves a disservice selling all sorts of degrees that dont get anyone anywhere.
Now that said, like was mentioned previously, one needs to follow their head and heart, and do what they enjoy. Johnny's wife may well do this and absolutely love and get a lot out of it... But it still does not mean that the ROI is very good.
Math and science are merely a prime example of a set of knowledge that one cannot really reasonably get without significant formal training. The average self-taught person is not going to derive all the basis tenets of calculus, physics, chemistry, etc. in their basement or back yard. But these things are the bedrock upon which any sort of other progress is made.