No owner’s manual or warranty book states that the new-car warranty is predicted on grade. The validity of the warranty is connected to damage. An oil of a somewhat higher HT/HS will not damage an engine, film thickness is what protects an engine from damage not the other way around. The use of thinner oils is only for meeting ever stricter CAFE requirements. There are no technical reasons why a thinner oil is required for engine operation. As long as the oil has a minimum HT/HS to prevent excessive wear then it is acceptable for use, but this in no way precludes the use of an oil that is thicker. The only advantage to a thinner oil is fuel economy, other than that there are no advantages only disadvantages.You have been repeating those three sentences for the last few years and it appears to be your interpretation of the situation. Can you show us any documentation indicating that the recommended grade does not need to be used?
How about you? Do you have any documentation that shows a certain thinner grade must be used? If there is then it would be political or procedural since there is no technical requirement. What I stated in my post is correct, the only requirement is that an automaker must strenuously promote the grade that is used to obtain their fuel economy results. This is the only “requirement”.