Toyota 0W20 Ford V10?

Pennzoil motor oil
Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Shannow
And the first two responses were provided in the most "simple" manner...complication and obfuscation.


Really? How was my answer "complication or obfucastion?".

Originally Posted By: Shannow
If an XW-20 is too complicated to use in a vehicle specifically designed to use another xW-20, and rigorously tested to use an xW-20, then what hope does the average Joe have but to use the exact same oil as used in the test...let alone anything else.


It was spec'd for a 5W20 oil; I was simply letting him know that 0W20 oil carries the same hths spec despite the "0W" part, because it does--and to alleviate some of the inevitable "that's to thin" (which of course has already started), because it's just as "thick" as what's spec'd for the vehicle.


Originally Posted By: Shannow

To the OP, I reckon that you are on a solid footing using that oil in your motorhome. If you choose any reasonably premium brand in the recommended viscosity range you'll be better than the average mug.



So, you're saying basically the same thing I am, but just want to complain...gotcha...

It's sad the guy comes on an oil site and is just met with a bunch of nonsense for just asking a question.
 
Thanks for the varied responses. The engine spec is for 5W20. The engine has an oil to water heat exchanger (oil cooler) mounted above the oil filter. Most of the mileage of the motorhome is run up by trips at least 50 miles. However it does see quite a few short trips-15 minute to half hour. It sees some hot summer temperatures. It gets about 6000 miles per year of use.

Thanks for all the responses.
 
Originally Posted By: Trav
Quote:
the tortured ecoboost was beat on hard, and motorcraft syn-blend had no issues protecting that boosted engine

One big problem with you observation is the ecobooost uses 5w30. not 20w.


The early ecoboost was originally spec'd 5w20 then was changed to 5w30. and the test was in the first year of the ecoboost which would have been a 5w20 spec'd engine and used Motorcraft 5w20 syn-blend for the torture test, because that was factory fill.
 
Originally Posted By: donnyj08
Originally Posted By: Trav
Quote:
the tortured ecoboost was beat on hard, and motorcraft syn-blend had no issues protecting that boosted engine

One big problem with you observation is the ecobooost uses 5w30. not 20w.


The early ecoboost was originally spec'd 5w20 then was changed to 5w30. and the test was in the first year of the ecoboost which would have been a 5w20 spec'd engine and used Motorcraft 5w20 syn-blend for the torture test, because that was factory fill.


Why the change to 5W30?
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: donnyj08
Originally Posted By: Trav
Quote:
the tortured ecoboost was beat on hard, and motorcraft syn-blend had no issues protecting that boosted engine

One big problem with you observation is the ecobooost uses 5w30. not 20w.


The early ecoboost was originally spec'd 5w20 then was changed to 5w30. and the test was in the first year of the ecoboost which would have been a 5w20 spec'd engine and used Motorcraft 5w20 syn-blend for the torture test, because that was factory fill.


Why the change to 5W30?


I suspect because of fuel dilution associated with short trips many "real world" driven ecoboost will see daily. my guess would be that the 5w30 more than likely shears to a 20wt very soon in that engine under short trip and stop and go applications, thus the switch to 5w30 for that engine.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: donnyj08




I suspect because of fuel dilution associated with short trips many "real world" driven ecoboost will see daily. my guess would be that the 5w30 more than likely shears to a 20wt very soon in that engine under short trip and stop and go applications, thus the switch to 5w30 for that engine.


The 20 grade most likely did some shearing too then. I like the way you quoted "real world", its a lot different than any kind of testing a mfg does. "Real world" testing takes years to accomplish, that's when the real issues, if any begin to pop up.
11.gif
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: donnyj08




I suspect because of fuel dilution associated with short trips many "real world" driven ecoboost will see daily. my guess would be that the 5w30 more than likely shears to a 20wt very soon in that engine under short trip and stop and go applications, thus the switch to 5w30 for that engine.


The 20 grade most likely did some shearing too then. I like the way you quoted "real world", its a lot different than any kind of testing a mfg does. "Real world" testing takes years to accomplish, that's when the real issues, if any begin to pop up.
11.gif



Well said sir, i agree 100%
 
I'd ask the OP the following questions:

1) What year is the motor home and chassis (F350, F450, etc).

2) What, for sure, is the factory spec'ed oil. The V10s
3) How many miles are on the engine?

My opinion is that this falls under the "as thick as necessary" clause. Motor homes work pretty hard and when they run, they usually run long distances so the warmup issue of a short hopper isn't a factor. Knowing most motor homes are run hard and are always carrying a load, the oil temp is likely to be higher than say an F350 that runs unloaded 90 percent of the time. For that reason, if it were mine, I'd have at least a shear resistant 5W30 (if not a 10W30) in it. I wouldn't argue to hard against a 5W40, especially if I could hook up a ScanGage and read oil temp and pressure. If OT was as high as I think it might be, a 40 grade would be fully justified.

All that said, I think this engine may well be able still still live a long and happy life on a good 20 grade (5W or 0W). But like some here like to say, there isn't much "headroom" left for those Arizona desert moments when you are flying to get thru the monotonous desertscape. Maybe with a full load of people, food, adult beverages and water tanks.
 
09 E450 with about 36K miles. I've always used Mobil 1 5W20.

As this motorhome is 24' and quite a bit under capacity for the chassis, I'm not inclined to go more viscous oil than the spec of 5W20. I'm also a very easy driver, roll at about 58 MPH and don't push the engine harder than necessary.

The answers in this thread only confirm my contradictory thoughts. I like a margin of safety, and the Mobil 1 is readily available. But I also have strong suspicion the Toyota oil would serve just fine.
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint

The 20 grade most likely did some shearing too then. I like the way you quoted "real world", its a lot different than any kind of testing a mfg does. "Real world" testing takes years to accomplish, that's when the real issues, if any begin to pop up.
11.gif



So real world testing only took place with ecoboost?

Ford completely failed to do any real world testing after 5w20 was introduced?

Yeah, they completely ignored the piles of engines you have constantly drawn our attention to
 
Originally Posted By: MarkStock
The OP doesn't know what he's let himself in for.

This could become the new thin vs thick oil thread.

He'll be shaking his head and telling all his friends "But I just asked a simple question ......."


This!
 
Originally Posted By: rvt

The answers in this thread only confirm my contradictory thoughts. I like a margin of safety, and the Mobil 1 is readily available. But I also have strong suspicion the Toyota oil would serve just fine.


This pretty much sums up my own thoughts as well. It'll work well, I just wouldn't go out of my way to source it since it's harder to find and more expensive. Of course, if you like just having 1 oil on-hand for 2 vehicles, then you can use it no problem.
 
Originally Posted By: MarkStock
Originally Posted By: demarpaint

The 20 grade most likely did some shearing too then. I like the way you quoted "real world", its a lot different than any kind of testing a mfg does. "Real world" testing takes years to accomplish, that's when the real issues, if any begin to pop up.
11.gif



So real world testing only took place with ecoboost?

Ford completely failed to do any real world testing after 5w20 was introduced?

Yeah, they completely ignored the piles of engines you have constantly drawn our attention to


Piles of engines? You're at it again Mark. Show me just one thread that I mentioned piles of engines? It doesn't exist, just like the test results you claimed were in that 2004 Ford article for the test I was thinking about the other day. You did some crafty side stepping on that one. We all know Ford claims to have tested the daylights out of the Eco-boost, so that's nothing new. Unfortunately the real world testing is done by the consumer it takes years to accomplish, no automaker has the time. That was my point, hopefully presented a bit more clearer for you? It seems you want to fight over that now.

Maybe Ford realized in this particular series of tests for their Eco-boost a 30 grade oil was better suited for the engine? What's the problem? Good for Ford, they're still tops in my book. Maybe in that application the 30 grade oil that is supposed to shear to a 20 grade oil is still a better choice. It still strikes me as odd if a 30 grade is going to shear to a 20 grade why not just stick with a 20 grade oil right from the beginning? Obviously there's a bit more to it.

Wish I had more time to play with you, I have dinner plans. Sorry! Besides the mods and the members need a break.
smile.gif
 
This is from the V6 engine program manager.
Could you please provide the link to where you read that.
This is from a Q&A with Jim Mazucho on that very test.
Quote:

2:23 Comment From Natasha
Saturday, 2:23 PM

What type of oil did you use and how often was it changed?

Natasha - Motorcraft 5W30 and oil change intervals every 10,000 miles
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint

Maybe Ford realized in this particular series of tests for their Eco-boost a 30 grade oil was better suited for the engine? What's the problem? Good for Ford, they're still tops in my book


So you're happy with 5w30 when Ford spec it but not 5w20 when Ford spec it

Hmmm wonder why

Now quit following me around on threads I post on to pick a fight

Your stalking is kind of creepy
 
Originally Posted By: MarkStock
Originally Posted By: demarpaint

Maybe Ford realized in this particular series of tests for their Eco-boost a 30 grade oil was better suited for the engine? What's the problem? Good for Ford, they're still tops in my book


So you're happy with 5w30 when Ford spec it but not 5w20 when Ford spec it

Hmmm wonder why


The point is the 20 grade oil isn't the Holy Grail you make it out to be, and that Ford made it out to be in your 2004 article. I have to go real slow with you I guess, and spell it all out. Yes I like Fords I've owned them for many, many years. I like my Jeep too in spite of what they spec for it. LOL Time for dinner!
 
Originally Posted By: JOD


This pretty much sums up my own thoughts as well. It'll work well, I just wouldn't go out of my way to source it since it's harder to find and more expensive. Of course, if you like just having 1 oil on-hand for 2 vehicles, then you can use it no problem.



I want to use the Toyota oil in my Toyota. I think it's perfectly appropriate for the kind of driving I do with it. The cost by the case is only a little more than the Mobil 1, and I pick up quite a bit at a time. It would be nice to have one oil to draw from. I already have an ATV and motorcycle which have their own unique oil requirements.

I also like to drive for fuel economy. I'm sure the oil is tiny influence, but with low cruising speed, keen eye on tire inflation etc. I do get relatively good fuel economy out of the E450 (10.1 MPG on last trip to southern Utah).
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Show me just one thread that I mentioned piles of engines? It doesn't exist

Unfortunately the real world testing is done by the consumer it takes years

Wish I had more time to play with you


So you complained about thin oil

Then you denied Fords testing took place

Then you said it was flawed

Then you say only real world testing over years counts

Now you say that after over a decade of real world testing on real fords there have not been any issues

And then you claim you've been playing with me all along and you wish to play more

Someone earlier said you had lost it. I agree

Let's end this for your sake (and quite frankly mine). Enjoy your dinner
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

T
Using 0w20 Instead of 5w20 For Winter?
Replies
8
Views
905
kschachn
O
2026 Prius PHEV Plan of action, point of interest, and thoughts.
Replies
15
Views
550
CANADADIY
B
Mazda 0w-20 with Moly - What's the recommendation in 2026?
2
Replies
26
Views
3K
altaylar
T
2007 Scion tC high oil consumption ~1qt/500mi
2 3 4
Replies
70
Views
2K
Japanese
A
High Oil Consumption with Motul 300V 5w40 ...
Replies
18
Views
2K
svenson
Back
Top Bottom