Thick is better

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hmm...

I have worked for a lot of shops and by far the most expert mechanic that I have ever worked for and one of the best I have ever met had something to say similar to the last post: appropriate viscosity is better.

He had certain reasons and logic behind this which I will do my humble best to layout in the few spare minutes I have before I catch my plane to New England.

The first thing I think he mentioned about it was that the manufacturer recommends a certain viscosity for a reason [whatever that reason may be].

As a shop owner he did his VERY best to stick by manufacturers recommendations for most things and was smart enough to USUALLY know when there was something better to do.

Another very important point he mentioned was liability. If you do your own oil changes you do not have to worry about this. He MADE me read the book from the oil supplier for EVERY car and use the recommended viscosity. In a small shop one needs to cover their legal bases the best one can and still do the best job on believes possible.

I believe the very most important thing that he said to me on this topic had to do with the size of oil passages. I may have missed this in this thread but I did not see it. When I was young[er] and dumb[er] I used 20w-50 in a ford 2.3L in the winter and I remember hearing the hyrdaulic valve lash adjusters clack for at least 30 seconds after startup. What does this mean? Well,if I have to tell you... At that same ambient temperature however I believe certain years of Audi almost insisted on 20w-50.

Steve that owns Automasters in Meriden, CT is the ONLY mechanic I recommend friends and family bring cars to. I no longer live in that part of the country so I cannot fix their cars. When I worked for him we had many many customers over 200K and 300K on their vehicles. I was asked once by another shop owner if I changed a lot of transmissions when I fixed Saabs [at Steve's largely Swedish vehicle shop] and I replied that I had changed very few. He was very surprised. This got me thinking. We had relatively few major failures compared to many shops in the area. Our preventative maintanence was good. We used the recommended fluids including special transmission fluids for Honda and Chrysler. We usually did what the manufacturer said and I think our customers did right by us.

We used the recommended viscosity. This is not always perfect, it depends on the manufacturer to do their homework. They have millions to figure this stuff out with while we have to all decide who and what we will believe. If liability is an issue I'd stick close to the recommendations. If you are a DIYer, do what you will.

The design of the oiling system and size of the oil passages makes proper, err, umm, appropriate viscosity selection important. If thicker is ALWAYS better then put some gear oil or grease in your sump.

That being said, I do agree with TallPaul that a thick film is desirable. I think thicker IS better IF the oiling system is designed for or can handle it. If you have an oil pre-charger and block heater installed MAYBE thicker is always better. It is accepted that the majority of engine wear occurs at cold startup, right?

On those vehicles which have different recommendations in different countries for the same engine, I wonder which one will last longer...

What I want is for my oil to circulate instantly and for it to protect very well under heavy loads or abuse. I want it all. Do I know how to get that? Well, no. I know how the best results I have ever seen have been obtained and I am humbly relaying that data here.
 
So, are you going to use oil recommended by the OEM outside of the US (typically thicker as there is no CAFE pressure), or in the US (thinner due to CAFE) ?
 
Oil recommendations with no CAFE pressure will be made primarily for engine protection, oil recommendations with CAFE pressure will be made primarily for marginal mileage improvements. Considering the decision criteria which recommendation will result in longer engine life ?
 
Dude, WTH is CAFE presssure?

I think I made it clear that I am a wrench turner. If you have data beyond my knowledge I will look at it but please, I'd like to be able to read it without arguing. I am only in search of data here and I hope you don't want to argue...

You want to know what I am going to use? I will probably use what the most intelligent analytical person in this entire forum suggests for my particular application...

It would not cover my *** IF I opened a shop to use recommendations for outside the US. Get the oil recommendations book from the manufacturer of the oil and AT LEAST your *** is covered in court. Smart and intelligent are USUALLY different from legally covered.

My boss covered his *** and almost always had very long engine life in customers vehicles by ONLY using manufacturer recommended oil and good quality NAPA silver filters and I insisted on writing a 3K interval on the OCI decal, even if he wanted me to round up I refused.

I still hope to learn something from you 1sttruck. I care nothing for mileage and all for engine life. PLEASE contribute what you can and I may adopt a new viewpoint but at this point I am firmly viewing from my current one. Never heard of CAFE nor do I suspect have most mechanics.

I appreciate your understanding of my post bulwnkl.
 
quote:

Originally posted by ne_plus_ultra_1:
Dude, WTH is CAFE presssure?

I think I made it clear that I am a wrench turner. If you have data beyond my knowledge I will look at it but please, I'd like to be able to read it without arguing. I am only in search of data here and I hope you don't want to argue...

You want to know what I am going to use? I will probably use what the most intelligent analytical person in this entire forum suggests for my particular application...

It would not cover my *** IF I opened a shop to use recommendations for outside the US. Get the oil recommendations book from the manufacturer of the oil and AT LEAST your *** is covered in court. Smart and intelligent are USUALLY different from legally covered.

My boss covered his *** and almost always had very long engine life in customers vehicles by ONLY using manufacturer recommended oil and good quality NAPA silver filters and I insisted on writing a 3K interval on the OCI decal, even if he wanted me to round up I refused.

I still hope to learn something from you 1sttruck. I care nothing for mileage and all for engine life. PLEASE contribute what you can and I may adopt a new viewpoint but at this point I am firmly viewing from my current one. Never heard of CAFE nor do I suspect have most mechanics.

I appreciate your understanding of my post bulwnkl.


CAFE - "Corporate Average Fuel Economy" mandated by the Energy Policy Conservation Act passed by the US Congress in 1975.

http://www.ita.doc.gov/td/auto/cafe.html
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/rules/cafe

Allegedly Ford has gone to 5W-20 oils in a mad attempt to stay under the CAFE limits.
 
quote:

Originally posted by 1sttruck:
Oil recommendations with no CAFE pressure will be made primarily for engine protection...

1sttruck, I respect and appreciate the contribution you make to this website.

There is no basis for your statement above to be made. Absence of one decision factor does not imply presence of an alternate, unrelated one. There are many (possible?) factors involved in the extremely-high-viscosity recommendations of other countries that are always ignored by those who have already decided xW20s are killing enigines. Furthermore, it cannot be shown at this point that base oil viscosity increases are related to engine wear decreases within the viscosity ranges recommended by manufacturers who operate both inside and outside of NA.
 
quote:

Originally posted by 1sttruck:
So, are you going to use oil recommended by the OEM outside of the US (typically thicker as there is no CAFE pressure), or in the US (thinner due to CAFE) ?

I think his answer to your question is given above in these sentences:

"It is accepted that the majority of engine wear occurs at cold startup, right?

On those vehicles which have different recommendations in different countries for the same engine, I wonder which one will last longer..."
 
quote:

"It is accepted that the majority of engine wear occurs at cold startup, right?

Most cold start wear comes from the cyls being wetted or washed from the fuel enrichment at cold start, be it a choke or FI mode. Lifters that tap until pumped up wear little to nothing out. Crank bearings are hit with a slug of oil as soon as the pump turns, regardless of vicosity (within reason). The whole thinner/startup/wear thing was more of a marketing tool to get people to more readily accept or buy the newer oils. The thin oils seem to be working out good, just don't expect less startup wear. just stuff I've read, I'm no expert.
 
"Allegedly Ford has gone to 5W-20 oils in a mad attempt to stay under the CAFE limits."

In the TSB recommending the use or 20 weight oils Ford specifically stated that it was being done for fuel economy reasons. In addition, I've previously provided other Ford TSBs specifically recommending that although vehicles may be shipped with 20 weight oil from the US, a 30 weight oil is recommended outside of the US.

It's not hard to figure out why Ford recommends 20 weight oils, as they tell you why. As Gary and others have commented there isn't going to be much difference between lighter and heavier oils to most owners of most passenger vehicles, especially the way that most are driven in the US, but this doesn't negate why Ford recommended using thinner oils.
 
Good answer 1911!
worshippy.gif
 
"It is accepted that the majority of engine wear occurs at cold startup, right?

Sorta ..but it's as wileyE states. It's a play on words mostly.

quote:

he whole thinner/startup/wear thing was more of a marketing tool to get people to more readily accept or buy the newer oils. The thin oils seem to be working out good, just don't expect less startup wear.

Thanks to the esteemed Dr. Haas, we've had bon fide testing that proves that elevated wear is occuring well into the first 20 minutes of operation. Only beyond that do we see "steady state" reduced wear. I don't agree with the good doctor's conclusions derived from it ..but I do thank him for the data. It takes 13-17 miles to fully warm up an engine. Now it's unlikely that the wear is linear (cylinder/ring wear) ..but it certainly doesn't all occur in 20 seconds or less.

That is, 95% of your typical wear is probably unavoidable. You can't even eliminate it with warmers and heaters. It's going to take xx# of btu's to thermally saturate your pistons and reduce the uneven forces applied to your ring/cylinder walls. Altering your viscoisty won't change this characteristic wear pattern. I can only (MAYBE) send it in a minor correction one way or the other.

This should allow us, with the fact that varous engines offer various recommendation of a wide span of viscosities for the same engine depending on where they are on the globe, to say that viscosity isn't a major issue one way or the other.

This should allows us to say that the lower viscosities, although adaquate, are closer to the "edge" and are at the MINIMUM acceptable visc to do the job.

..and subsequently this should allow us to assert

That aside from fuel economy, there's little need to use a lighter weight oil if one wants to afford maximum protection in regard to "fringe" assault ...as long as you also say that there is no reason to use a heavier weight oil if you can afford the same level of protection with a lesser weight.


Doesn't that about cover it??
dunno.gif
 
It's obvious most manufacturers recomend thicker viscosities everywhere else in the world ecxept the US; at least they allow a range of viscosities based on certain parameters (the way it should be). Can't be anything else BUT CAFE in the US. Or maybe Honda trying to sell more cars to enviro concious people.
 
Y_P_W, thanks for the links. Reading that information gives me a better understanding of CAFE and what CAFE compliance/noncompliance can mean. I've been lazy and haven't researched it very well.
 
quote:

“Who knows whose crystal ball is the best,” he says. “But I think automakers and buyers will continue to demand lower viscosity oil that still provides robust performance. We’re already actively involved with the next generation of Mobil 1 products. And we’re always pushing the bar higher.”

 
ne_plus_ultra_1, what shop is this? I gotta start going there! Even some VW specialty shops I know of use bulk 10W30 for everything, even old 70s and 80s stuff. You can hear the lifters rattle on the old hydraulic motors when they do that; if you RTFM it'll tell you that you basically ought to be running a xW40 minimum, but do they do it? NOOOOO!

nate
 
quote:

More on oil - here's an email from Mobil courtesy of Paul Therman;
[from the Technical Manager for Mobil Oil]
The Mitsubishi FTO is a high tech engine with the latest design and best materials in construction. When new, the engine is clean and tolerances are fine. Common sense suggests that to keep it like this and in tune for best performance you have to use a quality lubricant. The most stable products on the market and those which are being chosen by manufacturers for extended service are fully synthetic PAO (PolyAlphaOlefin). This includes Castrol SLX, Esso Ultron and Mobil 1. These products are extremely stable in extremes of performance. Next consideration is viscosity. At the low temperature end you need a 0W to give the best flow around the engine and ability to satisfy hydraulic tappets and variable valve timing. Note: 0W is not thin when cold. It is just thinner than higher numbered oils, in fact it is around 10 times thicker at 20 degrees than the oil is when at 100 degrees. For best high temperature performance you need an oil which has a High Temperatre High Shear (HTHS) rating of 3.5 minimum. This will usually mean a 40 weight oil. The high quality base oil and strong additive package make sure the oil does not shear and become lower than this figure. If it does, you have wear at best and siezure at worst. So there is the case for Mobil 1 0w-40. If it were my road car, and I drive enthusiastically! I would use Mobil 1 0W-40. However if you do not have low temperature situations, or care not about start up fuel economy, and run your FTO as an ultimate balls out rally car, then Mobil 1 Motorsport at 15W-50 may be the way to go to give you ultimate protection at the limit (thicker oil film at highest temperature and power). For your interest the product being promoted by Mitsubishi dealers (Castrol Magnatec) is offered to maximise profit potential from a relatively inferior cheap product. It is a mineral oil with a small percentage of non PAO synthetic to allow the not so low rating of 10w. Sure it will work and the engine will not sieze up. But consider the longer term !! Why do Castrol have a top tier SLX grade. And why are they launching a 0W-40 SLX onto the market. To copycat Mobil 1 0W-40 !!



 
quote:

Originally posted by buster:

quote:

More on oil - here's an email from Mobil courtesy of Paul Therman;
[from the Technical Manager for Mobil Oil]
-snip- However if you do not have low temperature situations, or care not about start up fuel economy, and run your FTO as an ultimate balls out rally car, then Mobil 1 Motorsport at 15W-50 may be the way to go to give you ultimate protection at the limit (thicker oil film at highest temperature and power). -snip-


An "ultimate 'what' out"??!!!
blush.gif


I think the Tech Manager may have, shall I say, "forgotten his environment". I was quite surprised to see this in an official response!

But we're all human...!
 
quote:

Originally posted by Crashbox:

I think the Tech Manager may have, shall I say, "forgotten his environment". I was quite surprised to see this in an official response!

But we're all human...!


Crashbox, get you mind out of the gutter
grin.gif


Balls out refers to the old governors on steam engines and early gas and oil engine that had flyball governors. At max speed the balls were straight out from the centripetal force.

Now you get to explain where "Balls to the wall" came from. Terry probably knows.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom