*This is NOT a thin/thick debate*
If we do assume that the reason for thinner and thinner oil formulations is to reduce emissions and improve fuel economy even fractionally, then if those reasons didn't exist or were not important to consumers and/or mandated by the government, is there a compelling case for an engine to spec 0W-8/16/20 over say a 0/5W-30/40 for reasons OTHER than fuel economy/emissions? Can a 0W-20 better protect an engine better than a 30wt if most other variables like base oil composition and additive package are the same/similar? Or is the hard and fast rule that a weightier oil will do better at protecting but you do lose fuel economy and propagate more emissions?
If we do assume that the reason for thinner and thinner oil formulations is to reduce emissions and improve fuel economy even fractionally, then if those reasons didn't exist or were not important to consumers and/or mandated by the government, is there a compelling case for an engine to spec 0W-8/16/20 over say a 0/5W-30/40 for reasons OTHER than fuel economy/emissions? Can a 0W-20 better protect an engine better than a 30wt if most other variables like base oil composition and additive package are the same/similar? Or is the hard and fast rule that a weightier oil will do better at protecting but you do lose fuel economy and propagate more emissions?