Delvac has moly.quote:
Originally posted by JohnBrowning:
Look at Delo 400 and Delvac 1300 both work fine with out Moly. I like moly and have used it alot in bearings but think we make too much of it!
quote:
Originally posted by Patman:
You do realize that you've just described most of the oils on the market though. Only a small percentage of oils out there use more than 150ppm of moly in their formulation.quote:
Originally posted by buster:
All I know is that the oils that have the least amount of Moly (strong>
Hehehe, thanks! But it turns out Schaeffer's Moly isn't too rich in Moly. I was told it would increase the Moly by 15 to 20 PPM. Schaeffer's Moly still remains one the very very few oil additives that BITOG-ers approve of / recommend and it's already added to RedLine in a super-cleaned jug, ready to go after I add LC.quote:
Originally posted by Grossomotto:
You should change your name to
"rob-the-Moly-nut
Probably what Mobil Delvac 1 and Amsoil are using. Amsoil's racing oils use ZERO Moly and M1R only uses about 70ppm.quote:
I have read that there are organics that are superior to moly as a FM and cost more,
Also, this link makes an interesting point. Can someone differentiate this Moly from what RL is using? Molybdenumquote:
I e-mailed one of my main Lubrizol contacts and he made the following observations:
Q: In your opinion, are these additives (I specifically mentioned Molyvan 855 by RT Vanderbilt) significant in terms of engine oil performance, or are they just a lot of hype?
A: Organic molybdenum compounds definitely have been shown to enhance performance of engine oils. They not only act as friction modifiers (improving fuel efficiency), but also may behave as oxidation inhibitors.
Using organic molybdenum compounds in engine oils offers some formulating challenges. First of all, they are costly. More important, they may pose some unique performance challenges; i.e., corrosion problems, particularly for yellow metal engine components. Thus, the lubricant formulation must be tailored around the molybdenum component to insure that all performance features are properly addressed. If one just plops a molybdenum component into an existing motor oil formulation, without rechecking performance, field service problems could crop up. This has happened many times in the past when oil marketers supplemented their existing motor oil products to add extra claims; i.e., fuel economy.
I'm a Moly Kook too. Yes, I admit it. It has been hard... very hard, yes so very hard not to use the 20 or so galllons of 10w30 Moly enriched oil I have around here.... BUT I have... I have stuck to a plain Jane Bottom of the line oil that is a "no-Named oil" I am using it and running her HARD and HEAVY every chance I get during break-IN... about 1/2 way to th4e end of the 36K warranty.... then I'll think about going back to MOLY!quote:
Originally posted by rob-the-oil-nut:
I am a Moly lover and a RedLine lover, and was thinking of adding Schaeffer's Moly to RedLine. Moly overkill? Absolutely. -*-*-*
can anyone give me a solid reason not to try it?
(-*-*-*
I wonder how many different Moly's their are?quote:
Look at the notes under the various R.T. Vanderbilt Moly's concerning copper corrosion