Teslas have highest accident rates per 1000 drivers highest of any auto brand.

This Forbes article is actually referencing one lenders data - lending tree.

Their findings are interesting.

The cliff notes if you dont want to read. Copied directly from the article.

  • Across 30 car brands analyzed, Ram has the worst drivers. Nationally, Ram drivers had 32.90 driving incidents (accidents, DUIs, speeding and citations) per 1,000 drivers from Nov. 14, 2022, through Nov. 14, 2023. Tesla (31.13) and Subaru (30.09) were the only other brands whose drivers had incident rates above 30.00.
  • Mercury has the best drivers in the year analyzed. Mercury drivers had 15.82 incidents per 1,000 drivers nationally — less than half the rate of incidents among Ram drivers. Pontiac (16.24) and Saturn (16.84) followed.
  • Looking closer, Ram has the worst drivers in 23 states. That means Ram drivers had the highest incident rates of any brand analyzed in nearly half of all U.S. states. Of the states where Ram dominated, drivers were worst in Massachusetts at 64.44 incidents per 1,000 drivers. Meanwhile, Tesla drivers were the worst in 11 states — the only other brand in the double digits.
  • Tesla drivers have the highest accident rate. From Nov. 14, 2022, through Nov. 14, 2023, Tesla drivers had 23.54 accidents per 1,000 drivers. Ram (22.76) and Subaru (20.90) were the only other brands with more than 20.00 accidents per 1,000 drivers. Meanwhile, Pontiac (8.41), Mercury (8.96) and Saturn (9.13) were the only brands with fewer than 10.00 accidents per 1,000 drivers.
  • BMW drivers have the highest DUI rate by a wide margin. BMW drivers had 3.13 DUIs per 1,000 drivers — nearly twice the rate of DUIs among Ram drivers (1.72), the next-highest ranking auto brand. On the other end, Mitsubishi (0.89), Volvo (0.92), and Mercury and Kia drivers (both 0.93) had the lowest DUI rates. Just nine of the 30 brands analyzed had DUI rates below 1.00 among their drivers.
Pontiac? Saturn?
I know GTOs were king of the street back in the day, but what about What about my Oldsey?
I'm feeling a little shortchanged here...

From a statistics standpoint, how many Pontiacs are even on the road today? And of those, how many see 10K per year? I don't know of a single Pontiac, or even Saturn, that is in daily use today.

These numbers appear to be bogus.
 
Vehicle accident rates are always and everywhere the fault of the drivers involved and never the car. It is up to the driver to understand any car's quirks and to drive with them in mind. For many of us this is second nature but there are also those who never learn.
With a BMW, you at least are sure to get brakes and handling to match the car's acceleration, but this is not true of all really quick cars.
 
It is likely reasonable to assume most TSLA owners have higher ACT/SAT scores, can rock statisics exams, and have a higher percentage of STEM degrees, when compared to non TSLA owners.

At the same time, many TSLA owners likely couldn't walk through the woods 500 meters at 30 degrees, with a functional compass and end up within 100 meters of where they should end up. The very intelligent TSLA owners probably have challenges critically thinking in crisis/conflict situations.

Being super smart does not necessarily translate to life skills of a defensive driver.
 
Last edited:
One of those uppity Pontiac drivers...
1703116691009.webp
 
Think he had the ability to change the oil and filter?
Well, Spock could mind meld with whales, so there's that...

  • "Insufficient facts always invite danger."
  • "Without followers, evil cannot spread."
  • “May I say that I have not thoroughly enjoyed serving with Humans? I find their illogic and foolish emotions a constant irritant.”
  • "If I Were Human, I Believe My Response Would Be 'Go To Heck'... If I Were Human."
 
Last edited:
Well, Spock could mind meld with whales, so there's that...

  • "Insufficient facts always invite danger."
  • "Without followers, evil cannot spread."
  • “May I say that I have not thoroughly enjoyed serving with Humans? I find their illogic and foolish emotions a constant irritant.”
  • "If I Were Human, I Believe My Response Would Be 'Go To Heck'... If I Were Human."
Your post "so there's that" reminded me of this line from the movie Caddyshack.

What did the Dalai Lama say to Carl Spackler?

But, in the story recounted by Spackler, the Dalai Lama leaves without giving him a tip. Spackler: "And I say, 'Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know. ' And he says, 'Oh, uh, there won't be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness.
 
The safer your car the more reckless you can be. 🤡
There is some truth in that statement. I'm told that when ABS was introduced there was no reduction in the number of accidents. It should have resulted in a significant drop in accidents as cars could stop faster in poor conditions and you could now steer under heavy braking. But no, people tail-gated more and drove faster in poor conditions.
 
I think the problem with a lot of Teslas is they are a (relatively) cheap but VERY fast car. It's easy for someone to get themselves into a vehicle that far exceeds their driving skill.
I don't think so. I rarely see Teslas doing anything but going near the speed limit. I think Tesla drivers are distracted / not engaged / reliant on ADAS.
 
I've felt for years that Tesla and BMW could merge and both companies could win for it. Tesla knows electric powertrains while BMW can do the chassis tuning and has general engineering and manufacturing "tribal knowledge" that's worth more than Elon thinks. The way things are going, though, TSLA would absorb BMW like AOL absorbed Time Warner 20 years ago.

Tesla subsidizes insurance for its owners, and will for as long as it sells cars... then expect that switch to be rudely flipped.
 
I don't think so. I rarely see Teslas doing anything but going near the speed limit. I think Tesla drivers are distracted / not engaged / reliant on ADAS.
I not sure on a macro level TSLA drivers are distracted. I speculate they are not fluent as a group on situational awareness.
 
I've felt for years that Tesla and BMW could merge and both companies could win for it. Tesla knows electric powertrains while BMW can do the chassis tuning and has general engineering and manufacturing "tribal knowledge" that's worth more than Elon thinks. The way things are going, though, TSLA would absorb BMW like AOL absorbed Time Warner 20 years ago.

Tesla subsidizes insurance for its owners, and will for as long as it sells cars... then expect that switch to be rudely flipped.
I don't think so. Tesla's goal is making cars that drive themselves and appeal to the broadest audience. You can argue about their recent success or commitment, but BMW is still ostensibly making drivers' cars and luxury cars. Tesla wants to be Silicon Valley Toyota, not BMW. Obviously BMW has and will have to pivot as everyone targets self-driving abilities. Even though there is overlap in some of their current customer base, Tesla probably believes the things BMW is good at are useless anachronisms.
 
There is some truth in that statement. I'm told that when ABS was introduced there was no reduction in the number of accidents. It should have resulted in a significant drop in accidents as cars could stop faster in poor conditions and you could now steer under heavy braking. But no, people tail-gated more and drove faster in poor conditions.
Nanny systems are merely an aid but they are not meant to replace common sense and good habits but they are often used negligently. For example, there's nothing wrong with blind spot monitoring but using it instead of checking your mirrors and maybe looking over your shoulder is simply dumb. Reliance on technology brings its own risks. A tool is only ad good as the person using it.

When I was a kid we didn't wear helmets when biking and skating. I had a buddy whose mom made him wear a helmet, pads, the works. He was the one who always got hurt because he got too cocky and because we encouraged him. Of course, maybe he would have been just as reckless without the safety gear.
 
Nanny systems are merely an aid but they are not meant to replace common sense and good habits but they are often used negligently. For example, there's nothing wrong with blind spot monitoring but using it instead of checking your mirrors and maybe looking over your shoulder is simply dumb. Reliance on technology brings its own risks. A tool is only ad good as the person using it.

When I was a kid we didn't wear helmets when biking and skating. I had a buddy whose mom made him wear a helmet, pads, the works. He was the one who always got hurt because he got too cocky and because we encouraged him. Of course, maybe he would have been just as reckless without the safety gear.
Agreed. You can't fix stupid. So we band aid it. This is the crux of the Tesla 2M vehicle "recall". The recall is to improve the Nag, nothing more.
 
Nanny systems are merely an aid but they are not meant to replace common sense and good habits but they are often used negligently. For example, there's nothing wrong with blind spot monitoring but using it instead of checking your mirrors and maybe looking over your shoulder is simply dumb. Reliance on technology brings its own risks. A tool is only ad good as the person using it.

When I was a kid we didn't wear helmets when biking and skating. I had a buddy whose mom made him wear a helmet, pads, the works. He was the one who always got hurt because he got too cocky and because we encouraged him. Of course, maybe he would have been just as reckless without the safety gear.
Sounds like his Mom was right. Maybe he would have ended up dead instead of hurt.
 
Sounds like his Mom was right. Maybe he would have ended up dead instead of hurt.
Or he might not have felt like he was Iron Man and he might have been more careful. I should find out what became of him.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom