- Joined
- Oct 15, 2022
- Messages
- 319
True story. Seriously.The safer your car the more reckless you can be.![]()
True story. Seriously.The safer your car the more reckless you can be.![]()
All the turn signals in CA are broken.I have seen this happen in multiple regions across the states, but at least they use their turn signals regardless of brand...should count for something right?
That depends on what you think of the car company...Is it a problem with the car or the driver?
Pontiac? Saturn?This Forbes article is actually referencing one lenders data - lending tree.
Their findings are interesting.
The cliff notes if you dont want to read. Copied directly from the article.
- Across 30 car brands analyzed, Ram has the worst drivers. Nationally, Ram drivers had 32.90 driving incidents (accidents, DUIs, speeding and citations) per 1,000 drivers from Nov. 14, 2022, through Nov. 14, 2023. Tesla (31.13) and Subaru (30.09) were the only other brands whose drivers had incident rates above 30.00.
- Mercury has the best drivers in the year analyzed. Mercury drivers had 15.82 incidents per 1,000 drivers nationally — less than half the rate of incidents among Ram drivers. Pontiac (16.24) and Saturn (16.84) followed.
- Looking closer, Ram has the worst drivers in 23 states. That means Ram drivers had the highest incident rates of any brand analyzed in nearly half of all U.S. states. Of the states where Ram dominated, drivers were worst in Massachusetts at 64.44 incidents per 1,000 drivers. Meanwhile, Tesla drivers were the worst in 11 states — the only other brand in the double digits.
- Tesla drivers have the highest accident rate. From Nov. 14, 2022, through Nov. 14, 2023, Tesla drivers had 23.54 accidents per 1,000 drivers. Ram (22.76) and Subaru (20.90) were the only other brands with more than 20.00 accidents per 1,000 drivers. Meanwhile, Pontiac (8.41), Mercury (8.96) and Saturn (9.13) were the only brands with fewer than 10.00 accidents per 1,000 drivers.
- BMW drivers have the highest DUI rate by a wide margin. BMW drivers had 3.13 DUIs per 1,000 drivers — nearly twice the rate of DUIs among Ram drivers (1.72), the next-highest ranking auto brand. On the other end, Mitsubishi (0.89), Volvo (0.92), and Mercury and Kia drivers (both 0.93) had the lowest DUI rates. Just nine of the 30 brands analyzed had DUI rates below 1.00 among their drivers.
Think he had the ability to change the oil and filter?One of those uppity Pontiac drivers...
View attachment 194003
Well, Spock could mind meld with whales, so there's that...Think he had the ability to change the oil and filter?
Your post "so there's that" reminded me of this line from the movie Caddyshack.Well, Spock could mind meld with whales, so there's that...
- "Insufficient facts always invite danger."
- "Without followers, evil cannot spread."
- “May I say that I have not thoroughly enjoyed serving with Humans? I find their illogic and foolish emotions a constant irritant.”
- "If I Were Human, I Believe My Response Would Be 'Go To Heck'... If I Were Human."
There is some truth in that statement. I'm told that when ABS was introduced there was no reduction in the number of accidents. It should have resulted in a significant drop in accidents as cars could stop faster in poor conditions and you could now steer under heavy braking. But no, people tail-gated more and drove faster in poor conditions.The safer your car the more reckless you can be.![]()
RAM drivers seem to shine here in the winter months during snow. They seem to think that 4WD means you can go for it in snow. That's the only time of the year BMW takes the back seat. That's probably because Daddy doesn't want his PITA kid wrecking the car, so it sits in the garage.![]()
I don't think so. I rarely see Teslas doing anything but going near the speed limit. I think Tesla drivers are distracted / not engaged / reliant on ADAS.I think the problem with a lot of Teslas is they are a (relatively) cheap but VERY fast car. It's easy for someone to get themselves into a vehicle that far exceeds their driving skill.
I not sure on a macro level TSLA drivers are distracted. I speculate they are not fluent as a group on situational awareness.I don't think so. I rarely see Teslas doing anything but going near the speed limit. I think Tesla drivers are distracted / not engaged / reliant on ADAS.
I don't think so. Tesla's goal is making cars that drive themselves and appeal to the broadest audience. You can argue about their recent success or commitment, but BMW is still ostensibly making drivers' cars and luxury cars. Tesla wants to be Silicon Valley Toyota, not BMW. Obviously BMW has and will have to pivot as everyone targets self-driving abilities. Even though there is overlap in some of their current customer base, Tesla probably believes the things BMW is good at are useless anachronisms.I've felt for years that Tesla and BMW could merge and both companies could win for it. Tesla knows electric powertrains while BMW can do the chassis tuning and has general engineering and manufacturing "tribal knowledge" that's worth more than Elon thinks. The way things are going, though, TSLA would absorb BMW like AOL absorbed Time Warner 20 years ago.
Tesla subsidizes insurance for its owners, and will for as long as it sells cars... then expect that switch to be rudely flipped.
Nanny systems are merely an aid but they are not meant to replace common sense and good habits but they are often used negligently. For example, there's nothing wrong with blind spot monitoring but using it instead of checking your mirrors and maybe looking over your shoulder is simply dumb. Reliance on technology brings its own risks. A tool is only ad good as the person using it.There is some truth in that statement. I'm told that when ABS was introduced there was no reduction in the number of accidents. It should have resulted in a significant drop in accidents as cars could stop faster in poor conditions and you could now steer under heavy braking. But no, people tail-gated more and drove faster in poor conditions.
Agreed. You can't fix stupid. So we band aid it. This is the crux of the Tesla 2M vehicle "recall". The recall is to improve the Nag, nothing more.Nanny systems are merely an aid but they are not meant to replace common sense and good habits but they are often used negligently. For example, there's nothing wrong with blind spot monitoring but using it instead of checking your mirrors and maybe looking over your shoulder is simply dumb. Reliance on technology brings its own risks. A tool is only ad good as the person using it.
When I was a kid we didn't wear helmets when biking and skating. I had a buddy whose mom made him wear a helmet, pads, the works. He was the one who always got hurt because he got too cocky and because we encouraged him. Of course, maybe he would have been just as reckless without the safety gear.
Sounds like his Mom was right. Maybe he would have ended up dead instead of hurt.Nanny systems are merely an aid but they are not meant to replace common sense and good habits but they are often used negligently. For example, there's nothing wrong with blind spot monitoring but using it instead of checking your mirrors and maybe looking over your shoulder is simply dumb. Reliance on technology brings its own risks. A tool is only ad good as the person using it.
When I was a kid we didn't wear helmets when biking and skating. I had a buddy whose mom made him wear a helmet, pads, the works. He was the one who always got hurt because he got too cocky and because we encouraged him. Of course, maybe he would have been just as reckless without the safety gear.
Or he might not have felt like he was Iron Man and he might have been more careful. I should find out what became of him.Sounds like his Mom was right. Maybe he would have ended up dead instead of hurt.