Corolla or Mazda3. Both very reliable and get great MPG's. With the Mazda3 you get a lot of extras that you'd think would be on a more expensive car.....so a good value in my opinion.
Thank you. OP admittedly has been out of the new car market for ten years. Meanwhile posters on here on posting MSRP's of vehicles that may or may not exist-and then you have dealer add ons once you arrive at the dealership.It is physically impossible to get an actually good vehicle under 25k from a dealership. I have been looking at cars and shopping for a few months now, add 10K to what ever price you see online, MINIMUM. If you can't pay a 10k premium, don't even look.
Showed up to a dealership for a 35k car, the mark up was to 45. Showed up for a 45k car, mark up is 55k. Watching new corollas get marked to 30k is a joke. Can't wait for the car crash, housing crash, the whole 9 yards. Hope they all hurt too, they deserve it.
Went to pick up a car that was clean title, single owner, 28k miles, v6, 3 years old. MSRP was 38. They wanted 28. After all the "optional" cough not optional cough 2500 in add on's, and 2000$ in fees, put the car at a whopping 32.5k. Argued about the addons, saying thats illegal to add if it says optional, they obliged and took it off. Fine, I was okay with the price, drove 2 hours to look at it. Found a crappy cover up job of a wrecked rear end, bondo everywhere, messy trunk, could tell they just fixed it. Got underneat the car, tags were hanging off the aftermarket exhaust. Sure, "one owner no accidents clean title". What a waste. they dropped the price like 1000$ I said the issue isn't the price anymore but your shady practices.
The days of walking in and haggling are over. I don't waste my time unless I have an invoice from the manager in my inbox before driving down with a price I agreed on. Its literally not worth anyone's time.Thank you. OP admittedly has been out of the new car market for ten years. Meanwhile posters on here on posting MSRP's of vehicles that may or may not exist-and then you have dealer add ons once you arrive at the dealership.
We'll find out, I guess the oned built in China would have some fatter profit margins for putting good quality components into it, but most are from Korea and production costs there would be pretty close to here I would think. So we've got a high stress engine in a budget vehicle.1.2L turbo in a 4200lb car?
This will be laughably unreliable, even for an American car.
Corolla or Mazda3. Both very reliable and get great MPG's. With the Mazda3 you get a lot of extras that you'd think would be on a more expensive car.....so a good value in my opinion.
For real! It seems none of them want to "keep it simple, stupid" anymore. Notice my signature. I have three relatively new vehicles, all NA, and I hope to not buy another vehicle for a long, long, looooong time just because of this.A simple low tech 2.0L NA motor would probably perform almost exactly the same, but at a couple hundred rpm higher, and have much less to go wrong.
maverick ?Sheesh I'm old. One of my all time fav's was a 4-cyl stick-shift little truck.
The problem is that any kind of truck is out of my budget - and then there's the fuel economy thing.
Maybe in some markets, but not everywhere. Forum members love to post on here when they bought something below MSRP; who was it the other day saying he got a Civic below MSRP? Americans love their big trucks and SUVs and the dealers mark them up sky high but at the end of the model year the base model sedans are blown out below MSRP just to be rid of them.It is physically impossible to get an actually good vehicle under 25k from a dealership. I have been looking at cars and shopping for a few months now, add 10K to what ever price you see online, MINIMUM. If you can't pay a 10k premium, don't even look.
Showed up to a dealership for a 35k car, the mark up was to 45. Showed up for a 45k car, mark up is 55k. Watching new corollas get marked to 30k is a joke. Can't wait for the car crash, housing crash, the whole 9 yards. Hope they all hurt too, they deserve it.
I used to feel the same, but turbo reliability is good as opposed to decades ago and you really can't beat the economy and power...it's like having your cake and eating it too. I get over 300 ft./lbs of torque while scoring almost 40 mpg. NA powerplants can't touch that.For real! It seems none of them want to "keep it simple, stupid" anymore. Notice my signature. I have three relatively new vehicles, all NA, and I hope to not buy another vehicle for a long, long, looooong time just because of this.
That is a choice you will have to make and you will have to live with...I need a new car. Something reliable with decent insurance rates and less than 30K. Preferably under 25K.
No SUVs. Or trucks, Or crossovers. Just a car. Basic transportation - doesn't need to be fancy.
Retired owner. Mostly rural area. 15 miles to town. Occasional interstate and long trips. Probably 15k annual mileage.
Whatcha got ?
Toyota's M20A has a 41% thermal efficiency, the highest in a consumer grade engine, you would have to look at formula 1 to get higher. It gets great fuel economy and better power than that 1.2L turbo and does better than just about every single other 2 liter NA motor and about on par with older 2.5 and 2.4 NA motors juts from 5-10 years ago. Not only that, but the M20A is super reliable, and easy to maintain, parts are cheap, and you literally can't go wrong with it. The A25A is about the only other NA 4 cylinder with a linear performance and mileage improvement. My 2.5 camry with the A25A averages over the course of almost 300k miles a whopping 38 MPG....Non hybrid.We'll find out, I guess the oned built in China would have some fatter profit margins for putting good quality components into it, but most are from Korea and production costs there would be pretty close to here I would think. So we've got a high stress engine in a budget vehicle.
I think that engine better have some good engineering, parts quality selection, manufacturing, and QC, to live long and prosper in that application. We will find out if GM did that or cut some corners.
What I don't get, is that the end product doesn't really get good mileage anyways? A simple low tech 2.0L NA motor would probably perform almost exactly the same, but at a couple hundred rpm higher, and have much less to go wrong.