Audi Junkie - on some cars I agree. Changing the filter is 99% of the job hassle, so just change the oil. On the other hand on other cars, it's quite simple to drop the filter. To each his own. A crock? Whatever.
When that can was in use, Amsoil had plenty of di-basic esters in it - they have long since been replaced by PAO's.quote:
Originally posted by Mike:
Its funny that so many have negative things to say about a product they don't or won't use. I suppose the millions of Amsoil users dating back to 1973 are just crazy. The very first can of Amsoil I ever had said "25,000 miles or 1 Year". I did that and never had any engine related problems in any vehicle. Yet people who don't have the experience in exteneded drains offer opinions based on what they read or interperate. 25,000 miles or 1 yr OCI are nothing new. Here is a image of the first oil cans from 1973. While the people in this arguement have changed, the rhetoric has not.
The two BITOG site sponsors for Amsoil spoke about the 229.4 spec being a page number in some book herequote:
Originally posted by FowVay:
I'm still trying to figure out how Amsoil meets/exceeds MB 229.4. It truly must be some good stuff because nobody else on the planet can meet this standard. Of course,, there is surely no way to prove that it doesn't meet this standard either.
Right and they followed Mobil's approach which has always been PAO. Now the question I have is why? Cost is my guess although if Amsoil formulates an oil like S2k that is $8.35qt, they could have easily used a POE basestock instead or more of it I should say. But they didn't. Amsoil claims they don't agree with Redline's chemistry.....quote:
When that can was in use, Amsoil had plenty of di-basic esters in it - they have long since been replaced by PAO's
quote:
It's kind of like some big cult waiting for the spaceship to come pick them up (while sitting in their cars loaded with cases of Amsoil of course). The whole vitamin and fertilizer thing freaks me out a little too. Kind of like "We can all have a better way of life. OMMMMMMmmmm. We can get it online only from AL. OMMMMMmmmmm. He is our leader. OMMMMMmmmmm." ...
A few years ago I caught Amsoil claiming to meet a mil spec with an a oil that couldn't have possibly met the spec because it was the wrong viscosity. That made me wonder if they even bother to read the specs they claim to meet.quote:
Originally posted by Motorbike:
The two BITOG site sponsors for Amsoil spoke about the 229.4 spec being a page number in some book here
MB 229.4
Amsoil meets API requirements. Not sure why you missed that. All formulations licensed? No, just like Redline. Amsoil does NOT want the formula under API control because their money making scheme stinks.quote:
I would rather use a motor oil that meets API requirements
Uhh...dude....uh....please tell us more. Which organizations "approve" these oils? It really doesn't work this way. Again sorry to disappoint.quote:
It costs Amsoil far less to just claim it meets various specs than it does to get approved by the organizations that control the specs.