- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 39,793
It did come in handy.
jcwit said:You may argue, now prove it. Then prove that bovine hormones are harmful to the masses. Don't need your opinion, state facts and studies.
My only argument is that likely the hormones of any type being passed along in the milk would be in the fat. Never said that bovine hormones are bad for people, so there is nothing for me to prove on that. As for the hormones being carried in the fat:
No, but you sure as heck implied it.
TallPaul said:jcwit said:You may argue, now prove it. Then prove that bovine hormones are harmful to the masses. Don't need your opinion, state facts and studies.
My only argument is that likely the hormones of any type being passed along in the milk would be in the fat. Never said that bovine hormones are bad for people, so there is nothing for me to prove on that. As for the hormones being carried in the fat:
Quote:
No, but you sure as heck implied it.
I did use the word "maybe" but I guess it would have been clearer if I had also used a "?" at the end of the sentence. I seems that it was implied in the post I was responding to. But the article I linked does point a finger at the bovine hormones when delivered in very high concentrations.