Rode The New 2018 Softail Fat Bob 114 c.i. Today

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Silverado12
Well, I rode a friend's modified Hayabusa yesterday. That thing will scare you it's so fast. In a different league, though. Dang bike will do 135 in third gear.


With stock gearing, stock rev-limiter, and stock diameter rear tire, both first and second gen Hayabusa's will exceed 130 mph in 3rd gear. It would actually be 135-137 mph at the rev-limiter in 3rd gear, depending on which generation. The stock gearing is slightly taller on the first gen bike.
 
Originally Posted By: endeavor to persevere
Why would grampi or any one else for that matter care what may or may not be wrong with a bike they will never own. It does not effect them. I do not set around and worry about what I may not like about a bike I will never own. I will never go on one of their forums to tell them I think their bikes suck. I guess its easier to do when hiding behind a key board. They wouldn't fair too well face to face. I guess these people are just busy bodies and have nothing better to do.


It's called talking about bikes...it's not a new concept...
 
Originally Posted By: SlipperyPete
Originally Posted By: DuckRyder
It would be really nice if we could just talk reasonably about motorcycles.

This board has proved itself incapable of that time and time again, particularly if the MoCo is involved.

When someone basically says “it sucks, but I have never ridden it and don’t intend to” then they’ve shown what they are. There is no point is continuing a discussion with that person.


Talk reasonably? You mean like this?

Originally Posted By: DuckRyder
I see the ship of fools is under full sail... I do love the predictability...

I’ve had Hondas, Kawasakis, a Yamaha and 2 Ducatis.

Japanese bikes are fine if you want plastic chrome and paint that looks like it was put on by a drunk 5 year old with a dollar store paint can (witch Kawasaki will refuse to fix BTW).

Here is an idea, if you don’t like Harleys just don’t read/reply to Harley threads... especially if you refuse to even try the one you are railing against.


Wouldn't it be reasonable to accept that some people, for their own reasons, just don't like what you like? Are you so sensitive about whether people like everything else you own, or is it just your Harley? I mean, nobody said your wife was ugly or your child was stupid. Just let it go and enjoy your bike, unless the adulation of others is why you bought it.


It's a double standard...it's okay for the guys who like Harleys to say negative things about metric bikes, but if the guys who like metrics say anything negative about Harleys, then we're haters and bashers...
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: DdDd
Something must've been broken. It should do 135 in second lol...


Yeah, he said the speedo is like almost 20 mph off. Also, first time riding something that fast.
 
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: SlipperyPete
Originally Posted By: DuckRyder
It would be really nice if we could just talk reasonably about motorcycles.

This board has proved itself incapable of that time and time again, particularly if the MoCo is involved.

When someone basically says “it sucks, but I have never ridden it and don’t intend to” then they’ve shown what they are. There is no point is continuing a discussion with that person.


Talk reasonably? You mean like this?

Originally Posted By: DuckRyder
I see the ship of fools is under full sail... I do love the predictability...

I’ve had Hondas, Kawasakis, a Yamaha and 2 Ducatis.

Japanese bikes are fine if you want plastic chrome and paint that looks like it was put on by a drunk 5 year old with a dollar store paint can (witch Kawasaki will refuse to fix BTW).

Here is an idea, if you don’t like Harleys just don’t read/reply to Harley threads... especially if you refuse to even try the one you are railing against.


Wouldn't it be reasonable to accept that some people, for their own reasons, just don't like what you like? Are you so sensitive about whether people like everything else you own, or is it just your Harley? I mean, nobody said your wife was ugly or your child was stupid. Just let it go and enjoy your bike, unless the adulation of others is why you bought it.


It's a double standard...it's okay for the guys who like Harleys to say negative things about metric bikes, but if the guys who like metrics say anything negative about Harleys, then we're haters and bashers...


Although I'm a Harley fan, the foreign competition is excellent. For my style of riding, Harley is the best. I can easily customize my bike to fit my ergos and tastes.
 
Originally Posted By: oilpsi2high
OP - Have you ever ridden anything other than a Harley for more than one day? I'm sure it's a good bike for what it is, but they didn't really make that many drastic changes to make this thing into a cutting edge canyon carver like you're describing. It's a 700lb motorcycle with a little bit more power than the previous version, along with being low to the ground so your chicken strips will show well before you scrape a peg. Just some food for thought.


The new generation softail is that much better. You have to ride it to believe it.
 
Originally Posted By: Silverado12
Originally Posted By: oilpsi2high
OP - Have you ever ridden anything other than a Harley for more than one day? I'm sure it's a good bike for what it is, but they didn't really make that many drastic changes to make this thing into a cutting edge canyon carver like you're describing. It's a 700lb motorcycle with a little bit more power than the previous version, along with being low to the ground so your chicken strips will show well before you scrape a peg. Just some food for thought.


The new generation softail is that much better. You have to ride it to believe it.


Even though I haven't ridden one, I have no doubt it's much better than previous Harley models, however, considering the bikes I've owned and ridden, I doubt I would find it impressive...
 
Originally Posted By: Silverado12
Well, I rode a friend's modified Hayabusa yesterday. That thing will scare you it's so fast. In a different league, though. Dang bike will do 135 in third gear.

Originally Posted By: DdDd
Something must've been broken. It should do 135 in second lol...


Here is the calculated Speed vs Gear at redline for a 2000 Busa with stock gearing. Looks like 135 in 3rd is correct. 02SE had it right of course because he's a Busa guy.
grin.gif


10,600 RPM Redline - ignition cut-off controlled by ECM.

Gear - MPH
1st - 78.7
2nd - 106.2
3rd - 134.8
4th - 160.1
5th - 181.1
6th - 197.2
 
Now for the important question: Do you have the new tires mounted on that legendary 2000?

I think there's some sort of law against letting such a machine sit for too long..
grin.gif
 
Originally Posted By: 02SE
Now for the important question: Do you have the new tires mounted on that legendary 2000?

I think there's some sort of law against letting such a machine sit for too long..
grin.gif



Shamefully, the new tires are not mounted yet.
frown.gif
I only rode the Busa twice this summer. Too many other things going on, and the XSR900 has taken over because it's just a more fun bike to ride. I'll probably try to sell the Busa next spring. It just needs the tires and new brake pads installed, which I have sitting ready for installation at some point - did everything else last summer.
 
Originally Posted By: endeavor to persevere



How insecure must one be to bother with defending a corporation on the internet against people who don't like their products, as if their own sense of self worth was based on their ownership of an object? Plenty of pathetic to go around. [/quote]

Bend over, reach up grab your shoulders, and pull downward. When you hear a pop you will know what it is. [/quote]

C'mon, you can do better than that. Tell me, do you get so nasty if someone likes a different brand of toaster than you have or is it just your Harley?
 
Originally Posted By: DuckRyder
Originally Posted By: SlipperyPete
Originally Posted By: DuckRyder
It would be really nice if we could just talk reasonably about motorcycles.

This board has proved itself incapable of that time and time again, particularly if the MoCo is involved.

When someone basically says “it sucks, but I have never ridden it and don’t intend to” then they’ve shown what they are. There is no point is continuing a discussion with that person.


Talk reasonably? You mean like this?

Originally Posted By: DuckRyder
I see the ship of fools is under full sail... I do love the predictability...

I’ve had Hondas, Kawasakis, a Yamaha and 2 Ducatis.

Japanese bikes are fine if you want plastic chrome and paint that looks like it was put on by a drunk 5 year old with a dollar store paint can (witch Kawasaki will refuse to fix BTW).

Here is an idea, if you don’t like Harleys just don’t read/reply to Harley threads... especially if you refuse to even try the one you are railing against.


Wouldn't it be reasonable to accept that some people, for their own reasons, just don't like what you like? Are you so sensitive about whether people like everything else you own, or is it just your Harley? I mean, nobody said your wife was ugly or your child was stupid. Just let it go and enjoy your bike, unless the adulation of others is why you bought it.


I do not care what you or anyone else thinks of my stuff at all. Though I see you’ve climbed aboard the ship for the trip.

I did forget to mention the great expanding Ducati fuel tank debacle, and the melting Honda dash, though Ducati fixed it without complaint and Honda fixed it with significant complaint.




You put in a lot of effort for someone who doesn't care. Most people who don't care just let things go.
 
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: Silverado12
All I have to say is ride it. You'll change your biased opinion. USA#1.


I highly doubt that...having owned bikes like the Honda V-65 Magna, Yamaha V-Max, Suzuki M109R, and Triumph Rocket III, all bikes that could be considered to be in the same class, I can say without a doubt I would be underwhelmed. This bike may be impressive compared to other Harleys, but it's still laughable compared to other make's models...


LMAO....talk about trying to overcompensate for your shortcomings. Having ridden every one of these bikes listed I can say you have some pretty bad tastes. The Magna and V-Max had frames as flexible as spaghetti. I still recall the near death experience at 130 mph on the Magna outside Sturgis on a straight road. The bike couldn't even handle the slight dips in the road, let alone take a sweeper. And speaking of sweepers, the V-Max flexed so bad even the most loyal riders admitted the bike handles like [censored]. The Suzuki had more clutch and trans problems than any bike I know of. Can't tell you how [censored] off my buddy was at his bike and the problems he had with it. The forums are filled with nightmares. And it's not even fast. For a guy prone to dissing Harleys, that choice of bike is really laughable. As for the Triumph, why would anybody buy that bike? It's obviously aimed at the "muscle bike quarter mile" crowd, and there are scores of faster bikes out there. In fact, even a Harley V-Rod is faster. 2001 VRSC ran 11.36@119 mph vs the 2010 R3 11.48@115 mph.

The most amazing part of your list is that you most likely don't even own any of those losers anymore, pretty much proving how worthless they became. LMAO

Source is Wikipedia list of fastest production bikes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fastest_production_motorcycles_by_acceleration
 
Originally Posted By: blueglide88


The Magna and V-Max had frames as flexible as spaghetti. I still recall the near death experience at 130 mph on the Magna outside Sturgis on a straight road. The bike couldn't even handle the slight dips in the road, let alone take a sweeper. And speaking of sweepers, the V-Max flexed so bad even the most loyal riders admitted the bike handles like [censored].



Kind of like this you mean: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weG2GHTYQuM (but one example among many, many, many others)

Mind you, the Magna and V-Max you so eagerly diss were built in the 80s, so they at least have an excuse of sorts... care to elaborate on the Harley death wobble (yes, it even has its own name, lol)

FWIW, am not a real fan of the Rocket 3, but spent a few days riding one and must admit it has it own charm....
 
It's funny how people believe only what supports their argument...Harley guys don't believe anything negative about their bikes even when it's proven fact...
 
How many Harleys that you rode wobbled. Hot shot. All motorcycle brands can be plagued with a wobble from time to time. Why do you always focus on just Harley. Oh we know why.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: grampi
It's funny how people believe only what supports their argument...Harley guys don't believe anything negative about their bikes even when it's proven fact...


Grampi the one thing we can count on is you never have facts when it comes to Harleys.
 
Originally Posted By: endeavor to persevere
Of the many Harleys I have had in my life not a one of them has ever had a wobble of any kind. Of all the people I know that ride Harleys not a one of then have ever experienced this. How many Harleys that you have ridden experienced this wobble you speak of?

For me, none. Though the number of Harleys I've ridden is small.

Once over a 2 day period I saw 3 different Harleys do a weird wobble on the freeway.

I have zero doubt that some Harleys have wobble problems.
 
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Originally Posted By: grampi
It's funny how people believe only what supports their argument...Harley guys don't believe anything negative about their bikes even when it's proven fact...


Grampi the one thing we can count on is you never have facts when it comes to Harleys.



Just because you don't like the info I present doesn't mean it isn't fact...oh wait a minute, yes it does...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom