hi,
engine oils need to be changed regularly (period). no buts, no whatever.
however, a lot of synthetics specially claim long drain intervals, leaving their mineral/conventional counterparts less attractive to potential busy customers. this however comes at a price. synthetics (grp iv/v) costs more than mineral/conventional.
given this premise, it would be more costly then to have short drain intervals for synthetics - no questions about it.
since conventional/mineral oil costs a lot less than synthetics (grp iv/v), would it be better for an engine to receive mineral/conventional and short drain intervals?
btw, i am not promoting oil here, just an example. in my country mobil 1 xhp costs around $4.44 per liter while rp or redline 10w30 or redline costs around $12.22. now that's a lot. for my car the oil filter costs around $3.78. btw, i'm not including labor costs since i'll be doing diy. gasoline price is not included since it is somehow negligible since the store where i buy those stuff is just along the route to and from home/work. though i'll be diy'ing oil change, though it will consume time, let's not consider time factor for this.
just to be clear again, its not the brands that i am comparing here is the being convetional and synthetic (grp iv/v).
assuming that i will be using 4L of oil + filter, i'll be spending $21.54 for conventional and 52.66 for redline/rp. in theory, synthetics can last a year, while mineral/conventional 6 months. given the prices and the conditions presented above (such as labor costs and transportation cost negligible):
- a bi-annual convetional oil change will definitely cost less than an annual synthetic change;
- however, if i do a 3rd oil change and subsequent (quarterly or so) for a mineral/conventional, it would cost more than a synthetic;
- however, doing shorter drain intervals regardless of the oil will definitely assure a cleaner engine;
- however, this would cost more than a synthetic (grp iv/v) even if conventional/mineral oil was used.
given the conditions above, is it right to say that i'm guaranteed of a cleaner engine at the cost of more if i'll be doing short drain intervals using mineral/conventional oil?
engine oils need to be changed regularly (period). no buts, no whatever.
however, a lot of synthetics specially claim long drain intervals, leaving their mineral/conventional counterparts less attractive to potential busy customers. this however comes at a price. synthetics (grp iv/v) costs more than mineral/conventional.
given this premise, it would be more costly then to have short drain intervals for synthetics - no questions about it.
since conventional/mineral oil costs a lot less than synthetics (grp iv/v), would it be better for an engine to receive mineral/conventional and short drain intervals?
btw, i am not promoting oil here, just an example. in my country mobil 1 xhp costs around $4.44 per liter while rp or redline 10w30 or redline costs around $12.22. now that's a lot. for my car the oil filter costs around $3.78. btw, i'm not including labor costs since i'll be doing diy. gasoline price is not included since it is somehow negligible since the store where i buy those stuff is just along the route to and from home/work. though i'll be diy'ing oil change, though it will consume time, let's not consider time factor for this.
just to be clear again, its not the brands that i am comparing here is the being convetional and synthetic (grp iv/v).
assuming that i will be using 4L of oil + filter, i'll be spending $21.54 for conventional and 52.66 for redline/rp. in theory, synthetics can last a year, while mineral/conventional 6 months. given the prices and the conditions presented above (such as labor costs and transportation cost negligible):
- a bi-annual convetional oil change will definitely cost less than an annual synthetic change;
- however, if i do a 3rd oil change and subsequent (quarterly or so) for a mineral/conventional, it would cost more than a synthetic;
- however, doing shorter drain intervals regardless of the oil will definitely assure a cleaner engine;
- however, this would cost more than a synthetic (grp iv/v) even if conventional/mineral oil was used.
given the conditions above, is it right to say that i'm guaranteed of a cleaner engine at the cost of more if i'll be doing short drain intervals using mineral/conventional oil?