That’s a Napa part number for those rotors and they retail for $119 each.
If they can do it right now, do it so the trip is not ruined. If you are on a trip, what is the trip worth?
Why would anyone waive the diag fee - that was time spent to discover the issue. Repair is a separate operation. The tech would not get paid for their time spent on diag if the fee was waived.What bothers me about that bill is the $129.50 for diagnosing, usually when you have the work done they waive that fee. Top that off with a diff service with 3 pints of fluid for over a $170 is almost $300 and 32 bucks for some silicone is padding the bill a bit IMO. The cheap bast.. didn't even throw a new air filter in.
No one got shafted. This is a repair estimate.That's not the point. The point is IMO, he got shafted. What kind of diff service did he get for 149.50 labor
I am pretty sure you are correct.It seems a bit excessive to me. I think that P30 chassis is just a 1 ton dually with 12500 GVWR. I know they used to put way bigger RV's on them than they should have and they always sagged in the rear after a couple years. Like others have said they seemed to mark the prices of parts up 2x retail. Labor might be OK, I think they have drum E brakes and might have to pull the axle to get new pads on Hence the rear end service.
Somebody did. The person who is paying. Don't ask.No one got shafted. This is a repair estimate.
Looks like the shop uses a parts matrix. Not uncommon.
Why would anyone waive the diag fee - that was time spent to discover the issue. Repair is a separate operation. The tech would not get paid for their time spent on diag if the fee was waived.
Dunno. I believe the answer is yes. Others more knowledgeable than me can chime in...Did they have to pull the axles and press the rotors off the hubs?
The “few minutes” spent is the tech working for free if he/she is flat rate. I can agree that a diagnostic charge should sometimes be reduced for something extremely simple (perhaps 1/2 hr instead of the normal 1hr), but it is industry standard that diagnostic time is something that a technician needs to be compensated for.We are not talking about computer diagnostics for a intermittent or complex problem here, its a leaking brake. A few min job a best unless you are lazy or incompetent.
In this area for simple diagnostics the fee is most of the time waived if the customer has the work done, the mechanic has work he may not have had that day.
Come on too strong with diagnostic fees and you will get a bad rep for being a clip joint right quick. You should charge for a time consuming and difficult diagnostic session but not for a leaking water pump, brake line/cylinder, collapsed strut or shock, etc. Common sense.
https://autoshopinvoice.com/blog/auto-shop-invoice-basics-to-diagnostic-fee-or-not-to-diagnostic-fee
The “few minutes” spent is the tech working for free if he/she is flat rate. I can agree that a diagnostic charge should sometimes be reduced for something extremely simple (perhaps 1/2 hr instead of the normal 1hr), but it is industry standard that diagnostic time is something that a technician needs to be compensated for.