New to me vehicle: 2018 Toyota Sequoia

Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
24,210
Location
Colorado Springs, CO
So, I got Sequoia. Some of you know my initial question about it:

I was trying to figure out some alternatives due to gas consumption, but with 3rd kid on the way and the fact we need clearance, a capable vehicle (nothing dramatic) minivan was out of the question.
I checked some Expeditions and Tahoe's, but I am not willing to chance it with those transmissions and lifter issues. Armada was out of question, too small.
I found one in Indianapolis with 64,000+ miles. These things are expensive!!! I found one for $39k, and it seems the more problems the current Sequoia/Tundra has, the more the price of the old one is going up.
I flew to Indianapolis on Friday. The ticket prices were absolutely ridiculous, so I used my United points. Hotels were pricey too. Now, I know Indianapolis is not some tourist mecca, so it was surprising. I decided to come there, get a car, and just drive toward St. Louis and crash somewhere cheaper.
Well, at ORD I find out Taylor Swift is 3 nights in Indianapolis. I mean, the flight, the airport was absolute circus. UAL flight had all female cockpit crew, and captain told passengers that since flight is short, they should use small window of opportunity and "shake it off" in the lavatory. I thought that was funny.
Anyway, on my way to the dealer, I checked hotel prices, and I guess they dropped prices bcs. they did not sell some rooms. So, decided to stay there and get myself some Portillo's Italian beef dipped with hot peppers.
Picked up car, went to the hotel, ate dinner, crashed, woke up, Portillo's again (When I travel to Europe, I try to book flights through ORD with enough window time to go out and get Portillo's, so don't judge :) ).
So, I hit the road after Italian beef for breakfast (again, don't judge). First impressions about car after some 1,200 miles:

Good:
Obviously, we got this because of space. It has ample amounts, and considering our road trip habits, huge armrests can serve as tables for some lunch. The middle seat backrest can be lowered for kids to use as a table. The seats are big, wide, good support, nothing like Sienna I had or new Sienna or Grand Highlander. They are not as good as my E90 BMW seats, but very few are. JBL sound system is good, but since it is 2018 there is no Apple CarPlay. So, I will have to replace that as my wife is adamant to have that. I am thrilled about the real 4WD, 4LO and center locker. I would prefer rear locker, but it is what it is. My buddy has a big off-road shop and is a Toyota expert, so I might see with him about some aftermarket options later. I like all the physical buttons. No nonsense. Now, I can see why people like those electric trunk window. SInce I love driving with windows down, or sunroof open, this thing lets air in, but with much less noise and wind.

So So:
Well, cabin is wide and sometimes is hard to reach some buttons and knobs. But, not big deal. The driving dynamic is well, that of a truck, and this thing packs 400lbs more over Tundra. I think Limited, one I got, is just 30lbs short of 6,000, while Platinum goes over 6,000. The brakes are, well, Toyota. They are mushy and don't inspire absolutely any confidence. But they do OK. The dealership installed brand new rotors and pads, so I won't do any monkey business with that until they vibrate (I am expecting that) or the pads need to be changed.

Bad:

OK, gas consumption is bad, but not as bad as I thought. Based on reviews, I was expecting on HWY 14-15mpg, but to my surprise, at one point, the computer was showing 19.4mpg!!! One tank I manage to get 18.9mpg, generally driving around 7-9mph over speed limit. The consumption did get bad in Kansas as I was gaining altitude and had a fairly strong headwind, ending up at 15.4mpg on one tank, doing maybe 82mph on cruise control. I will see around Colorado Springs, but not too concerned as BMW is daily. I was wondering how consumption is going to be considering I do drive aggressively. But car, regardless that it has ample of power, is lazy! It is a truck, and unlike that BMW X7 that I rented, which "tells you" when you sit: "buckle up and hit it," this vehicle is very lazy and definitely does not inspire aggressive and fast driving. I was expecting though that it will "struggle" keeping 80-85mph. The reason is that the Honda Pilot and Sienna always had a kind of need to be pushed to stay at 80-85mph. It's like they are out of their comfort zone there. All Euro cars I had, I had to watch not to go over, as they wanted to go faster. I found out that most Japanese cars need to "push" at higher speeds as if they were out of their comfort zone there. This one actually does not have that problem.
Steering wheel feedback is absolutely horrid! I mean for the love of God WHY? I get the desire to have a light steering wheel in the city, but this thing is ridiculous. Especially driving BMW and then this. I found myself going from center to lock so fast that I could hear the steering rack bumping to the limit.
So there it is. I will use this in the mountains when skiing with kids (I use BMW when skiing alone, which is 90% of time), but considering weight, I am not expecting it to be that good. I know it will go forward good, but my definition of vehicle being good in snow is how it handles and brakes (of course, snow tires will be installed. Regular size is 275/55 R20, but I will get 18" wheels and install snow tires 255/70 R18).
IMG_3893.webp


Absolutely love this practical, physical button set up. But it is definitely blast from the past. One thing is that 4WD knob is too similar and too close to others.
IMG_3909.webp


Not bad:
IMG_3910.webp


There was Atlas in front of Portillo's next to Sequoia. I thought it was not that big of a difference in size. Well, I realized it is once I parked in the garage.
IMG_3903.webp


I found this small cup holder, in addition to two big ones, very convenient for my quad espresso. Very European! :)
IMG_3911.webp
IMG_3892.webp
IMG_3895.webp
 
Last edited:
They don't call the 5.7L the "thirsty dinosaur" for no good reason ... But they are pretty reliable, decently quiet, and have good power. Perhaps a tad inconvenient when it comes to major maintenance issues; lots of plumbing hoses everywhere to deal with and the water pump is a royal PITB.

I like the ol' skool approach of that generation, tho. V-8; body on frame; RWD bias; etc. I have limited experience driving a friend's Tundra of similar vintage and I really like the "feel" of the controls and the operation of the truck.
 
Last edited:
I've liked them for some time and the engine is a great one. I couldn't get past the low gas mileage for my driving habits. ENjoy it! Should be great addition with the 3rd kid!
 
So, I got Sequoia. Some of you know my initial question about it:

I was trying to figure out some alternatives due to gas consumption, but with 3rd kid on the way and the fact we need clearance, a capable vehicle (nothing dramatic) minivan was out of the question.
I checked some Expeditions and Tahoe's, but I am not willing to chance it with those transmissions and lifter issues. Armada was out of question, too small.
I found one in Indianapolis with 64,000+ miles. These things are expensive!!! I found one for $39k, and it seems the more problems the current Sequoia/Tundra has, the more the price of the old one is going up.
I flew to Indianapolis on Friday. The ticket prices were absolutely ridiculous, so I used my United points. Hotels were pricey too. Now, I know Indianapolis is not some tourist mecca, so it was surprising. I decided to come there, get a car, and just drive toward St. Louis and crash somewhere cheaper.
Well, at ORD I find out Taylor Swift is 3 nights in Indianapolis. I mean, the flight, the airport was absolute circus. UAL flight had all female cockpit crew, and captain told passengers that since flight is short, they should use small window of opportunity and "shake it off" in the lavatory. I thought that was funny.
Anyway, on my way to the dealer, I checked hotel prices, and I guess they dropped prices bcs. they did not sell some rooms. So, decided to stay there and get myself some Portillo's Italian beef dipped with hot peppers.
Picked up car, went to the hotel, ate dinner, crashed, woke up, Portillo's again (When I travel to Europe, I try to book flights through ORD with enough window time to go out and get Portillo's, so don't judge :) ).
So, I hit the road after Italian beef for breakfast (again, don't judge). First impressions about car after some 1,200 miles:

Good:
Obviously, we got this because of space. It has ample amounts, and considering our road trip habits, huge armrests can serve as tables for some lunch. The middle seat backrest can be lowered for kids to use as a table. The seats are big, wide, good support, nothing like Sienna I had or new Sienna or Grand Highlander. They are not as good as my E90 BMW seats, but very few are. JBL sound system is good, but since it is 2018 there is no Apple CarPlay. So, I will have to replace that as my wife is adamant to have that. I am thrilled about the real 4WD, 4LO and center locker. I would prefer rear locker, but it is what it is. My buddy has a big off-road shop and is a Toyota expert, so I might see with him about some aftermarket options later. I like all the physical buttons. No nonsense. Now, I can see why people like those electric trunk window. SInce I love driving with windows down, or sunroof open, this thing lets air in, but with much less noise and wind.

So So:
Well, cabin is wide and sometimes is hard to reach some buttons and knobs. But, not big deal. The driving dynamic is well, that of a truck, and this thing packs 400lbs more over Tundra. I think Limited, one I got, is just 30lbs short of 6,000, while Platinum goes over 6,000. The brakes are, well, Toyota. They are mushy and don't inspire absolutely any confidence. But they do OK. The dealership installed brand new rotors and pads, so I won't do any monkey business with that until they vibrate (I am expecting that) or the pads need to be changed.

Bad:

OK, gas consumption is bad, but not as bad as I thought. Based on reviews, I was expecting on HWY 14-15mpg, but to my surprise, at one point, the computer was showing 19.4mpg!!! One tank I manage to get 18.9mpg, generally driving around 7-9mph over speed limit. The consumption did get bad in Kansas as I was gaining altitude and had a fairly strong headwind, ending up at 15.4mpg on one tank, doing maybe 82mph on cruise control. I will see around Colorado Springs, but not too concerned as BMW is daily. I was wondering how consumption is going to be considering I do drive aggressively. But car, regardless that it has ample of power, is lazy! It is a truck, and unlike that BMW X7 that I rented, which "tells you" when you sit: "buckle up and hit it," this vehicle is very lazy and definitely does not inspire aggressive and fast driving. I was expecting though that it will "struggle" keeping 80-85mph. The reason is that the Honda Pilot and Sienna always had a kind of need to be pushed to stay at 80-85mph. It's like they are out of their comfort zone there. All Euro cars I had, I had to watch not to go over, as they wanted to go faster. I found out that most Japanese cars need to "push" at higher speeds as if they were out of their comfort zone there. This one actually does not have that problem.
Steering wheel feedback is absolutely horrid! I mean for the love of God WHY? I get the desire to have a light steering wheel in the city, but this thing is ridiculous. Especially driving BMW and then this. I found myself going from center to lock so fast that I could hear the steering rack bumping to the limit.
So there it is. I will use this in the mountains when skiing with kids (I use BMW when skiing alone, which is 90% of time), but considering weight, I am not expecting it to be that good. I know it will go forward good, but my definition of vehicle being good in snow is how it handles and brakes (of course, snow tires will be installed. Regular size is 275/55 R20, but I will get 18" wheels and install snow tires 255/70 R18).
View attachment 248420

Absolutely love this practical, physical button set up. But it is definitely blast from the past. One thing is that 4WD knob is too similar and too close to others.
View attachment 248421

Not bad:
View attachment 248422

There was Atlas in front of Portillo's next to Sequoia. I thought it was not that big of a difference in size. Well, I realized it is once I parked in the garage.
View attachment 248423

I found this small cup holder, in addition to two big ones, very convenient for my quad espresso. Very European! :)
View attachment 248424View attachment 248425View attachment 248426
18 mpg is killer with such a large SUV, I get 14 average in my LX570. enjoy it
 
They don't call the 5.7L the "thirsty dinosaur" for no good reason ... But they are pretty reliable, decently quiet, and have good power. Perhaps a tad inconvenient when it comes to major maintenance issues; lots of plumbing hoses everywhere to deal with and the water pump is a royal PITB.

I like the ol' skool approach of that generation, tho. V-8; body on frame; RWD bias; etc. I have limited experience driving a friend's Tundra of similar vintage and I really like the "feel" of the controls and the operation of the truck.
Yeah, I like that longitudinal RWD platform. New Sequoia is huge disappointment. I was waiting that one bcs. gas mileage.
 
Congratulations. That is the best full size SUV on the road. Built like a tank. I had one for several years and loved it. The wife hated it; too big. I would get another one in a heartbeat, but, well you know.

The center differential is switchable AWD or 2WD made by Torsen. This is the best feature IMHO.

2nd gen's in good shape are hard to find... sales were very low in the last few years of production, only about 1000 per month. Toyota did a very poor job marketing the product. I really thought they would kill it. Maybe they should have because IMHO, the current Sequoia is a disaster.
 
The 3rd row in the new Sequoia is horrible. My Pilot has more room, seriously.

When we went to NY Auto show I was shocked how poor that was, like old regular Highlander size it seemed.

We look often at the new full size SUV's, always miss the '03 Sequoia. Wife would take that back anytime if it wasn't rotting away.

Good luck with it. TundraSolutions was the main site I was on back then and some ToyotaNation. Since it was shared platform with the Tundra they had all the problems/fixes etc.

If hoping to keep it, consider FluidFilm or Woolwax to get everything coated.

Back then Eaton was making the limited slip diffs for TRD to buy optional and have installed. I wanted it but $$ and priorities. All the places I took it there was really only 1-2 times I was looking for more than the brake activated traction control covered. 4Lo, center diff lock, good tires took care of beach, gravel, light mud to hunting. I think ARB also had kits so you could go full locked front and rear.
 
Last edited:
This was open road. From little bit in city, I would say 14mpg on average is about right. But, I use BMW as daily so not overly concerned about that.
Yeah I mean to expect "good" mpg out of something like that is silly.

Efficiency and mpg are different things of course, you know that. For its size and weight, I think they are very efficient.
 
Good idea on spraying some areas with some rust preventative as mentioned above especially the running boards, trailer hitch, door bottoms, etc. Someone posted an old Land Cruiser for sale on here a few days ago with some rusty areas. Which would show you were to focus on.

I remember test driving a first Gen when they first came out. Really liked how maneuverable it was for such a big SUV.
 
As for the “lazy feeling”, I agree! I have Pedal Commander on the Tundra because tip in was too lazy for me with factory specs. I didn’t go crazy with the settings but now when you poke at the throttle, the 5.7 comes to life much sooner without having to push the pedal down ½ or ⅔ the way.

As for mpg, I average 14-15mpg in mixed driving.
 
As for the “lazy feeling”, I agree! I have Pedal Commander on the Tundra because tip in was too lazy for me with factory specs. I didn’t go crazy with the settings but now when you poke at the throttle, the 5.7 comes to life much sooner without having to push the pedal down ½ or ⅔ the way.

As for mpg, I average 14-15mpg in mixed driving.
I did not mean a lazy feeling when it comes to the engine. Personally, I don't have an issue with it. It is an overall lazy feeling. It is body on frame, there is no much dynamic there. So, I just drive the way the car feels comfortable. It is the opposite of my BMW, which feels in its element if you are pushing it instead of just coasting. That is OK with me, because if I tried to drive Sequoia like that, or even like Sienna or Atlas I had, I highly doubt I would get over 10mpg in city or 15 on hwy.
 
Back
Top