I'm sure someone else can explain it better than me. But here is my go at trying to explain it.
There are additives in motor oil that are designed to protect the engine from wear. Some bond to the metal surfaces inside the engine. The additives in new motor oil are very aggressive at cleaning the engine, to the point that they start cleaning off this protective layer, from the metal surfaces.
It takes much longer for the protective additives in the new motor oil, to bond to the metal surfaces, than it does for the cleaners to clean.
Thus, the theory is that there is a period when the engine is not protected as well, until the new additives complete bonding to the metal surfaces. That's the theory at least.
Some people have used this study to claim that longer a oil change interval results in less engine wear, as the engine is less frequently exposed to this "1000 mile" higher wear period. Others have said that the study is not entirely sound.
There are additives in motor oil that are designed to protect the engine from wear. Some bond to the metal surfaces inside the engine. The additives in new motor oil are very aggressive at cleaning the engine, to the point that they start cleaning off this protective layer, from the metal surfaces.
It takes much longer for the protective additives in the new motor oil, to bond to the metal surfaces, than it does for the cleaners to clean.
Thus, the theory is that there is a period when the engine is not protected as well, until the new additives complete bonding to the metal surfaces. That's the theory at least.
Some people have used this study to claim that longer a oil change interval results in less engine wear, as the engine is less frequently exposed to this "1000 mile" higher wear period. Others have said that the study is not entirely sound.