Please explain to us where you heard such a thing.
Don't read unqualified misinformationPlease explain to me like I am a stupid 2 year old, how changing the oil, increases wear for the next 1,000 miles?
It’s not misinformation. There is a study out there about this which I’m sure someone will post pretty soonDon't read unqualified misinformation
How does one identify unqualified misinformation without reading it?Don't read unqualified misinformation
Would you happen to remember the thread? If anything, BITOGers would absolutely change it every 1000miles if oil was cheaper lol.
Mechanics are not tribologists. Most of them honestly don’t have the technical knowledge about motor oil. Nowadays a lot of them can’t even properly diagnose a tough problem. They just replace parts.I don't remember which thread, but it was just yesterday I read it on here.
This morning I asked 6 mechanics if they ever heard about this, and they all said BS.
So I would like someone to explain how clean new oil, lubricates worse than dirt old oil.
Eons ago I recall someone doing this on a Camaro... ran oil for 15k but sampled & UOA every 1k. LS motor running Mobil 1 if memory is working. Spike in wear metals after oil change? actually I think the ppm increase at each sample time was less with miles. If there was 10ppm after 1k, it was like 15ppm at 2k, 17ppm at 3k, 18ppm at 4k, 19ppm at 5k, something like that.I’ve been on this forum since before y2k (though under a different handle after something got messed up). I’ve heard this discussed going back decades. Seems like there was a study quoted 15 years ago that cited it.
The study was done by BITOG member 3 Mad Ponchos, alas, the old website no longer exists and I couldn't find any recent version in Internet Archive either. Maybe someone saved it locally?Eons ago I recall someone doing this on a Camaro... ran oil for 15k but sampled & UOA every 1k.