99% also don’t wash new underwear before using it and live happy lives.I bet 99% of car owners don’t do this yet their engines live happy and long lives

99% also don’t wash new underwear before using it and live happy lives.I bet 99% of car owners don’t do this yet their engines live happy and long lives
Any links to where Honda has said anything about this?I have read on a different forum that Honda (and probably some other auto manufacturers) don't want the 1st oil change done early because they use some type of moly assembly lube that they want circulating through the engine during the break-in period.
Why?Were it obvious, there's be no request for an explanation. I'd like an explanation as well.
I bet 99% of car owners don’t do this yet their engines live happy and long lives
But do they live long lives?99% also don’t wash new underwear before using it and live happy lives.![]()
Honda is a green company . Not changing the oil means less oil waste. There are the high additives because of the normal oil change interval.Why?
Long itchy lives.But do they live long lives?
But one thread now has another debate over how often a filter bypass opens - so I’d rather toss one early - then step up to 20 microns and a known lube … Once in the life of a vehicle won’t break the bank!Way back in the day the users manual did say to change early - I am talking 60's / 70's maybe. Like 500 or 1000 miles.
There may be many reasons why they don't do so now, but there absolutely is a lot of debris in the first 1000 miles. Its not "left over", its break in where - from imperfect parts rubbing against other imperfect parts - like bearings and seating in piston rings on the bore. These parts all have a tollerance, and their designed to wear in to the exact machines surfaces with which they match during early use.
In theory they oil filter should catch that, but as mentioned, if you want to rely on that feel free, but some of us don't.
Many small engines still have a break in spec / time, probably because they have no oil filter.
Machining and clearance checking has been quite good and appropriate for over a century. Materials and foundry methods employed have improved.Sure, but even if the filter catches some debris, changing the oil & filter early doesn't help. Once the filter captures that debris, it's captured forever, not going back into the engine. It could become an issue if the filter catches so much debris that it fills up the pleats and impairs the flow, but that ain't gonna happen unless there is something seriously wrong with the engine.
In days of yore, engines weren't machined like they are now, and relied on proper break-in procedures to seat the piston rings & cylinder bores. It was common practice to change the oil after the first 1,000 miles. Now, not so much.
PS: to answer the OP question, "none". But it's a free country, anyone can waste their time and money if they want to.
Most people's "filters" are only good for removing particles lower than 1000 microns. Some have better filtration than others.99% also don’t wash new underwear before using it and live happy lives.![]()
Valid point. My wife has a new Toyota and it comes with 2 years of free "maintenance", effectively oil changes, tire rotations, and inspections. I ask her if they say anything like air filters, wipers, etc need replaced and they don't. I've warned her that once the free part is done or the warranty is over, it will change.Oil changes are low margin work, and often used as a carrot to dangle for potential customers, to get them into the shop and then try to up-sell them on other services for their higher mileage car.
Honda may do what the rumor says but they consider it proprietary and simply won't acknowledge doing it.I think that if this were an official position from Honda, you'd find it mentioned in the owner's manual or in a service manual.
I've always changed early. Never ever an issue with an oil burnerIn the absence of break in oil, the extra abrasion may help bed in the piston rings.
That's why Honda says not to change early.
I wouldn't be surprised if people who changed early got oil consumption.
Is there evidence to support this?I think the point is that they could be even happier.
Have you tried calling Honda corporate?Any links to where Honda has said anything about this?
The few times I've looked for an official position from Honda, the result is someone on a random forum saying Honda said it, or every now and then it appears in a dealer website FAQ, but I've not been able to find anything official from Honda. Even you are referencing a forum post, not anything directly from Honda. I think that if this were an official position from Honda, you'd find it mentioned in the owner's manual or in a service manual.
Maybe the info is out there and I've just been unable to find it.
Let me save someone the phone call.... It will go something like this:Have you tried calling Honda corporate?
There is none. There are probably 10x as many cars on the road which didn't have it done and have as many more more miles on them before they're retired.What proof is out there for these people to say you need to do your first oil change at 1000 miles for longevity, when the does not have anything in it?