Seems to be the question of the week, if you look around you'll find lots of information on this site. Even a very similar question posted just yesterday I think. But having said that, what kind of contradictory information are you finding and where?Hi guys,
New to this, Ford rec 10w-30 MC semi syn. I plan on 5000 OCI's. I'm reading all sorts of contradictory stuff about semi Vs. Full Syn. Can someone explain the virtues of either to me please?
Seems to be the question of the week, if you look around you'll find lots of information on this site. Even a very similar question posted just yesterday I think. But having said that, what kind of contradictory information are you finding and where?
One should always focus on the required or recommended specification, approval or license rather than base stock composition. What does your owner's manual say in regards to that
SN+ (or its superseded license SP) is fairly stringent as far as API licenses go. Any oil meeting that specification and also of an appropriate grade will work well.Manual says Motorcraft, and "SN+".
Thanks, this is helpful. It's a Corsair. I just changed out the factory fill at 900 miles, some say not to go full syn until 3000k? Mobil 1 is easy.Your owner's manual should say 5W-30. Full 'synthetics' are the best oils for avoiding turbo coking, varnish & sludge. Semi-syn probably won't do any of those things at 5,000 mile OCI, but for a few bucks more, you can have a full syn, which is actually just a highly refined conventional (Group III) oil unless you bump up to the Redlines & Amsoils of the world (Group IV and V). Mobil1 EP is a good choice for this engine due to favorable NOACK & sulfated ash numbers, as quite a number of 2.0 owners experience valve contamination due to the PVC and the sub-par oil separator Ford installed with it. You've bought a 2020 Escape / Edge / MKC, etc. ?
One reason is because they recommend or require a performance standard (API SN PLUS) which dictates the required performance of the oil. How that is achieved is up to the oil manufacturer or blender.Why would Ford not rec a full syn here, they do for various other fluids?
Recall I'm not an oil guy so I cannot evaluate all these claims. But, a common one is that certain additives work better within the molecular structure of dino.SN+ (or its superseded license SP) is fairly stringent as far as API licenses go. Any oil meeting that specification and also of an appropriate grade will work well.
So where did you see contradictory information about the benefits or hazards between semi-synthetic and fully synthetic oil?
Recall I'm not an oil guy so I cannot evaluate all these claims. But, a common one is that certain additives work better within the molecular structure of dino.
Yes, use what Ford specifies which is an oil that carries the SN PLUS (or now SP) license.Recall I'm not an oil guy so I cannot evaluate all these claims. But, a common one is that certain additives work better within the molecular structure of dino.
The larger issue for me as a car enthusiast yet not versed in the minutia of oil is that I want to do the best thing here, yet don't really understand it on the granular level required to make an informed choice. So, for me, the default position is manufacturer's rec, yet when look around, theres's contradictory information.
Why would Ford spec an oil that is not best for their products?
I would be interested in the source of this comment because at a minimum it is a misunderstanding of PCMO formulation strategy and the chemistry involved....But, a common one is that certain additives work better within the molecular structure of dino.