The term is financial repression.Cut the rate and they'll crank up the housing costs as usual. Nobody wins. Seniors get screwed on their interest and young people still can't get into a new house.
The term is financial repression.Cut the rate and they'll crank up the housing costs as usual. Nobody wins. Seniors get screwed on their interest and young people still can't get into a new house.
I talked to an Ocala realtor tonightThe term is financial repression.
I concur. Its really hard to get good housing data.Hogwash.
Source: National Association of Realtors
There is your lying source of agenda if there ever was one.
And real estate is all local anyways. Generalizations don't mean a thing.I concur. Its really hard to get good housing data.
This is absolutely true if your buying or selling a single home. But if you want accurate data for your zip code, can you get it? You can't. You only get what NAR wants you to get, which as I mentioned is not all that accurate. Even if you go look at the MLS it skips over data like seller paid for costs that are not traditional, like I mentioned. This is huge especially for new construction.And real estate is all local anyways. Generalizations don't mean a thing.
You are correct. I was there. But house prices did stagnate and go down. I had to drop the price of my house a good bit to sell and I was lucky I sold it.One has to define loss. Is the vast majority of loss jobs just early retirement? And how many of the loss jobs being replaced by new/ different jobs.
WDC of all places will do well regardless of national economy. I remember going to visit someone at Walter Reed late in 2009. Entire nation was in a challenging financial situation. I was blown away, greater WDC never got the message, it was still "high life" for building and everything else in WDC while much of the nation was in very noticeable financial challenges.
I have a top notch real estate team. I get regular report trends from San Mateo up north to Watsonville to the south.This is absolutely true if your buying or selling a single home. But if you want accurate data for your zip code, can you get it? You can't. You only get what NAR wants you to get, which as I mentioned is not all that accurate. Even if you go look at the MLS it skips over data like seller paid for costs that are not traditional, like I mentioned. This is huge especially for new construction.
There are also other reasons to get housing data. Its a huge portion of the overall economy, the overall bond market, consumer credit, etc, etc. If I want to invest in MBS for example, I need to know where housing is going. I can go to the BLS website and find out how much just about any consumer good or service changed this month, but getting accurate picture on actual home sales price is almost impossible - at a local or national level.
Condo's have their own sort of problems right now, and its not just a Florida problem. A 18 story Condo right on the river here in Charleston was recently condemned and an evacuation order given, not due to defered maintenance but primarily due to bad construction to begin with - it was built in the 70's.Kinda funny... Some of the prices around here have dropped. For example, Last December I bought a studio condo, very old and needs everything for $450K. Now the 1 bedrooms are about $500K and in much better shape.
Here's an example...
Thanks for posting this. Makes a new big issue to look at when considering a condo.Condo's have their own sort of problems right now, and its not just a Florida problem. A 18 story Condo right on the river here in Charleston was recently condemned and an evacuation order given, not due to defered maintenance but primarily due to bad construction to begin with - it was built in the 70's.
Everyone had to clear out including the townhomes that were part of the same complex. I am guessing it may need to be torn down, which is unfortunate because my guess is they will go from $500K condo's to $3M condo's in its place which no one like me will ever be able to afford.
Florida "solved" there deferred maintenance problem by kicking the can.
I was looking at Condo's downtown but I have been scared off pretty much and won't be buying one. I am sure many other potential buyers are the same.
https://www.postandcourier.com/char...cle_c633a440-b2ad-4b0f-9be5-3d54c62ae22f.htmlThanks for posting this. Makes a new big issue to look at when considering a condo.
The country's hottest housing market is in New Hampshire, according to a new report.
The ratings from Realtor.com and The Wall Street Journal took things such as the real estate market, economic health and quality of life into consideration, putting the Manchester-Nashua market in the top spot.
McIntire said that even with buyers being a little more cautious, it's still a seller's market. She said homes in the southern part of the state are only staying on the market for about a week.
I dont agree. Selling price is the price the buyer pays that is all that matters. Closing price.This is absolutely true if your buying or selling a single home. But if you want accurate data for your zip code, can you get it? You can't. You only get what NAR wants you to get, which as I mentioned is not all that accurate. Even if you go look at the MLS it skips over data like seller paid for costs that are not traditional, like I mentioned. This is huge especially for new construction.
There are also other reasons to get housing data. Its a huge portion of the overall economy, the overall bond market, consumer credit, etc, etc. If I want to invest in MBS for example, I need to know where housing is going. I can go to the BLS website and find out how much just about any consumer good or service changed this month, but getting accurate picture on actual home sales price is almost impossible - at a local or national level.
Here's Michael Bordenaro's just-posted perspective/opinion on record home prices.
I'm trying to understand that chart--baby boomers in 1976 had a 38% ownership rate? Boomers are what, about 1946 to 1964, depending on who you ask, so in 1976 they would have been about 12 to 30 years old? impressive that 38% of them were in homes. But:These people did pretty good for themselves and many of them in today's world put off marriage by a decade which would delay purchasing a home if even then. You can find any you tuber to match your position.
![]()
Good observations I must say! Honestly I didnt look to fact check that chart. Good catch. I hate the breaking down of the Generations. It adds a lot of fluff.I'm trying to understand that chart--baby boomers in 1976 had a 38% ownership rate? Boomers are what, about 1946 to 1964, depending on who you ask, so in 1976 they would have been about 12 to 30 years old? impressive that 38% of them were in homes. But:
Gen X in 1984 would have been about 4 to 20 years old. Makes sense that they would only have 10% ownership rate.
Gen Z is 1997 to 2012, so age 4 to 20. Impressive then that they are beating Gen X for similar ages. That's a lot of 20 year olds owning homes.
So the chart really needs to go more to the left, otherwise it is just feeding the boomer vs everyone else stigma. It makes it look like boomers moved more quickly into houses.
Ignoring the boomers, it makes it look like subsequent generations are finding it easier to get into homes when young? interesting. Looks like 2008 slowed everyone down, but then it has recovered, although Gen Z is a bit harder to read, some bought early, others are putting off? (but they're still quite young).