Children under 18 absolutely do not need cell phones, pagers, and computers. The only exception should be for the last for essential school work and research. It baffles me why parents buy this stuff for their kids, do little to monitor or control it, and then wonder why bad things happen.
Concerning computers, Henrico County here in Virginia issued its high school students iMac notebooks a few years ago and just upgraded to Windows units. However, the Richmond paper has reported countless problems with students viewing inappropriate websites despite filters and monitors.
Concerning cell phones and pagers, schools originally banned their possession in school because the rugrats were making drug and other shady deals using them. Now two more widespread problems with the phones in schools are appearing: (1) students using text messaging to cheat during tests, and (2) phone ring tones deliberately set at frequencies too high for most adults to hear (because we lose the ability to hear upper frequency sounds as we age).
It seems that most parents have no clue what websites their kids visit, what kind of information their kids are giving to others online or over the cell phone, whom their kids are talking to on those phones, or who is paging their kids. That "friend" of your teenage daughter's on the cell phone might be a 40-year-old molester. But few parents these days attempt to exercise control.
I lived just fine without all this stuff when I was coming up. Today's kids don't need it, with the one exception mentioned for valid schoolwork, any more than we did coming up.
The solution is not to let the kids have this stuff in the first place. And that should also include TVs in their bedrooms, video games, or the "mandatory" new car at age 16 upon receiving the highly unnecessary driver's license. American children consistently come in near the bottom in international comparisons of scholastic achievement. The too-much-freedom issue is a huge reason.
[/rant]
Concerning computers, Henrico County here in Virginia issued its high school students iMac notebooks a few years ago and just upgraded to Windows units. However, the Richmond paper has reported countless problems with students viewing inappropriate websites despite filters and monitors.
Concerning cell phones and pagers, schools originally banned their possession in school because the rugrats were making drug and other shady deals using them. Now two more widespread problems with the phones in schools are appearing: (1) students using text messaging to cheat during tests, and (2) phone ring tones deliberately set at frequencies too high for most adults to hear (because we lose the ability to hear upper frequency sounds as we age).
It seems that most parents have no clue what websites their kids visit, what kind of information their kids are giving to others online or over the cell phone, whom their kids are talking to on those phones, or who is paging their kids. That "friend" of your teenage daughter's on the cell phone might be a 40-year-old molester. But few parents these days attempt to exercise control.
I lived just fine without all this stuff when I was coming up. Today's kids don't need it, with the one exception mentioned for valid schoolwork, any more than we did coming up.
The solution is not to let the kids have this stuff in the first place. And that should also include TVs in their bedrooms, video games, or the "mandatory" new car at age 16 upon receiving the highly unnecessary driver's license. American children consistently come in near the bottom in international comparisons of scholastic achievement. The too-much-freedom issue is a huge reason.
[/rant]