Originally Posted By: BISCUT
Originally Posted By: eljefino
You can get in trouble if a licensed driver *in your household* is not on your insurance.
What trouble is that? Here in NY I've had 2 insurance companies require a completed form with childrens birthdates but there is no penalty of perjury or punishment by law. I'd assume if they could prove you defrauded them the most they could do is determine a portion of coverage is void.
On my policy with my company (yours could be different) I am REQUIRED to list all licensed drivers in my household. The penalty is they won't pay a claim for an unlisted, licensed driver-- but they'll take my money up until that point.
This comes up with teenage drivers. Parents believe the kids shouldn't get their licenses as they "must" report this to the insurance and cause a rate hike. However, by my policy at least, the kids can get their licenses but just not drive ("exist"), and there's no effective punishment the insurance can dish out.
Then later the kid suddenly has 5 years of driving "experience", or at least, licensure, and is cheaper to insure when they finally get wheels.
This should prod parents to push their kids through driver's ed even if they don't have immediate plans to drive, darn millenials.
Originally Posted By: eljefino
You can get in trouble if a licensed driver *in your household* is not on your insurance.
What trouble is that? Here in NY I've had 2 insurance companies require a completed form with childrens birthdates but there is no penalty of perjury or punishment by law. I'd assume if they could prove you defrauded them the most they could do is determine a portion of coverage is void.
On my policy with my company (yours could be different) I am REQUIRED to list all licensed drivers in my household. The penalty is they won't pay a claim for an unlisted, licensed driver-- but they'll take my money up until that point.
This comes up with teenage drivers. Parents believe the kids shouldn't get their licenses as they "must" report this to the insurance and cause a rate hike. However, by my policy at least, the kids can get their licenses but just not drive ("exist"), and there's no effective punishment the insurance can dish out.
Then later the kid suddenly has 5 years of driving "experience", or at least, licensure, and is cheaper to insure when they finally get wheels.
This should prod parents to push their kids through driver's ed even if they don't have immediate plans to drive, darn millenials.