MMO, the real deal.

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is true, and the constant droning of "submit a complaint to the FTC" is getting a bit tiresome. Just like the "you haven't used the product so you can't comment" statement, it is in reality an attempt to divert the conversation so that the published statements and claims are not discussed.

Just because the FTC allowed a claim to stand does not in reality make the claim wholly true. The FTC isn't telling you that it soaks into metal, zMAX is. And the FTC apparently isn't stopping that claim. But like you point out, it doesn't necessarily make it true either.

Originally Posted By: Garak
I'm loathe to wade into additive debates. I already stated ages ago what I thought of MMO, and it seems that Mola agrees with me. It probably was a lot more useful in the days before modern motor oils.

As for Zmax, I really don't care what the FTC says, doesn't say, approves formally, approves implicitly, or simply ignores an issue. I'm well aware that the product isn't going to soak into, diffuse into, or permeate into the metal of an engine. The FTC can tell me the sky is plaid, for all I care. I don't know a whole lot about the additive, but I do know it isn't going to live up to that one claim. Then again, I wouldn't use it even if it did. I run fully formulated motor oils and I can't think of many products out there that are actually worth the money spent to add to and adulterate a perfectly fine motor oil.
 
Originally Posted By: kschachn
This is true, and the constant droning of "submit a complaint to the FTC" is getting a bit tiresome. Just like the "you haven't used the product so you can't comment" statement, it is in reality an attempt to divert the conversation so that the published statements and claims are not discussed.

Just because the FTC allowed a claim to stand does not in reality make the claim wholly true. The FTC isn't telling you that it soaks into metal, zMAX is. And the FTC apparently isn't stopping that claim. But like you point out, it doesn't necessarily make it true either.


The constant posting of opinion as if it is fact is also getting tiresome. It's the same people over and over and over again. Yet not a single one of them is willing to step up to the plate and back up what they post. Not one.

You like others seem to miss the whole point. The FTC sued Zmax. When it came down to it, Zmax was able to provide proof that the claim "soaks into metal" was true as was others. If Zmax was not able to do so or the FTC could provide expert testimony or test results that prove it doesn't, the FTC would not have allowed them to claim it. The lawsuit would have went forward until the conclusion or Zmax dropped the claim. The FTC settled what it started and the "soaks into metal" claim still stands to this day. You may not like it but it seems Zmax stood its ground and actually proved the fact.

My point is and has been, if a few people here have so much proof that it is not true, why not provide that info to the FTC and let them go back to court with Zmax, MMO and anyone else who makes this claim? The reason no one does that is because they know they don't have the facts to back them up. Until someone steps up to the plate and files a complaint, anything else is just a opinion because facts and court docs say different. No one has yet posted a thing that changes that court decision.
 
Originally Posted By: rdalek
Originally Posted By: kschachn
This is true, and the constant droning of "submit a complaint to the FTC" is getting a bit tiresome. Just like the "you haven't used the product so you can't comment" statement, it is in reality an attempt to divert the conversation so that the published statements and claims are not discussed.

Just because the FTC allowed a claim to stand does not in reality make the claim wholly true. The FTC isn't telling you that it soaks into metal, zMAX is. And the FTC apparently isn't stopping that claim. But like you point out, it doesn't necessarily make it true either.


The constant posting of opinion as if it is fact is also getting tiresome. It's the same people over and over and over again. Yet not a single one of them is willing to step up to the plate and back up what they post.


I agree. So when are you going to start doing that?
 
I have no dog in this fight but is it possible the product just filled pores in the surface of the cast metal as even engine oil would?
What i mean is could the same claim be made for plain old engine oil and the "soaks" into metal is just advertising spin?

Just from reading it seems there is porous iron, non porous iron and this new stuff Lotus iron.
It appears from what i am reading that a porous iron is preferable for engine blocks even with its drawbacks (apparently Lotus iron has addressed that).
I cant see anything penetrating, diffusing, permeating or whatever someone wants to call it high tensile strength iron like that used in quality vises, steels, chrome, etc.

I would like to get to the bottom of the claim, Zmax is IIRC highly refined mineral oil.
Quote:
zMAX says a “soak in” period is required to penetrate into the metal. The formula works best when the parts are warm or up to operating temperature, which helps open the metal’s pores. Also, the more porous the metal the deeper the penetration;


This is exactly the theory of treating cast iron skillets, but it doesn't take Zmax to do this.
Back in those days oils were much thicker and thinning it with mineral oil would probably reduce start up wear.

All i can conclude from this whole thing is the product is doing nothing that engine oil cant do. If someone wanted to make all kinds of claims about modern engine oil it would be a long list.
That just my opinion and half arsed theory, that and two bucks will get me coffee.
 
Originally Posted By: Trajan

I agree. So when are you going to start doing that?


About the same time you or someone else steps up to the plate and files that complaint. You working on it yet? You claim you have the facts so why not go do it? I'm fine with the facts from the FTC and court myself.
 
Originally Posted By: Trav
I have no dog in this fight but is it possible the product just filled pores in the surface of the cast metal as even engine oil would?
What i mean is could the same claim be made for plain old engine oil and the "soaks" into metal is just advertising spin?

Just from reading it seems there is porous iron, non porous iron and this new stuff Lotus iron.
It appears from what i am reading that a porous iron is preferable for engine blocks even with its drawbacks (apparently Lotus iron has addressed that).
I cant see anything penetrating, diffusing, permeating or whatever someone wants to call it high tensile strength iron like that used in quality vises, steels, chrome, etc.

I would like to get to the bottom of the claim, Zmax is IIRC highly refined mineral oil.
Quote:
zMAX says a “soak in” period is required to penetrate into the metal. The formula works best when the parts are warm or up to operating temperature, which helps open the metal’s pores. Also, the more porous the metal the deeper the penetration;


This is exactly the theory of treating cast iron skillets, but it doesn't take Zmax to do this.
Back in those days oils were much thicker and thinning it with mineral oil would probably reduce start up wear.

All i can conclude from this whole thing is the product is doing nothing that engine oil cant do. If someone wanted to make all kinds of claims about modern engine oil it would be a long list.
That just my opinion and half arsed theory, that and two bucks will get me coffee.




Exactly Trav, it doesn't take ZMax, or MMO to do this, Plain Jane engine oil will do it! The problem we have is there are certain individuals that would have to admit that "porous iron", and "Lotus iron" exists. A bitter pill after several pages of bickering, and something a few of us said early on. No one said iron was a sponge, but what a few of us stated apparently exists.
 
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Originally Posted By: rdalek
Originally Posted By: kschachn
This is true, and the constant droning of "submit a complaint to the FTC" is getting a bit tiresome. Just like the "you haven't used the product so you can't comment" statement, it is in reality an attempt to divert the conversation so that the published statements and claims are not discussed.

Just because the FTC allowed a claim to stand does not in reality make the claim wholly true. The FTC isn't telling you that it soaks into metal, zMAX is. And the FTC apparently isn't stopping that claim. But like you point out, it doesn't necessarily make it true either.


The constant posting of opinion as if it is fact is also getting tiresome. It's the same people over and over and over again. Yet not a single one of them is willing to step up to the plate and back up what they post.


I agree. So when are you going to start doing that?


BEAT ME TO IT!
wink.gif
 
Originally Posted By: dave1251

BEAT ME TO IT!
wink.gif



Hey, you must have internet access so you are one of the ones that can go file that complaint and prove the rest of us wrong. Here's that link one more time in case you decide to step up to the plate.

https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov/

You can even kill two birds with one complaint. You can put Zmax and MMO in the same complaint I would guess.

Waiting . . . waiting . . . waiting . . . waiting . . .
 
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/3448496/Controlled_porous_%22Lotus&#Post3448496
 
Originally Posted By: Trajan
We're waiting......waiting........waiting..............waiting for you to prove the claim that zmax/mmo soak/penetrates into metal.

http://www.dummies.com/store/product/Physics-I-For-Dummies-2nd-Edition.productCd-0470903244.html

http://freemash.blogspot.com/2013/05/chemistry-for-dummies-pdf-ebook-free.html

http://www.bruker.com/fileadmin/user_upl...29-Jan-2013.pdf


My proof was already posted on the ZMax thread and I'm perfectly satisfied with it. Go back and look at it. I even posted pictures. The proof was provided in court. It's already documented and everything. That is something none of you have been able to argue against, not one. Despite all the posts, you still can't get around the fact it was proven in court and to the FTC. Also, to this day, the FTC has not challenged the claims. It would seem that the FTC is waiting for someone here who claims it is false to share that info with them. It seems they have one heck of a wait tho. I don't think anyone here is going to step up and do it myself.

Still waiting on you or anyone else to go prove to the FTC they are wrong now and was wrong then too.
 
The one interesting thing I have found out in this thread is that iron ore can apparently be somewhat porous and people a long time ago probably figured that out and also figured out what alloys to use so that it would be somewhat porous. Apparently graphite can have some effect and I found out about this searching online but the guy who talked about it did not go into detail. And with the technology that people have today if fuel economy was improved and wear reduced with slightly porous iron ore used it engines I am sure they can achieve that, or already have achieved it.

As for ZMax if the iron ore is somewhat porous motor oil will soak in also. It does not take some sort of 'magic' properties of ZMax.

But the strange thing is this post started out as a discussion about MMO. And look where we are now.
 
Quote:
As for ZMax if the iron ore is somewhat porous motor oil will soak in also. It does not take some sort of 'magic' properties of ZMax.


Cast iron and steel are refined from iron ore:

Metallurgy for the non-metallurgist

and yes, oil can soak (street term), the proper scientific term being "migrate," into porous surface rust and carbon but it does not go below the surface.


Quote:
But the strange thing is this post started out as a discussion about MMO. And look where we are now.


Yea, I had a feelin' that there would be a certain two characters that would bring their discordance of scientific principles and their non-understanding of scientific methodology over from another thread.

"And this session was going so well." Dr. Phil McGraw
crackmeup2.gif




al·che·my: 1.) a power or process that changes or transforms something in a mysterious or impressive way

2.) a medieval chemical science and speculative philosophy aiming to achieve the transmutation of the base metals into gold, the discovery of a universal cure for disease, and the discovery of a means of indefinitely prolonging life

3.) a power or process of transforming something common into something special
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Mystic

But the strange thing is this post started out as a discussion about MMO. And look where we are now.


I think this is where it started:

Originally Posted By: Trajan

The only evidence I've seen that Marvel Misery Oil does anything were the pics, no longer available, that Gary Allan showed of his pistons. (If there are other before/after pics, someone can show them.)

Everything else is Zmax style "proof".


Link:

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubb...al.#Post3441662
 
And you and the rest of the MMO Outfit took exception to it. And *still* have nothing to show that it does what y'all claim.

If all you want out of BITOG is an infomercial, or a place where only people who like a product can post, then I submit you're in the wrong place.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: MolaKule
Quote:
As for ZMax if the iron ore is somewhat porous motor oil will soak in also. It does not take some sort of 'magic' properties of ZMax.


Cast iron and steel are refined from iron ore and yes, oil can soak (street term), the proper scientific term being "migrate," into porous surface rust and carbon but it does not go below the surface.

I thought we had a break through, but I guess not. Yeah, 'soaks into metal' is a street term (or advertising term) to which Molakule is determined to apply a guaranteed-to-fail test.

Originally Posted By: Dr Richard Shalvoy / Arch Analytical Services
The results obtained using the Cast Iron specimens revealed that absorption of the zMAX had been shown based on the following three findings: (1) the initial releasing of material (i.e. zMAX) from the specimen occurred after placing the specimen into the high vacuum chamber. This releasing caused the vacuum to decrease as long as the specimen remained in the chamber and was not observed for the control specimen. The fact that zMAX has an effect on vacuum pressure is indeed further evidence that it has indeed penetrated the metal specimens. (2) Examination of the surface revealed a significant and increasing C signal during the hour required for analyses. This again was not observed for the control specimen. (3) The amount of C detected below the specimen’s surface (i.e. detected by depth profiling) displayed a significant increase in the level of C over that measured for the control specimen.

Comparative tests of zMAX by itself and in blends with commercial SAE 5W-30 engine oil as well as the engine oil itself revealed that zMAX by itself and when blended with the engine oil, penetrated both types of metals far deeper than engine oil alone. Although it was not possible to precisely quantify the difference in penetration depths between the engine oil, and engine oil with zMAX, measuring the percent C by AES revealed the presence of zMAX in the engine oil resulted in a 82% greater penetration (i.e. % C for engine oil alone was 27% versus % C for engine oil with zMAX was 49%). This ability to soak into metals is the key t zMAX’s effectiveness.

I guess that increased C below the surface got there by magic. Only in Molakule's world does oil remain on the surface of cast iron. It is unclear why he is so obsessed with this single issue. Molakule correctly observed that soaking into metal (or not) has nothing to do with lubrication, which does occur at the surface.

Regardless, oil soaks even better into aluminum - aluminum pistons, for example.

Originally Posted By: Dr Richard Shalvoy / Arch Analytical Services
The majority of the analyses were performed using the Cast Iron specimens as the Aluminum Alloy specimens because of their greater porosity apparently retained higher levels of absorbed material that tended to prevent any measurement using AES

In light of Molakule's scientific observation above (or was it just a lucky guess?) soaking into aluminum might seem equally useless. However, if you are planning to disassemble and de-carbon an engine, it will make your task much more pleasant if you run MMO in the oil and fuel for a week... or a month... in advance of the tear down. If you do that, you should be pleased with how clean and carbon-free are internal parts - particularly piston crowns and aluminum cylinder heads. You could eat your lunch off the deck! This is no small matter - de-carboning heads and pistons is a PITA, and, in the case of pistons, a single slip with a scraping tool can turn an expensive piston into a desk ornament.

This 'soaking into pistons' may have limited consumer appeal, since most consumers do not tear their automobile engines down each weekend. But there is one group of people who do exactly that: professional racing teams with sizable budgets. A team owner is not interested in paying a world-class mechanic to de-carbon a piston or cylinder head, if this chore can be avoided. Enter Zmax.

It is no accident that Carroll Shelby, Harry Miller and Fred Offenhasuer all used Zmax in their racing engines, which engines, taken together, dominated American racing for 'half a century. Zmax may not have given them better mileage, and it is doubtful that that their engines suffered from sludge issues, but adding Zmax meant the engines would be very clean and carbon-free on tear-down, which occurred quite often - weekly, daily, overnight. MMO does the same thing, and it's cheaper.

Fred Lencki was a personal friend of Millar, Shelby and Offenhauser - maybe that's why they chose Zmax over MMO. And, Zmax is very pure - nothing but mineral oil. MMO has other things in the mix. Who knows? From first-hand experience, this same phenomenon works on cast-iron cylinder heads as well, although cast-iron haeds aren't as damage-prone as aluminum.

In an earlier thread, Molakule seemed to grasp that Zmax's main utility had something to do with cleaning and removing engine deposits. Add to that, preventing the deposits from forming in the first place, by soaking into aluminum pistons - sort of like trying to paint on the oil soaked piece of metal.

Or, perhaps Shelby, Miller and Offenhauser go onto Molakule's list of non-technical boobs who depend on innuendo and pseudo-science. They will be in good company, along with the FAA, FTC, Federal judge in North Carolina, your grandmother with her cast-iron skillet, the painter [or welder] trying to paint [or weld] on oil-soaked metal and everyone else who disagrees with Molakule.
 
Originally Posted By: Trajan
And you and the rest of the MMO Outfit took exception to it. And *still* have nothing to show that it does what y'all claim.
If all you want out of BITOG is an infomercial, or a place where only people who like a product can post, then I submit you're in the wrong place.



Unfortunately some people don't come here to learn anything.

Rather, they seem to come here for the sole purpose of promoting questionable claims and methods while believing their own dribble.
 
Last edited:
“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
Daniel J. Boorstin

“To know that you do not know is the best.
To think you know when you do not is a disease.
Recognizing this disease as a disease is to be free of it.”
Lao Tzu
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom