| Oil | PDS KV100 | VOA KV100 | used oil analysis KV100 | HTHS | Oil temp rank | Torque rank | Test order | Iron ppm |
| Redline 5W-30 | 11.9cSt | 12.0cSt | 11.9cSt | 3.7cP | 8 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| Pennzoil 5W-30 | 10.3cSt | 10.2cSt | 10.1cSt | ~3.1cP (estimate) | 7 | 7 | 2 | 6 |
| Ravenol 5W-30 | 11.1cSt | 10.7cSt | 10.8cSt | 3.25cP | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| LiquiMoly 5W-30 | 10.3cSt | 10.9cSt | 10.6cSt | 2.9cP | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| HPL NVII 5W-30 | 10.54cSt | 10.1cSt | 10.1cSt | 3.4cP | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Mobil 1 Truck and SUV 5W-30 | 10.0cSt | 10.4cSt | 10.0cSt | ~3.1cP (estimate) | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Driven 5W-30 | 11.9cSt | 11.3cSt | 11.7cSt | 3.5cP | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 |
| AMSOIL 5W-30 | 10.3cSt | 10.2cSt | 10.0cSt | 3.11cP | 3 | 6 | 8 | 5 |
Decided to put this in a table. I don't follow the "total wear metals" thing, so I've just included iron here. Oils are ranked in terms of order tested, you can see some correlation with both:
1. Iron PPM, is slightly higher for the first two oils tested, then stabilizes.
2. Oil temp, the first three oils all ran the hottest, the lower viscosity and higher shear LM oil deviates from that trend, as does the Driven LM30, but it tracks pretty well with test order.
Was nice to hear the engine has over 7,000 pulls on it, that was one of the questions I would have had if that information wasn't shared. One thing I am curious about is this special "designed to wear fast" camshaft from Comp, which they state can get results in 2hrs (the duration of these runs) vs 100. I'm thinking how that factors into the results relative to the test order. It was installed fresh at the beginning of the previous testing that was done, and it had 24hrs of run-time on it by the time it was done.
Interesting his commentary on the Ravenol DXG having "almost no VII" and yet it's clearly middle of the pack in KRL shear performance, which seems to undermine that claim. It doesn't do appreciably better than Mobil 1 in this respect, and worse than Pennzoil.
It's also interesting to see how KRL performance doesn't really align with the 2hr in service testing. The LM oil actually increased in viscosity via used oil analysis, while it sheared massively in the KRL.
In application, it would seem that the LM was actually (due to shear and HTHS) the lightest oil tested, and this has influenced both oil temperature and torque. The Driven racing oil, despite being the 2nd heaviest, and experiencing viscosity increase, produced the lowest oil temps (though was also the 2nd last oil tested) and most torque which I expect is due to additive package choices made (he notes it's based on SN chemistry as well, which is interesting in this context, though perhaps not influential).