That or in severe service/applications where shear stability is important. Fuel dilution?So it seems if you are not using HPL for extended drain intervals, there is no reason to use HPL, as there are better options.
That or in severe service/applications where shear stability is important. Fuel dilution?So it seems if you are not using HPL for extended drain intervals, there is no reason to use HPL, as there are better options.
LM definitely has some secret sauce!LM did better than I would have thought. Just watched the video. V. comprehensive testing. I saw the most viscosity shear in my dataset with the Molygen but I was using the 5W-40 Euro blend vs. this 5W-30 variant.
That's essentially why I run HPL. Even though I use the Euro 5W-40 which has VIIs it still holds out better than any other oil I've tried for track use.That or in severe service/applications where shear stability is important. Fuel dilution?
Only recently at Walmart but it usually isn’t.I don’t think Pennzoil Ultra Platinum is typically cheaper than Mobil 1 …
Yes, I added historically …!Only recently at Walmart but it usually isn’t.
Agree and to be truly effective, the tests also should have been run several times for each oil in other orders. That said, this was better than most and the TEOST test does have me slightly rethinking Redline, my go-to oil, in a new to us vintage non water-cooled turbo...I really don't like that he used Teost with these oils. It's well known here that Teost is falling out of favor and gives false high results with oils that have high amounts of moly-based additives. The Teost results scale pretty much linearly with the concentration of moly. However, the 3 oils that performed worst in Teost have no turbo deposit/coking issues in the real world. HPL is used in fleets of turbo engines going 15k mile intervals or longer for 200k+ miles in high heat climates with no turbo issues at all. I also don't like that he used total wear metals as a comparison when there's only a 1-2 ppm between a lot of them on individual metals. They're all within the margin of error of RDE and ICP. I consider all of those results to be the same within MoE. There's no comparison to be made there. Only running the engine for 2 hours isn't going to tell much either.
It’s interesting with all the complaints about today’s costs - this remains a competitive commodity …Only recently at Walmart but it usually isn’t.
Maybe Pablo won’t shank LSJr so bad nowLike I mentioned in my original post AMSOIL Signature Series was consistently good in almost every category. IMO that’s pretty darn impressive.
Winner winnerI’m only going to post one critical comment and it should be accepted by anyone who is a CQE, or really anyone in real world product evaluations and statistical analysis. There are a few other things I could say but will say he put a LOT of work and time in this. Absolutely awesome really. And he was publicly fair. No doubt about it.
Such comparisons are so much better when performed double blind. Subconscious bias is a real thing.
Oh and wear metals are really a statistical tie.
Pennzoil Ultra Platinum is no joke.Pennzoil Ultra Platinum is better than I thought. Never cared much for Pennzoil but Pennzoil Ultra Platinum is no doubt a very good/competitive oil.