0W-8But back to “application dictates etc” … just started my Jeep after two weeks and watching the oil pressure lag is not pleasant … These dyno tests are not great guidance for that issue …
C’mon man - a female cat did that …Maybe free FCP Molygen "Predator Blood" w/tungsten-based MFC (molecular friction control) on shorter drains is the way.....
View attachment 313547
Waiting to see how many argue for HPL's wear metal numbers.... and discredit Molygen lolJust here for the comments.
![]()
So… Project Farm had it right all these years?If I had to pick an absolute overall winner - Pennzoil Ultra Platinum and AMSOIL Signature Series.
You’re not wrongSo… Project Farm had it right all these years?
![]()
(proceeds to run after posting rage bait)
Isn't that ironic? LOLSo… Project Farm had it right all these years?
![]()
(proceeds to run after posting rage bait)
HPL, Driven and RL would not meet the 30mg threshold for TEOST. The RL TEOST results are similar to what Amsoil found. Actually RL results are off the charts bad. Would you run that oil in a turbo? I don't know. I know the TEOST isn't everything, but it is a test.
"The maximum mg limit for a TEOST test (Thermo-Oxidation Engine Oil Simulation Test) varies by specification, but common limits are around 30-35 mg for modern API/ILSAC oils (like GF-5), while older specs might allow up to 60 mg, and newer ones push for even lower deposits (like 25 mg) to protect turbos"
View attachment 313546
Bring on the oil flow drag races!Isn't that ironic? LOL
Amsoil tested RL back in 2014 and it didn't meet the min. Now whether it actually matters in the real world I don't know. It's still considered a legitimate test and Amsoil seems to value it. I have posted on some of the questionable aspects of it as has Gokhan. That's really all I can say about it.No, no more Redlin, not after seeing this.
Depends on the application, though, doesn’t it?If I had to pick an absolute overall winner - Pennzoil Ultra Platinum and AMSOIL Signature Series.
Definitely need to see how this looks with Valovoline Restore and Protect, Mobil 1 Extended Performance/ESP, and Castrol Edge included. Throw in Supertech for good measure.I liked this set of tests. One thing that stood out was how brutal the KRL test really is, all of these oils showed minimal shearing after two hours on the dyno. That taps into a question I’ve had for a while, how much real world use (daily driving or even HPDE track hours) would it take to mimic the KRL results?
One thing I will criticize is the choice of oils, the only other “off the shelf” oil that Pennzoil Ultra Platinum was put up against was Mobil 1 Truck and SUV which is certainly a choice. I know in a previous video that oil was shown to be pretty stout with AN in the base oil blend but why not go with Mobil 1 ESP which he’s also shown to be shockingly shear stable, along with being cheap and easier to find than Pennzoil Ultra Platinum.
If you really want to declare Pennzoil Ultra Platinum as the king of off the shelf oils you at least need Castrol and Valvoline in the mix. Mobil 1 wasn’t far off from Pennzoil Ultra Platinum, I’d wager within experimental error. Question for the crowd, what did Pennzoil Ultra Platinum do that was widely better than Mobil 1 Truck and SUV which again isn’t even their top tier oil unlike Pennzoil Ultra Platinum.
If you’re focusing on the TEOST deposit results the euro formulations of Mobil 1 (which ESP would cover), Castrol, and Valvoline should be in the mix. Those are also all cheap and easy to find.