Don't confuse the easiest duty cycle on earth (steady highway cruising) with Castrol somehow being special oil.
On the contrary, spending 6-12 hours a day at 80mph is not "working quite hard" it's actually the easiest duty cycle you can have for an engine: steady state, low load, with an average load factor of under 30%. There's a guy who TWICE put a million miles on a Tundra (two different trucks) using just TGMO on 10k OCIs. Why? Not because TGMO is legendary or that 10k is a short OCI. It's because it was all highway all the time (light towing in his case).
Truly, any EP synthetic oil you can buy at Walmart would do the same thing in that particular case of spending the entire 8k OCI on highway miles with the cruise set. Towing, climbing altitude etc are nothing when the engine is already warmed up.
Duty cycle matters hugely. As an example, a customer I visited once had a Cummins-powered generator on their ship with 57k hours on it, and it had never been rebuilt or even opened up. This is a B series Cummins, the same engine in the Ram trucks. At an average highway speed of 50mph, that amount of hours would equate to over 2.5 million miles. The engine used very little oil and ran perfectly fine. What was the secret? Duty cycle. The generator was used for shore power, so it would be powered up when the ship came into harbor, run at an average of 35% load (at a constant speed of 1500rpm) for days to weeks at a time, then shut down.
In a world where many engine get minutes to hours per start, this engine had days to weeks per start and ran at constant speed and nearly constant load, where it was always warm and never overloaded or abused. Thus, the wear rate was so low it almost ceased wearing.
This is exactly the kind of usage your Colorado experienced on this road trip.
This is not a criticism of Castrol. I'm just indicating that all the EP oils on the market would have easily duplicated such a feat; there's nothing particularly special about the Castrol.