Originally Posted By: Tempest
Can you please show a historical reference where this worked? Massive government spending and printing of money in the last few years. Is it working? Yet you still advocate that course?
I'm not saying massive government spending, I'm saying reducing the value of USD (hence printing money) by manipulating the interest rate and hide it in the hands of the central bank of the sovereign nation.
It will lead to inflation, and that's the exact reason we will reduce the future cost of labor, and that's the ONLY WAY other than having China increase their currency to move jobs back to the US. It inflate away the bad debt, it inflate away the savings and it inflate away the obligation of future contract price. Everyone who owns cash equivalent assets (cash savings, bonds, etc) all get reset to fair market price.
In case you didn't know, we have printed money since 2001 and we have not stopped since then. Precious metal price is the indicator of what happened world wide as a result. Why else do you think we balk at China and why do you think Japan balk at us? Why are all the savings in Japan moved oversea and Yen got a sudden surge in natural disaster? Because that's what Japanese use to devalue their own labor cost and it kept their jobs with massive export, now they are suffering because USD devalued so much and they have to devalue their own currency.
What else would happen when you devalue USD? Japan, China, and the entire Latin America pays for our loss with their own national reserves. Instead of hoarding gold, they hoard USD and US debt in their own central bank, partly to devalue their own currency to match USD for export advantage, and partly to not drive up gold.
Originally Posted By: Tempest
Never said that. I said eliminate corporate taxes as this reduces costs and increase profitability.
The record $2.6 trillion in holdings isn't making them any money. They want to invest it so they can make more money. That is why people create businesses. They don't hire people just for the heck of it unlike what some people believe.
Risk (Insurance)
a. the hazard or chance of loss.
b. the degree of probability of such loss.
c. the amount that the insurance company may lose.
They don't invest it because they might lose money, because they think people don't have money to be made from, and because they don't believe the government can stimulate the economy enough to increase demand.
Look at what happen when we grant loan to the banks last time? They just hoard it instead of lending it out because it is too risky. What would happen when you eliminate tax for 10 years? The corporates will hoard it and the government will run up another 10 years of debt.
If you reduce spending and use the savings to pay back loan, and keep tax the same or increase tax, that I can agree with. For the same spending (let's assume the same spending for mathematical calculation because spending and tax are fairly independent if you can borrow money), if you do that you will just run up an ever bigger debt than we have.