PandaBear
Thread starter
I am aware that we mainly grow "field corn" and it is not the one we eat from a can or on the cob, and most are fed to animals, turn into HFCS or ethanol (same thing really just one process apart from each other). The main question I am wondering is: are feeding corn to animal better for them (grow faster) or cheaper (because corn is cheaper to grow or corn is subsidized more than others) compare to say, soy, alfalfa, grass, other feed, etc?
Why aren't other nations in the world rely as much on corn as we are? or rely on farming so much corn instead of a variety of other crops? to a point that we cannot afford to not grow them even if they are not the best for the soil or make a lot of money?
Thanks for the link y_p_w.
Why aren't other nations in the world rely as much on corn as we are? or rely on farming so much corn instead of a variety of other crops? to a point that we cannot afford to not grow them even if they are not the best for the soil or make a lot of money?
It’s Time to Rethink America’s Corn System
Only a tiny fraction of corn grown in the U.S. directly feeds the nation’s people, and much of that is from high-fructose corn syrup
www.scientificamerican.com
Last edited: