Fram Ultra for '04 Altima 2.5S

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 25, 2005
Messages
16,831
Location
ROCHESTER, NY
Is the FRAM Ultra XG7317 OK to use in this application?
In the FRAM guide, the XG 6607 is the recommended part# but, it's sooooooo small and I'd like to use the slightly larger size XG#7317. Is there a reason that FRAM didn't list the 7317 for the Altima? Maybe the gasket size or another reason?
 
Well, the reason I ask is because most Honda & Subaru use the same larger filters as my Altima in other brands(Purolator, Mobil 1, Bosch D+ etc.) but in the FRAM, it list the smaller!
 
Years ago my son had a 2002 1.8 Sentra that called for the 6607. I always installed the 7317 that was spec'd for the 2.5. SE-R 50,000+ miles and no problem. No worries at all.
 
Originally Posted By: tenderloin
Years ago my son had a 2002 1.8 Sentra that called for the 6607. I always installed the 7317 that was spec'd for the 2.5. SE-R 50,000+ miles and no problem. No worries at all.


Thank you!
Yes, I have used even larger filters in the past but, those part#'s have been discontinued(Puro# 24458, very large). And I am actually looking for(experimental only) larger filter. Larger within reason!
 
Originally Posted By: jacky
i would put xg 6607 on it, dont worry about it being small, the book is always right


Thank you but, this isn't what I asked! Please, no more comments like this! They don't answer my question(s).
 
It will be fine. Motorking (from Fram) himself has said they are interchangeable if you have the room. You could also try the 3593A if you have the width for it (same threads, etc.). I've used the 7317 and 3593A interchangeably as well on my old Acura that called for the wider 3593A.
 
Originally Posted By: ThirdeYe
It will be fine. Motorking (from Fram) himself has said they are interchangeable if you have the room. You could also try the 3593A if you have the width for it (same threads, etc.). I've used the 7317 and 3593A interchangeably as well on my old Acura that called for the wider 3593A.

Agree. I would use larger filter if there is room for it.
 
Originally Posted By: Char Baby
Originally Posted By: jacky
i would put xg 6607 on it, dont worry about it being small, the book is always right


Thank you but, this isn't what I asked! Please, no more comments like this! They don't answer my question(s).


The 6607 is likely the OEM replacement for you car. While the 7317 would work, the 6607 is the replacement so thats what Fram recommends.

The 7317 is exactly like the 6607 with the exception of the can size. Same gasket, bypass specs etc. Assuming you have the additional room, you should be fine.

I am assuming jacky was saying to use what is spec'd just in case you have a failure with catastrophic damage. Obviously it wont be covered if you are using the wrong filter for the application.

Many folks here at BITOG use different filters that what is recommended. 99.9% issue free.
smile.gif


Does a larger filter actually help? That has yet to be proven.
 
Last edited:
It could be that FRAM would like to duplicate the overall size of the genuine Nissan filter; as in matching OEM as much as possible.

Just my 2c.

Yes, you can use the 7317 or 3593 if there are no clearance concerns (ground, moving tires, axles etc.)

IIRC yours sits horizontally by the RF wheel; right?

Good timing dlundblad!
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR
Originally Posted By: ThirdeYe
It will be fine. Motorking (from Fram) himself has said they are interchangeable if you have the room. You could also try the 3593A if you have the width for it (same threads, etc.). I've used the 7317 and 3593A interchangeably as well on my old Acura that called for the wider 3593A.

Agree. I would use larger filter if there is room for it.


Yes, I have more than enough room. Which of the 2 filters(7317 or 3593A) has more filtration media? I can use the (Fram 3593A or Puro 14457), when I can't get the Puro P14610.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: GSCJR
It could be that FRAM would like to duplicate the overall size of the genuine Nissan filter; as in matching OEM as much as possible.

Just my 2c.

Yes, you can use the 7317 or 3593 if there are no clearance concerns (ground, moving tires, axles etc.)

IIRC yours sits horizontally by the RF wheel; right?

Good timing dlundblad!


Yes, you are correct in the filter placement!
 
For years Tearolator listed the 14610 for my Altima then changed it to the 14612. So maybe Fram did the same thing.
 
I mentioned above that, I also used Puro #14457 but, I meant #14459!

My OE Nissan filter was the size of the Puro 14610 & Fram #7317.

I still use the Puro #14610 or, if I can't find it(out of stock), I'll buy the #14459.
 
Last edited:
I was looking at the application guide. Tearolator lists the longer 14610 for the 2.5L and the shorter 14612 for the 3.5L. Fram lists the shorter 6607 for the 2.5L and the longer 7317 for the 3.5L.
 
Originally Posted By: Char Baby
Originally Posted By: tenderloin
Years ago my son had a 2002 1.8 Sentra that called for the 6607. I always installed the 7317 that was spec'd for the 2.5. SE-R 50,000+ miles and no problem. No worries at all.


Thank you!
Yes, I have used even larger filters in the past but, those part#'s have been discontinued(Puro# 24458, very large). And I am actually looking for(experimental only) larger filter. Larger within reason!

Take a look at some Baldwin filters. B1431, B161-S, B199 and for a very large filter(if it can fit) B202. I have used all of these filters on my bikes and cars.

ROD
 
A smaller filter I would opine would filter better for normal OCIs since its a fact a slightly dirty filter work better. Wouldnt a smaller filter get dirty faster and then trap more dirt??
 
A smaller filter will have a higher PSID, so it could push the dirt through the filter and it could go into bypass sooner. Honda says to go 15k miles on the oil filter, so I use a larger filter just to let me sleep better when going 15k miles on one filter.

ROD
 
Originally Posted By: Char Baby
I mentioned above that, I also used Puro #14457 but, I meant #14459!

My OE Nissan filter was the size of the Puro 14610 & Fram #7317.

I still use the Puro #14610 or, if I can't find it(out of stock), I'll buy the #14459.


So Fram actually lists a smaller filter than OE? Interesting.
 
Originally Posted By: Char Baby
Is the FRAM Ultra XG7317 OK to use in this application?
In the FRAM guide, the XG 6607 is the recommended part# but, it's sooooooo small and I'd like to use the slightly larger size XG#7317. Is there a reason that FRAM didn't list the 7317 for the Altima? Maybe the gasket size or another reason?


I'm using the XG7317 on my Altima V6 ... looks good after 12K miles.

2X 6K OCIs ... 12K total miles on XG7317
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom