Filling a gas-powered vehicle can still be cheaper than charging an electric one

Stop drinking the Fox Kool-Aid. They may even tell you that you have a stolen car.

Even with my Prius Prime plug-in hybrid that gets 75 mpg on gas and 5.6 miles per kWh on electricity, it's 6.7¢ per mile with gas and 4.5¢ per mile with electricity; therefore, you pay 50% more with gas. 90% of cars don't even get half that gas mileage, and the drivers end up paying twice or more for fuel with gas! On top of that, electric cars are faster, more responsive, quieter, and cleaner, and there is no oil change or obsessing with oil.

Of course, you need to be able to charge at home overnight with the current technology. If you can't, electric cars are presently not for you. They will introduce true fast-charging in the next decade with solid-state batteries.
Electric is of course better with accelerating, but I'd never say 'faster' in general as there is a difference and total electric will have peak limitation compared to ICE regardless of how you slice it. Yes, 75mpg is fantastic for pretty much anything combusting, but slow as hell compared to all the Prius type vehicles I've been stuck behind.
 
Critical thinking requires one to assess the facts, assess their applicability given the circumstances, and draw conclusions based on those assessments.

The article headline, while technically correct, requires one to analyze EV charging costs based on the absolute highest market price while simultaneously selecting a hybrid vehicle cost at a very reasonable middle ground price.

The comparison is flawed. Reasonable critical analysis demonstrates this clearly. And yet the apologists jump on the bandwagon of 'see... see... it's not always a perfect solution '.
Of course it's not always perfect. But reasonable people can be darn sure that in the preponderance of circumstances, EV's are cheaper to recharge than ICEs are to refuel on a cost per mile basis.

Bang your drums, block your ears, jump up and down. It doesn't change the truth that for most folks EV charging is cheap, cheap, cheap.

That's fair and balanced.
Interesting response especially at the end. I’m not sure why people like you are quick to say people like me are anti electric.

First of all, I’m in the electric trade so the whole thing does interest me. I actually get to install a Tesla supercharger next month and am super excited.

Also, for the rest of average America, if ownership was essentially next to nothing minus upfront cost, insurance, plates (which are taxed heavily), who wouldn’t be going on this bandwagon? I certainly would. Charge the thing at my pole barn with its 200 amp service. No gas station visits etc.

It’s just like wind and solar. People like you are so quick to say “this is the way” with your eyes closed and ears plugged, but we just aren’t there yet.. If it was worth it, we’d have more than a few solar and wind farms around here. Where I’m from, buying a windmill and feeding the grid isn’t a good fininacal plan either as the power companies give you pennies on the dollar for your electricity. I’ve looked into it and as of now, no thanks.

We actually might be doing some solar farm stuff, but the company put the project on HOLD for the foreseeable future and the whole thing is up in the air at this point.

These are real world examples from my little life. Not just stuff I read on a biased news source.
 
if everyone were to have an electric car and plug it in at the same time let’s say comes him from work at 6, the grid wouldn’t be able to charge all of the cars in most places. Our electric infrastructure needs an upgrade. I know people in CA who got solar panels but they can’t pipe back into the grid for credits because the local transformer can’t handle it or some electric co excuse.
 
A friend sent me this:

If we still had our previous Lexus Hybrid car, it would cost us $15.47
to drive 100 miles on premium gas from Sparks' Costco gas station
(currently $4.64 a gallon). Using electricity from our house, that same
The 100-mile trip only cost us $2.28 for the Tesla - big difference! If I
want to be absurd, I can say it cost us $0.00 due to our solar panels.
Unfortunately, the savings for Californians won't be nearly as good as

for Nevadans. You can thank PG&E for that.
 
if everyone were to have an electric car and plug it in at the same time let’s say comes him from work at 6, the grid wouldn’t be able to charge all of the cars in most places. Our electric infrastructure needs an upgrade. I know people in CA who got solar panels but they can’t pipe back into the grid for credits because the local transformer can’t handle it or some electric co excuse.
True--but I thought these cars could be programmed as to when they would charge?

Also most people are driving less than 50 miles a day (I think 40?). If one is plugging in their car for the night, they might have 8-10-12 hours to charge. Set to low charge rate and charge over those 8-10 hours. Now the charge rate could drop to toaster level while still topping off for max range, every morning.
 
I ordered a Tesla Model 3 Performance this past weekend. Two things about the vehicle really drew me to it - performance and efficiency ($/mi). We rented a Model 3 LR last year and the acceleration is downright addictive. If you're a car guy, you can't help but smile with every push of the go pedal. It's just fun.

A hybrid Accord would have been more practical and cheaper in the long run, but it would have been boring. :) If that's your jam, go for it! I'm a big proponent of people choosing what's best for them and enjoying it. I have no intention of trying to sell someone on a Tesla or any of the other cars in my garage (happy to share experiences, though). We all have different priorities that factor in to what suits us best. Don't like my purchase? Great! Don't buy one, it's obviously not for you.

We have other cars, so it's not going to be used as a daily driver. My daily is a 2006 TSX and we also have a 2005 4Runner, 99 Silverado, and 2022 Yukon XL. My wife homeschools our boys, so she doesn't have a daily commute. The Tesla will be her run around car and we'll take it out in the evenings and weekends when I'm home. We live in a rural area, so pretty much anything that most people are accustomed to being right down the road is 20 miles away from us. So, plenty of opportunity for us to enjoy the car on the open road (stop signs and curvy roads :)).

As for charging, I'm going to install a welder outlet (6-50) in my garage. It should charge at a rate of 30ish mph and will cost me about $50 in materials to install. Supercharging is awesome, but rarely will be taking this ride on trips that will require refueling on the road.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FZ1
Electric is of course better with accelerating, but I'd never say 'faster' in general as there is a difference and total electric will have peak limitation compared to ICE regardless of how you slice it. Yes, 75mpg is fantastic for pretty much anything combusting, but slow as hell compared to all the Prius type vehicles I've been stuck behind.
Tesla Model S Plaid has over 1,000 hp of power and over 1,200 Nm of torque:

https://insideevs.com/news/562863/tesla-models-plaid-dyno-tests/
 
What vehicle did you fill up and what is your driving routine, if you don't mind me asking?
001.webp


And going to have for sale soon. Average 60 mpg, can get 65-70 on the highway.
 
And? ICE maintains peak power as long as there is fuel being supplied. With an EV that power will be short lived and far too much time to 'refuel'...
Batteries are improving, and their power is improving as well. Model S Plaid at full power has about an 8C discharge rate (1/8 hours), and in the future, the batteries should be able to continuously endure that without degrading much. These days EVs have up to a 300–400-mile or longer range, and charging times will improve over the decade, with 15-minute (4C) regular charging becoming possible. For racing applications, there are swappable batteries as well.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FZ1
Everything is subsidized like federal loan guarantees for nuclear power.
The only nuke you guys have under construction is Vogtle, the others have all been long depreciated and generate cheap power. The issue in the last few years is that, despite how cheap that power is, gas is still cheaper. And a gas plant is MUCH cheaper than a nuke to build and doesn't require a million years of red tape to get through in order to put a shovel in the ground.

A FIT is a kick to the stones to the ratepayer, as they are the one forced to directly cover that cost. A tax credit moves that to the taxpayer, typically, and these are usually less generous. FIT's are the worst of the lot. A loan, assuming the utility has to pay the whole thing back, isn't the same thing. Either the utility believes it can make money and pay off the loan with the plant at the existing market rates, or they don't, in which case they won't build it. In places that don't use a market (public utilities) the "at cost" model is what is employed, which is how Ontario Hydro operated up here and how Quebec Hydro operates currently.

Of course many of the markets aren't "true" markets and are perverted by "first to grid rights" and REC's, giving preferential treatment to certain sources to virtue signal.
 
if everyone were to have an electric car and plug it in at the same time let’s say comes him from work at 6, the grid wouldn’t be able to charge all of the cars in most places. Our electric infrastructure needs an upgrade. I know people in CA who got solar panels but they can’t pipe back into the grid for credits because the local transformer can’t handle it or some electric co excuse.
Australia is currently dealing with the issue of too much solar. Folks installed panels, expecting to get a healthy return on the power they piped back into the grid, but if the demand isn't there, or the level threatens stability (solar provides no inertia) it is curtailed, so people's feedback is rejected. Adding a battery would of course "solve" the problem, but that adds a massive cost to the system and undermines the economics.
 
Well, if we get "plenty", how come the price is sky rocketing? Supply and demand. We don't have enough supply to keep the price down. The Keystone pipeline will provide 800,000 more barrels per day to the U.S., and, the $ we pay for the oil stays on the North American Continent making all of us more prosperous.
According to Econ, it is Price Elasticity. Perhaps you know the oil company profits are skyrocketing? Of course there is no one answer, but it is far more than a supply issue. Demand is constant, possible down due to people driving less. Supply? There are no gas lines, but certainly the world oil market is in a state of uncertainty.
The world runs on oil; it is inelastic for the most part.
  • Price elasticity of demand is a measurement of the change in consumption of a product in relation to a change in its price.
  • A good is elastic if a price change causes a substantial change in demand or supply.
  • A good is inelastic if a price change does not cause demand or supply to change very much.
  • The availability of a substitute for a product affects its elasticity. If there are no good substitutes and the product is necessary, demand won’t change when the price goes up, making it inelastic.
 
if everyone were to have an electric car and plug it in at the same time let’s say comes him from work at 6, the grid wouldn’t be able to charge all of the cars in most places. Our electric infrastructure needs an upgrade. I know people in CA who got solar panels but they can’t pipe back into the grid for credits because the local transformer can’t handle it or some electric co excuse.
Yes, so why would anyone do that? Some people charge at work, which is pretty common around here. Our car has a charging scheduler so you can charge during off peak times. I understand Silicon Valley is pretty unique with its high tech attitude, high energy prices and lotsa sunshine. EVs are not for everyone, but if you have one you learn what works for your charging needs.
Here is the Model 3 charging screen; you set the parameters here, including charge schedule.
1647013966747.webp
 
Not sure why there are panties in a twist about that article around here. It's merely comparing a "fill up" pound for pound substitute experience of owning an electric car vs gas. If you can charge from home great, and the article concedes it's much less. 98% of the crap apartments here in LA don't have access to charging. The last apt building I lived in you had to fight to get access to the charger. Even in my town house now, I could not charge a Tesla for meaningful range with 110v. I don't drive that much working from home so I don't have a dog in this fight - but I wouldn't spend 70k on a car just to virtue signal.
Also, the subsidy for electric cars is ridiculous at this point. Even musk said they don't need subsidies at this point. It's only jacking up prices. GM and Ford are licking their chops for uncle sams paychecks.
 
Corporate greed.....not supply and demand, that pipeline was mostly for oil to be exported putting money in the oil companies pockets not gas in our vehicles.
What? Well, uh, if we received 800,000 more barrels per day from an operating KP, and we need that oil in the U.S........... we would not export the oil. We would use it here in the U.S. right?
 
Back
Top Bottom