Originally Posted By: SAM1
Okayyyyyyyyyyy.....but I just do not understand how or why a synthetic would not be better for an engine running under severe service/short trips. I thought the entire notion of producing a synthetic oil was to provide more and better protection. Now it sounds as if I'm hearing that synthetic provides no additional protectin whatsoever compared to a conventional oil. (???)
Synthetic oil is superior in extreme cold (Alaska), extreme heat (turbocharged applications), and very long OCI. In my opinion he experiences neither of these. With very short trip, he will have excessive water condensation and possibly fuel dillution, and synthetic will not stop it from happening. He just needs to change the oil early. So, since he won't be pushing very long OCIs, why waste money on expensive oil?
Okayyyyyyyyyyy.....but I just do not understand how or why a synthetic would not be better for an engine running under severe service/short trips. I thought the entire notion of producing a synthetic oil was to provide more and better protection. Now it sounds as if I'm hearing that synthetic provides no additional protectin whatsoever compared to a conventional oil. (???)
Synthetic oil is superior in extreme cold (Alaska), extreme heat (turbocharged applications), and very long OCI. In my opinion he experiences neither of these. With very short trip, he will have excessive water condensation and possibly fuel dillution, and synthetic will not stop it from happening. He just needs to change the oil early. So, since he won't be pushing very long OCIs, why waste money on expensive oil?