D
Deleted member 89374
Would you please re-post the comment that you believe was deleted?I think a mod deleted one of my reply posts in this thread and I didn't receive a notification.
Would you please re-post the comment that you believe was deleted?I think a mod deleted one of my reply posts in this thread and I didn't receive a notification.
I would, but I don't want to get in trouble.Would you please re-post the comment that you believe was deleted?
Question: I can see how going up a grade or so on the diluter engines will help prevent oil thinning out too much over the course of the oci. I often wonder though on other engines if we jump up several grades above called for (recommended by manufacturer) how does that affect the pumping , oil pressure and even the heat in the engines? Are we taxing them harder doing that? I recall for ever that 10w40 was the universal. Then they all acted like it was poison! Why? CAFE standards? New designs etc... zz/ Anyone hve ideas?Yes, I got some carbonaceous "paste" in my oil filter (not as extensive as what Wayne has seen, but our truck has lower miles) and the truck (5.7L HEMI) has spent its life on M1 EP 0W-20, which is a PAO-based oil with I'd assume low solvency/polarity. @UncleDave got the same material in his oil filter, in a vehicle that also spent its life on high quality API-compliant synthetics.
The assumption is that this stuff came from the ring land area, due to how dirty the HEMI runs. M1 EP is not advertised as being able to clean, like most API oils, its purpose to maintain cleanliness, which varies in difficulty depending on the engine and operating conditions. Mobil has advertised that M1 FS 0W-40 on the other hand, can clean, which I also experienced on our old Expedition, yielding the same sort of material that Wayne saw in his filter.
IMHO, this highlights some of the formulation constraints placed on API compliant oils, which become less restrictive once you step outside the Resource Conserving grade range (which xW-40 does).
Fuel economy is the primary driving force behind the pursuit of thinner and thinner oils. Using a grade inappropriate for the prevailing conditions (20W-50 when it's -20C) can be hard on things, but within reason, the main impact will be unnecessary thrashing of the oil sending it through the bypass and some wasted power and fuel (going too thick).Question: I can see how going up a grade or so on the diluter engines will help prevent oil thinning out too much over the course of the oci. I often wonder though on other engines if we jump up several grades above called for (recommended by manufacturer) how does that affect the pumping , oil pressure and even the heat in the engines? Are we taxing them harder doing that? I recall for ever that 10w40 was the universal. Then they all acted like it was poison! Why? CAFE standards? New designs etc... zz/ Anyone hve ideas?
It's way more critical to use the correct "W" rating of oil for cold pumpability than it is to worry about the pumping of hot thin oil. Besides, there's a reason positive displacement oil pumps are used in engine oiling systems ... to ensure an adequate volume of oil is supplied regardless of the oil viscosity. If the correct W rating for the start-up conditions is used, then adequate oil volume and lubrication will occur, and it will also occur when the oil is hot regardless if it's xW-8 or xW-60.Question: I can see how going up a grade or so on the diluter engines will help prevent oil thinning out too much over the course of the oci. I often wonder though on other engines if we jump up several grades above called for (recommended by manufacturer) how does that affect the pumping , oil pressure and even the heat in the engines? Are we taxing them harder doing that? I recall for ever that 10w40 was the universal. Then they all acted like it was poison! Why? CAFE standards? New designs etc... zz/ Anyone hve ideas?
Since thou art a lazy one, I will oblige the trolls just this once.
A simple search through BITOG yields a lot of similar takes.
There is zero difference.There is hardly any difference.
In Yuma AZ you can run 10w-30 vs 5w-30 and your engine will thank you.Nope, I don’t believe it does, or at least that’s my semi-educated answer. Now, my Voodoo Doll, Ouija Board answer is yes. When I switched to Redline 5W30 from M1, I clearly noticed the absence of initial lifter noise.![]()
That’s not a bad idea, and I don’t know why I haven’t considered that before now.In Yuma AZ you can run 10w-30 vs 5w-30 and your engine will thank you.
I’m skeptical that different oils evoke different sounds from an engine. Just me, I’m not selling any products.
M1 is one of the best oils but its also one of the loudest.
So noise is not necessarily indicative of quality.
That goes completely against common sense. While the reverse is true (a "quiet oil" is not indicative in and of itself of total quality), a loud oil cannot be a quality oil considering what makes the noise in the first place (engine bits hammering into eachother).
I did this with a recent oil change on my moms 2017 GMC Terrian. The new oil dropped the sound by 2 decibels.Everybody carries a sound meter around with them these days (also known as a smart phone) but nobody posts any data. I've always found that interesting.